Cargando…

The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice

The accepted norm in most laboratories around the globe is feeding laboratory mice an ad libitum diet, although several health impairments are well-established. In contrast, reducing the animals' body weight by feeding them less food once per day (referred to as 24 h schedule) has been shown to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feige-Diller, Janina, Krakenberg, Viktoria, Bierbaum, Louisa, Seifert, Leonie, Palme, Rupert, Kaiser, Sylvia, Sachser, Norbert, Richter, S. Helene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00479
_version_ 1783489651779043328
author Feige-Diller, Janina
Krakenberg, Viktoria
Bierbaum, Louisa
Seifert, Leonie
Palme, Rupert
Kaiser, Sylvia
Sachser, Norbert
Richter, S. Helene
author_facet Feige-Diller, Janina
Krakenberg, Viktoria
Bierbaum, Louisa
Seifert, Leonie
Palme, Rupert
Kaiser, Sylvia
Sachser, Norbert
Richter, S. Helene
author_sort Feige-Diller, Janina
collection PubMed
description The accepted norm in most laboratories around the globe is feeding laboratory mice an ad libitum diet, although several health impairments are well-established. In contrast, reducing the animals' body weight by feeding them less food once per day (referred to as 24 h schedule) has been shown to enhance life span and reduce disease susceptibility. Against this background, this study aimed at systematically investigating the effects of different feeding routines. Therefore, three feeding routines were compared to the standard ad libitum feeding and effects on body weight development and welfare were investigated in male C57BL/6J mice. In particular, a 24 h schedule group, an AUTO group, characterized by an automated supply of small pieces of food all over the day, and a 4 h removal group, characterized by daily removal of food for 4 h, were studied. While the removal of food for 4 h per day did not lead to a reduction of body weight, and hence is unlikely to prevent negative effects of overfeeding, both the 24 h schedule group and the AUTO group led to the aspired body weight reduction. In the AUTO group, however, higher levels of corticosterone metabolites and stereotypies were observed, implying a rather negative impact on welfare. By contrast, no distinct negative effects of a 24 h schedule were found. Studies like this underline the general need for evidence-based severity assessments of any procedure involving living animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69711092020-01-28 The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice Feige-Diller, Janina Krakenberg, Viktoria Bierbaum, Louisa Seifert, Leonie Palme, Rupert Kaiser, Sylvia Sachser, Norbert Richter, S. Helene Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The accepted norm in most laboratories around the globe is feeding laboratory mice an ad libitum diet, although several health impairments are well-established. In contrast, reducing the animals' body weight by feeding them less food once per day (referred to as 24 h schedule) has been shown to enhance life span and reduce disease susceptibility. Against this background, this study aimed at systematically investigating the effects of different feeding routines. Therefore, three feeding routines were compared to the standard ad libitum feeding and effects on body weight development and welfare were investigated in male C57BL/6J mice. In particular, a 24 h schedule group, an AUTO group, characterized by an automated supply of small pieces of food all over the day, and a 4 h removal group, characterized by daily removal of food for 4 h, were studied. While the removal of food for 4 h per day did not lead to a reduction of body weight, and hence is unlikely to prevent negative effects of overfeeding, both the 24 h schedule group and the AUTO group led to the aspired body weight reduction. In the AUTO group, however, higher levels of corticosterone metabolites and stereotypies were observed, implying a rather negative impact on welfare. By contrast, no distinct negative effects of a 24 h schedule were found. Studies like this underline the general need for evidence-based severity assessments of any procedure involving living animals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6971109/ /pubmed/31993444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00479 Text en Copyright © 2020 Feige-Diller, Krakenberg, Bierbaum, Seifert, Palme, Kaiser, Sachser and Richter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Feige-Diller, Janina
Krakenberg, Viktoria
Bierbaum, Louisa
Seifert, Leonie
Palme, Rupert
Kaiser, Sylvia
Sachser, Norbert
Richter, S. Helene
The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
title The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
title_full The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
title_fullStr The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
title_short The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
title_sort effects of different feeding routines on welfare in laboratory mice
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00479
work_keys_str_mv AT feigedillerjanina theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT krakenbergviktoria theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT bierbaumlouisa theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT seifertleonie theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT palmerupert theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT kaisersylvia theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT sachsernorbert theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT richtershelene theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT feigedillerjanina effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT krakenbergviktoria effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT bierbaumlouisa effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT seifertleonie effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT palmerupert effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT kaisersylvia effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT sachsernorbert effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice
AT richtershelene effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice