Cargando…
The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice
The accepted norm in most laboratories around the globe is feeding laboratory mice an ad libitum diet, although several health impairments are well-established. In contrast, reducing the animals' body weight by feeding them less food once per day (referred to as 24 h schedule) has been shown to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00479 |
_version_ | 1783489651779043328 |
---|---|
author | Feige-Diller, Janina Krakenberg, Viktoria Bierbaum, Louisa Seifert, Leonie Palme, Rupert Kaiser, Sylvia Sachser, Norbert Richter, S. Helene |
author_facet | Feige-Diller, Janina Krakenberg, Viktoria Bierbaum, Louisa Seifert, Leonie Palme, Rupert Kaiser, Sylvia Sachser, Norbert Richter, S. Helene |
author_sort | Feige-Diller, Janina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accepted norm in most laboratories around the globe is feeding laboratory mice an ad libitum diet, although several health impairments are well-established. In contrast, reducing the animals' body weight by feeding them less food once per day (referred to as 24 h schedule) has been shown to enhance life span and reduce disease susceptibility. Against this background, this study aimed at systematically investigating the effects of different feeding routines. Therefore, three feeding routines were compared to the standard ad libitum feeding and effects on body weight development and welfare were investigated in male C57BL/6J mice. In particular, a 24 h schedule group, an AUTO group, characterized by an automated supply of small pieces of food all over the day, and a 4 h removal group, characterized by daily removal of food for 4 h, were studied. While the removal of food for 4 h per day did not lead to a reduction of body weight, and hence is unlikely to prevent negative effects of overfeeding, both the 24 h schedule group and the AUTO group led to the aspired body weight reduction. In the AUTO group, however, higher levels of corticosterone metabolites and stereotypies were observed, implying a rather negative impact on welfare. By contrast, no distinct negative effects of a 24 h schedule were found. Studies like this underline the general need for evidence-based severity assessments of any procedure involving living animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6971109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69711092020-01-28 The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice Feige-Diller, Janina Krakenberg, Viktoria Bierbaum, Louisa Seifert, Leonie Palme, Rupert Kaiser, Sylvia Sachser, Norbert Richter, S. Helene Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The accepted norm in most laboratories around the globe is feeding laboratory mice an ad libitum diet, although several health impairments are well-established. In contrast, reducing the animals' body weight by feeding them less food once per day (referred to as 24 h schedule) has been shown to enhance life span and reduce disease susceptibility. Against this background, this study aimed at systematically investigating the effects of different feeding routines. Therefore, three feeding routines were compared to the standard ad libitum feeding and effects on body weight development and welfare were investigated in male C57BL/6J mice. In particular, a 24 h schedule group, an AUTO group, characterized by an automated supply of small pieces of food all over the day, and a 4 h removal group, characterized by daily removal of food for 4 h, were studied. While the removal of food for 4 h per day did not lead to a reduction of body weight, and hence is unlikely to prevent negative effects of overfeeding, both the 24 h schedule group and the AUTO group led to the aspired body weight reduction. In the AUTO group, however, higher levels of corticosterone metabolites and stereotypies were observed, implying a rather negative impact on welfare. By contrast, no distinct negative effects of a 24 h schedule were found. Studies like this underline the general need for evidence-based severity assessments of any procedure involving living animals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6971109/ /pubmed/31993444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00479 Text en Copyright © 2020 Feige-Diller, Krakenberg, Bierbaum, Seifert, Palme, Kaiser, Sachser and Richter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Feige-Diller, Janina Krakenberg, Viktoria Bierbaum, Louisa Seifert, Leonie Palme, Rupert Kaiser, Sylvia Sachser, Norbert Richter, S. Helene The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice |
title | The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice |
title_full | The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice |
title_short | The Effects of Different Feeding Routines on Welfare in Laboratory Mice |
title_sort | effects of different feeding routines on welfare in laboratory mice |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feigedillerjanina theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT krakenbergviktoria theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT bierbaumlouisa theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT seifertleonie theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT palmerupert theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT kaisersylvia theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT sachsernorbert theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT richtershelene theeffectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT feigedillerjanina effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT krakenbergviktoria effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT bierbaumlouisa effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT seifertleonie effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT palmerupert effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT kaisersylvia effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT sachsernorbert effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice AT richtershelene effectsofdifferentfeedingroutinesonwelfareinlaboratorymice |