Cargando…

Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing

Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allender, S., Hayward, J., Gupta, S., Sanigorski, A., Rana, S., Seward, H., Jacobs, S., Venkatesh, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0205-y
_version_ 1783489680248930304
author Allender, S.
Hayward, J.
Gupta, S.
Sanigorski, A.
Rana, S.
Seward, H.
Jacobs, S.
Venkatesh, S.
author_facet Allender, S.
Hayward, J.
Gupta, S.
Sanigorski, A.
Rana, S.
Seward, H.
Jacobs, S.
Venkatesh, S.
author_sort Allender, S.
collection PubMed
description Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity (PA) with their patients. Interventions were developed based on a causal loop diagram with 26 GPs across 13 clinics in Geelong, Australia. GPs prioritised eight from more than 80 potential interventions to increase GP discussion of PA with patients. Following a 2-week baseline, a multi-arm bandit algorithm was used to assign optimal strategies to GP clinics with the target outcome being GP PA discussion rates. The algorithm was updated weekly and the process iterated until the more promising strategies emerged (a duration of seven weeks). The top three performing strategies were continued for 3 weeks to improve the power of the hypothesis test of effectiveness for each strategy compared to baseline. GPs recorded a total of 11,176 conversations about PA. GPs identified 15 factors affecting GP PA discussion rates with patients including GP skills and awareness, fragmentation of care and fear of adverse outcomes. The two most effective strategies were correctly identified within seven weeks of the algorithm-based assignment of strategies. These were clinic reception staff providing PA information to patients at check in and PA screening questionnaires completed in the waiting room. This study demonstrates an efficient way to test and identify optimal strategies from multiple possible solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69712302020-01-28 Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing Allender, S. Hayward, J. Gupta, S. Sanigorski, A. Rana, S. Seward, H. Jacobs, S. Venkatesh, S. NPJ Digit Med Article Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity (PA) with their patients. Interventions were developed based on a causal loop diagram with 26 GPs across 13 clinics in Geelong, Australia. GPs prioritised eight from more than 80 potential interventions to increase GP discussion of PA with patients. Following a 2-week baseline, a multi-arm bandit algorithm was used to assign optimal strategies to GP clinics with the target outcome being GP PA discussion rates. The algorithm was updated weekly and the process iterated until the more promising strategies emerged (a duration of seven weeks). The top three performing strategies were continued for 3 weeks to improve the power of the hypothesis test of effectiveness for each strategy compared to baseline. GPs recorded a total of 11,176 conversations about PA. GPs identified 15 factors affecting GP PA discussion rates with patients including GP skills and awareness, fragmentation of care and fear of adverse outcomes. The two most effective strategies were correctly identified within seven weeks of the algorithm-based assignment of strategies. These were clinic reception staff providing PA information to patients at check in and PA screening questionnaires completed in the waiting room. This study demonstrates an efficient way to test and identify optimal strategies from multiple possible solutions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6971230/ /pubmed/31993505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0205-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Allender, S.
Hayward, J.
Gupta, S.
Sanigorski, A.
Rana, S.
Seward, H.
Jacobs, S.
Venkatesh, S.
Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
title Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
title_full Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
title_fullStr Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
title_short Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
title_sort bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from gp prescribing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0205-y
work_keys_str_mv AT allenders bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT haywardj bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT guptas bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT sanigorskia bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT ranas bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT sewardh bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT jacobss bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing
AT venkateshs bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing