Cargando…
Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing
Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0205-y |
_version_ | 1783489680248930304 |
---|---|
author | Allender, S. Hayward, J. Gupta, S. Sanigorski, A. Rana, S. Seward, H. Jacobs, S. Venkatesh, S. |
author_facet | Allender, S. Hayward, J. Gupta, S. Sanigorski, A. Rana, S. Seward, H. Jacobs, S. Venkatesh, S. |
author_sort | Allender, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity (PA) with their patients. Interventions were developed based on a causal loop diagram with 26 GPs across 13 clinics in Geelong, Australia. GPs prioritised eight from more than 80 potential interventions to increase GP discussion of PA with patients. Following a 2-week baseline, a multi-arm bandit algorithm was used to assign optimal strategies to GP clinics with the target outcome being GP PA discussion rates. The algorithm was updated weekly and the process iterated until the more promising strategies emerged (a duration of seven weeks). The top three performing strategies were continued for 3 weeks to improve the power of the hypothesis test of effectiveness for each strategy compared to baseline. GPs recorded a total of 11,176 conversations about PA. GPs identified 15 factors affecting GP PA discussion rates with patients including GP skills and awareness, fragmentation of care and fear of adverse outcomes. The two most effective strategies were correctly identified within seven weeks of the algorithm-based assignment of strategies. These were clinic reception staff providing PA information to patients at check in and PA screening questionnaires completed in the waiting room. This study demonstrates an efficient way to test and identify optimal strategies from multiple possible solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6971230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69712302020-01-28 Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing Allender, S. Hayward, J. Gupta, S. Sanigorski, A. Rana, S. Seward, H. Jacobs, S. Venkatesh, S. NPJ Digit Med Article Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity (PA) with their patients. Interventions were developed based on a causal loop diagram with 26 GPs across 13 clinics in Geelong, Australia. GPs prioritised eight from more than 80 potential interventions to increase GP discussion of PA with patients. Following a 2-week baseline, a multi-arm bandit algorithm was used to assign optimal strategies to GP clinics with the target outcome being GP PA discussion rates. The algorithm was updated weekly and the process iterated until the more promising strategies emerged (a duration of seven weeks). The top three performing strategies were continued for 3 weeks to improve the power of the hypothesis test of effectiveness for each strategy compared to baseline. GPs recorded a total of 11,176 conversations about PA. GPs identified 15 factors affecting GP PA discussion rates with patients including GP skills and awareness, fragmentation of care and fear of adverse outcomes. The two most effective strategies were correctly identified within seven weeks of the algorithm-based assignment of strategies. These were clinic reception staff providing PA information to patients at check in and PA screening questionnaires completed in the waiting room. This study demonstrates an efficient way to test and identify optimal strategies from multiple possible solutions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6971230/ /pubmed/31993505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0205-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Allender, S. Hayward, J. Gupta, S. Sanigorski, A. Rana, S. Seward, H. Jacobs, S. Venkatesh, S. Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing |
title | Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing |
title_full | Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing |
title_fullStr | Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing |
title_short | Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing |
title_sort | bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from gp prescribing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0205-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenders bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT haywardj bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT guptas bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT sanigorskia bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT ranas bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT sewardh bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT jacobss bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing AT venkateshs bayesianstrategyselectionidentifiesoptimalsolutionstocomplexproblemsusinganexamplefromgpprescribing |