Cargando…

Efficacy of protocol‐based non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study

AIM: The efficacy of non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains unclear. Variation in both the etiology of ARDS and patient factors has resulted in inconsistent application of NPPV. We have developed a protocol‐based NPPV strategy as a fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satou, Takahisa, Imamura, Hiroshi, Mochiduki, Katunori, Ichikawa, Michitaro, Takeshige, Kanako, Kamijo, Hiroshi, Takayama, Hiroshi, Nitta, Kenichi, Kikuchi, Tadashi, Okamoto, Kazufumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.465
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The efficacy of non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains unclear. Variation in both the etiology of ARDS and patient factors has resulted in inconsistent application of NPPV. We have developed a protocol‐based NPPV strategy as a first‐line intervention for ARDS. The aim of this observational study was to determine if protocol‐based NPPV improves the outcome in patients with ARDS. METHODS: We identified patients with ARDS treated by protocol‐based NPPV at our institution between March 2006 and March 2010 and categorized them according to NPPV success or failure. Success was defined as avoidance of intubation and remaining alive during NPPV. RESULTS: Eighty‐eight of 169 patients diagnosed with ARDS during the study period were treated using the protocol. Fifty‐two (76%) of 68 patients who were eligible for the study were successfully treated and did not require endotracheal intubation. The overall mortality rate at 28 days after initiation of NPPV was 12%. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the success group than in the failure group (P < 0.01). The PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio after 12–24 h of NPPV was significantly higher in the success group than in the failure group (202 ± 63 versus 145 ± 46; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate was higher and the mortality was lower in patients than in historical controls. Protocol‐based NPPV could be effective in patients with ARDS.