Cargando…

A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial

AIM: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in schools can increase the rate of bystander CPR. We assessed whether a “Quality CPR (QCPR) Classroom” can support CPR performance by students trained by a teacher who is not a CPR instructor. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was undertaken to as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Shota, Hara, Takahiro, Tsukigase, Kyoko, Sagisaka, Ryo, Myklebust, Helge, Birkenes, Tonje S., Takyu, Hiroshi, Kidokoro, Yutaro, Tanaka, Hideharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.455
_version_ 1783489733206212608
author Tanaka, Shota
Hara, Takahiro
Tsukigase, Kyoko
Sagisaka, Ryo
Myklebust, Helge
Birkenes, Tonje S.
Takyu, Hiroshi
Kidokoro, Yutaro
Tanaka, Hideharu
author_facet Tanaka, Shota
Hara, Takahiro
Tsukigase, Kyoko
Sagisaka, Ryo
Myklebust, Helge
Birkenes, Tonje S.
Takyu, Hiroshi
Kidokoro, Yutaro
Tanaka, Hideharu
author_sort Tanaka, Shota
collection PubMed
description AIM: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in schools can increase the rate of bystander CPR. We assessed whether a “Quality CPR (QCPR) Classroom” can support CPR performance by students trained by a teacher who is not a CPR instructor. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a 50‐min Practice While Watch CPR training program enhanced by QCPR Classroom, which used 42 manikins connected by Bluetooth to real‐time feedback monitoring. Fifty‐seven students were divided into Group 1, taught by a non‐CPR‐instructor, and Group 2, taught by a CPR instructor. Psychomotor and cognitive tests were administered before and after training. Primary outcomes were post‐training compression depth and rate and percent of improvement in adequate depth, recoil, and overall score. The secondary outcome was risk improvement. RESULTS: Post‐training, Group 1 achieved 62.1 ± 7.7 mm and 118.0 ± 3.6 compressions/min whereas Group 2 achieved 57.4 ± 9.8 mm and 119.8 ± 5.4 compressions/min. The overall score improvement in percentage points was 36.4 ± 25.9% and 27.0 ± 27.7%, respectively (P ≤ 0.001 for both). The adequate depth improvement in percentage points was 22.4 ± 35.4% and 32.5 ± 40.0%, respectively (P = 0.33). Teaching by a non‐CPR instructor improved student cognitive knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Using a QCPR Classroom to enhance CPR teaching by a non‐CPR‐instructor results in similar or better outcomes compared to using a CPR instructor. Use of a Practice While Watch QCPR Classroom will provide adequate quality in preparing students for CPR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69714702020-01-27 A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial Tanaka, Shota Hara, Takahiro Tsukigase, Kyoko Sagisaka, Ryo Myklebust, Helge Birkenes, Tonje S. Takyu, Hiroshi Kidokoro, Yutaro Tanaka, Hideharu Acute Med Surg Original Articles AIM: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in schools can increase the rate of bystander CPR. We assessed whether a “Quality CPR (QCPR) Classroom” can support CPR performance by students trained by a teacher who is not a CPR instructor. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a 50‐min Practice While Watch CPR training program enhanced by QCPR Classroom, which used 42 manikins connected by Bluetooth to real‐time feedback monitoring. Fifty‐seven students were divided into Group 1, taught by a non‐CPR‐instructor, and Group 2, taught by a CPR instructor. Psychomotor and cognitive tests were administered before and after training. Primary outcomes were post‐training compression depth and rate and percent of improvement in adequate depth, recoil, and overall score. The secondary outcome was risk improvement. RESULTS: Post‐training, Group 1 achieved 62.1 ± 7.7 mm and 118.0 ± 3.6 compressions/min whereas Group 2 achieved 57.4 ± 9.8 mm and 119.8 ± 5.4 compressions/min. The overall score improvement in percentage points was 36.4 ± 25.9% and 27.0 ± 27.7%, respectively (P ≤ 0.001 for both). The adequate depth improvement in percentage points was 22.4 ± 35.4% and 32.5 ± 40.0%, respectively (P = 0.33). Teaching by a non‐CPR instructor improved student cognitive knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Using a QCPR Classroom to enhance CPR teaching by a non‐CPR‐instructor results in similar or better outcomes compared to using a CPR instructor. Use of a Practice While Watch QCPR Classroom will provide adequate quality in preparing students for CPR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6971470/ /pubmed/31988767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.455 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Acute Medicine & Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tanaka, Shota
Hara, Takahiro
Tsukigase, Kyoko
Sagisaka, Ryo
Myklebust, Helge
Birkenes, Tonje S.
Takyu, Hiroshi
Kidokoro, Yutaro
Tanaka, Hideharu
A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
title A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
title_full A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
title_fullStr A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
title_short A pilot study of Practice While Watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
title_sort pilot study of practice while watch based 50 min school quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation classroom training: a cluster randomized control trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.455
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakashota apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT haratakahiro apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT tsukigasekyoko apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT sagisakaryo apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT myklebusthelge apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT birkenestonjes apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT takyuhiroshi apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT kidokoroyutaro apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT tanakahideharu apilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT tanakashota pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT haratakahiro pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT tsukigasekyoko pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT sagisakaryo pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT myklebusthelge pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT birkenestonjes pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT takyuhiroshi pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT kidokoroyutaro pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT tanakahideharu pilotstudyofpracticewhilewatchbased50minschoolqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationclassroomtrainingaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial