Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce blood loss following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Wei, Liu, Yafang, Liu, Wei Feng, Li, Xiao Long, Fei, Yanqiang, Gao, Xing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1528-8
_version_ 1783489799128088576
author Ye, Wei
Liu, Yafang
Liu, Wei Feng
Li, Xiao Long
Fei, Yanqiang
Gao, Xing
author_facet Ye, Wei
Liu, Yafang
Liu, Wei Feng
Li, Xiao Long
Fei, Yanqiang
Gao, Xing
author_sort Ye, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce blood loss following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published before June 20, 2019. Studies clearly reporting a comparison of oral and intravenous TXA were selected, and total blood loss (TBL), the decline in hemoglobin (DHB), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), intramuscular venous thrombosis (IVT), the length of hospital stay, and the transfusion rate were evaluated. The weighted mean differences and relative risks were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 1140 (oral 557; intravenous 583) patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of total blood loss, the decline in hemoglobin, the length of hospital stay, the incidence of DVT or IVT, or the transfusion rate between the oral and intravenous groups, and five studies reported that oral TXA was associated with a lower cost. CONCLUSION: Our research suggests that compared with intravenous use of TXA, the oral approach has similar clinical outcomes and is less expensive for total joint replacement patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69718632020-01-27 Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial Ye, Wei Liu, Yafang Liu, Wei Feng Li, Xiao Long Fei, Yanqiang Gao, Xing J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce blood loss following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published before June 20, 2019. Studies clearly reporting a comparison of oral and intravenous TXA were selected, and total blood loss (TBL), the decline in hemoglobin (DHB), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), intramuscular venous thrombosis (IVT), the length of hospital stay, and the transfusion rate were evaluated. The weighted mean differences and relative risks were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 1140 (oral 557; intravenous 583) patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of total blood loss, the decline in hemoglobin, the length of hospital stay, the incidence of DVT or IVT, or the transfusion rate between the oral and intravenous groups, and five studies reported that oral TXA was associated with a lower cost. CONCLUSION: Our research suggests that compared with intravenous use of TXA, the oral approach has similar clinical outcomes and is less expensive for total joint replacement patients. BioMed Central 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6971863/ /pubmed/31959199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1528-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ye, Wei
Liu, Yafang
Liu, Wei Feng
Li, Xiao Long
Fei, Yanqiang
Gao, Xing
Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1528-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yewei comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenoralandintravenousadministrationoftranexamicacidforprimarytotalkneehipreplacementametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuyafang comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenoralandintravenousadministrationoftranexamicacidforprimarytotalkneehipreplacementametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuweifeng comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenoralandintravenousadministrationoftranexamicacidforprimarytotalkneehipreplacementametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lixiaolong comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenoralandintravenousadministrationoftranexamicacidforprimarytotalkneehipreplacementametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feiyanqiang comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenoralandintravenousadministrationoftranexamicacidforprimarytotalkneehipreplacementametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaoxing comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweenoralandintravenousadministrationoftranexamicacidforprimarytotalkneehipreplacementametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial