Cargando…

Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device is effective to regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke survivors. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device with manual sit-to-sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joey, Ng Chee Man, Ho Marc, Woo Ka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668319866053
_version_ 1783489823509577728
author Joey, Ng Chee Man
Ho Marc, Woo Ka
author_facet Joey, Ng Chee Man
Ho Marc, Woo Ka
author_sort Joey, Ng Chee Man
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device is effective to regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke survivors. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device with manual sit-to-stand training. DESIGN: Parallel randomized controlled, assessor-blinded trial between January 2015 and May 2018. Randomization was performed by drawing lots to allocate treatment groups. SETTING: A rehabilitation hospital in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: 69 participants in medical wards with unilateral hemiparetic stroke. A total of 52 participants fulfilled the study requirements. INTERVENTION: Ten sessions of intervention with conventional physiotherapy program followed, by self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device, or by manual sit-to-stand training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of participants regained the independence of sit-to-stand, sit-to-stand test from the Balance master® and Five-repetition sit-to-stand test. RESULTS: 69 participants (intervention, n = 36; control, n = 33) were randomized (mean age, 69.8 years (SD: 10.6), mean post-stroke days 18.6 (SD: 16.0)). Seventeen participants had not completed 10 sessions of training, leaving 52 (n = 26; n = 26) participants for per protocol analysis. Eighteen participants in the intervention group and 10 participants in the control group had regained the independence of sit-to-stand (Phi and Cramer’s V: –0.31 and 0.31). The participants in the intervention group were faster to complete the Five-repetition sit-to-stand test than the control group (32.7 sec (SD: 1.93) versus 48.4 sec (SD, 6.8); 95% confidence interval, –30.8 to –0.7; p < 0.05). No adverse side effects occurred during and after the training across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device may have positive effects on speeding up regaining the independence of sit-to-stand on sub-acute stroke survivors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69719652020-01-31 Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial Joey, Ng Chee Man Ho Marc, Woo Ka J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device is effective to regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke survivors. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device with manual sit-to-stand training. DESIGN: Parallel randomized controlled, assessor-blinded trial between January 2015 and May 2018. Randomization was performed by drawing lots to allocate treatment groups. SETTING: A rehabilitation hospital in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: 69 participants in medical wards with unilateral hemiparetic stroke. A total of 52 participants fulfilled the study requirements. INTERVENTION: Ten sessions of intervention with conventional physiotherapy program followed, by self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device, or by manual sit-to-stand training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of participants regained the independence of sit-to-stand, sit-to-stand test from the Balance master® and Five-repetition sit-to-stand test. RESULTS: 69 participants (intervention, n = 36; control, n = 33) were randomized (mean age, 69.8 years (SD: 10.6), mean post-stroke days 18.6 (SD: 16.0)). Seventeen participants had not completed 10 sessions of training, leaving 52 (n = 26; n = 26) participants for per protocol analysis. Eighteen participants in the intervention group and 10 participants in the control group had regained the independence of sit-to-stand (Phi and Cramer’s V: –0.31 and 0.31). The participants in the intervention group were faster to complete the Five-repetition sit-to-stand test than the control group (32.7 sec (SD: 1.93) versus 48.4 sec (SD, 6.8); 95% confidence interval, –30.8 to –0.7; p < 0.05). No adverse side effects occurred during and after the training across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device may have positive effects on speeding up regaining the independence of sit-to-stand on sub-acute stroke survivors. SAGE Publications 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6971965/ /pubmed/32010452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668319866053 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Joey, Ng Chee Man
Ho Marc, Woo Ka
Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort does self-initiated sit-to-stand training with an assistive device regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patient? a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668319866053
work_keys_str_mv AT joeyngcheeman doesselfinitiatedsittostandtrainingwithanassistivedeviceregaintheindependenceofsittostandinstrokepatientasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT homarcwooka doesselfinitiatedsittostandtrainingwithanassistivedeviceregaintheindependenceofsittostandinstrokepatientasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial