Cargando…

Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Height and weight data from electronic health records are increasingly being used to estimate the prevalence of childhood obesity. Here, we aim to assess the selection bias due to missing weight and height data from electronic health records in children older than five. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayon-Orea, Carmen, Moreno-Iribas, Conchi, Delfrade, Josu, Sanchez-Echenique, Manuela, Amiano, Pilar, Ardanaz, Eva, Gorricho, Javier, Basterra, Garbiñe, Nuin, Marian, Guevara, Marcela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1020-8
_version_ 1783489828863606784
author Sayon-Orea, Carmen
Moreno-Iribas, Conchi
Delfrade, Josu
Sanchez-Echenique, Manuela
Amiano, Pilar
Ardanaz, Eva
Gorricho, Javier
Basterra, Garbiñe
Nuin, Marian
Guevara, Marcela
author_facet Sayon-Orea, Carmen
Moreno-Iribas, Conchi
Delfrade, Josu
Sanchez-Echenique, Manuela
Amiano, Pilar
Ardanaz, Eva
Gorricho, Javier
Basterra, Garbiñe
Nuin, Marian
Guevara, Marcela
author_sort Sayon-Orea, Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Height and weight data from electronic health records are increasingly being used to estimate the prevalence of childhood obesity. Here, we aim to assess the selection bias due to missing weight and height data from electronic health records in children older than five. METHODS: Cohort study of 10,811 children born in Navarra (Spain) between 2002 and 2003, who were still living in this region by December 2016. We examined the differences between measured and non-measured children older than 5 years considering weight-associated variables (sex, rural or urban residence, family income and weight status at 2–5 yrs). These variables were used to calculate stabilized weights for inverse-probability weighting and to conduct multiple imputation for the missing data. We calculated complete data prevalence and adjusted prevalence considering the missing data using inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for ages 6 to 14 and group ages 6 to 9 and 10 to 14. RESULTS: For 6–9 years, complete data, inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation obesity age-adjusted prevalence were 13.18% (95% CI: 12.54–13.85), 13.22% (95% CI: 12.57–13.89) and 13.02% (95% CI: 12.38–13.66) and for 10–14 years 8.61% (95% CI: 8.06–9.18), 8.62% (95% CI: 8.06–9.20) and 8.24% (95% CI: 7.70–8.78), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ages at which well-child visits are scheduled and for the 6 to 9 and 10 to 14 age groups, weight status estimations are similar using complete data, multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting. Readily available electronic health record data may be a tool to monitor the weight status in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6971988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69719882020-01-27 Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records Sayon-Orea, Carmen Moreno-Iribas, Conchi Delfrade, Josu Sanchez-Echenique, Manuela Amiano, Pilar Ardanaz, Eva Gorricho, Javier Basterra, Garbiñe Nuin, Marian Guevara, Marcela BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Height and weight data from electronic health records are increasingly being used to estimate the prevalence of childhood obesity. Here, we aim to assess the selection bias due to missing weight and height data from electronic health records in children older than five. METHODS: Cohort study of 10,811 children born in Navarra (Spain) between 2002 and 2003, who were still living in this region by December 2016. We examined the differences between measured and non-measured children older than 5 years considering weight-associated variables (sex, rural or urban residence, family income and weight status at 2–5 yrs). These variables were used to calculate stabilized weights for inverse-probability weighting and to conduct multiple imputation for the missing data. We calculated complete data prevalence and adjusted prevalence considering the missing data using inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for ages 6 to 14 and group ages 6 to 9 and 10 to 14. RESULTS: For 6–9 years, complete data, inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation obesity age-adjusted prevalence were 13.18% (95% CI: 12.54–13.85), 13.22% (95% CI: 12.57–13.89) and 13.02% (95% CI: 12.38–13.66) and for 10–14 years 8.61% (95% CI: 8.06–9.18), 8.62% (95% CI: 8.06–9.20) and 8.24% (95% CI: 7.70–8.78), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ages at which well-child visits are scheduled and for the 6 to 9 and 10 to 14 age groups, weight status estimations are similar using complete data, multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting. Readily available electronic health record data may be a tool to monitor the weight status in children. BioMed Central 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6971988/ /pubmed/31959164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1020-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sayon-Orea, Carmen
Moreno-Iribas, Conchi
Delfrade, Josu
Sanchez-Echenique, Manuela
Amiano, Pilar
Ardanaz, Eva
Gorricho, Javier
Basterra, Garbiñe
Nuin, Marian
Guevara, Marcela
Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
title Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
title_full Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
title_fullStr Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
title_full_unstemmed Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
title_short Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
title_sort inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6971988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1020-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sayonoreacarmen inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT morenoiribasconchi inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT delfradejosu inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT sanchezecheniquemanuela inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT amianopilar inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT ardanazeva inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT gorrichojavier inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT basterragarbine inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT nuinmarian inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords
AT guevaramarcela inverseprobabilityweightingandmultipleimputationforevaluatingselectionbiasintheestimationofchildhoodobesityprevalenceusingdatafromelectronichealthrecords