Cargando…

Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the gap between countries’ self-evaluation and external evaluation regarding core capacity of infectious disease control required by International Health Regulations and the influence factors of the gap. METHODS: We collected countries’ self-evaluated scores (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Feng-Jen, Turbat, Battsetseg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-0541-3
_version_ 1783489833162768384
author Tsai, Feng-Jen
Turbat, Battsetseg
author_facet Tsai, Feng-Jen
Turbat, Battsetseg
author_sort Tsai, Feng-Jen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the gap between countries’ self-evaluation and external evaluation regarding core capacity of infectious disease control required by International Health Regulations and the influence factors of the gap. METHODS: We collected countries’ self-evaluated scores (International Health Regulations Monitoring tool, IHRMT) of 2016 and 2017, and external evaluation scores (Joint External Evaluation, JEE) from WHO website on 4rd and 27rd November, 2018. There were 127 and 163 countries with IHRMT scores in 2016 and in 2017, and 74 countries with JEE scores included in the analysis. The gap between countries’ self-evaluation and external evaluation was represented by the difference between condensed IHR scores and JEE. Civil liberties (CL) scores were collected as indicators of the transparency of each country. The Human Development Index (HDI) and data indicating the density of physicians and nurses (HWD) were collected to reflect countries’ development and health workforce statuses. Then, chi-square test and logistic regression were performed to determine the correlation between the gap of IHRMT and JEE, and civil liberties, human development, and health workforce status. RESULTS: Countries’ self-evaluation scores significantly decreased from 2016 to 2017. Countries’ external evaluation scores are consistently 1 to 1.5 lower than self-evaluation scores. There were significantly more countries with high HDI status, high CL status and high HWD status in groups with bigger gap between IHRMT and JEE. And countries with higher HDI status presented a higher risk of having bigger gap between countries’ self and external scores (OR = 3.181). CONCLUSION: Our study result indicated that countries’ transparency represented by CL status do play a role in the gap between IHR and JEE scores. But HDI status is the key factor which significantly associated with the gap. The main reason for the gap in the current world is the different interpretation of evaluation of high HDI countries, though low CL countries tended to over-scored their capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6972006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69720062020-01-27 Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity? Tsai, Feng-Jen Turbat, Battsetseg Global Health Research BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the gap between countries’ self-evaluation and external evaluation regarding core capacity of infectious disease control required by International Health Regulations and the influence factors of the gap. METHODS: We collected countries’ self-evaluated scores (International Health Regulations Monitoring tool, IHRMT) of 2016 and 2017, and external evaluation scores (Joint External Evaluation, JEE) from WHO website on 4rd and 27rd November, 2018. There were 127 and 163 countries with IHRMT scores in 2016 and in 2017, and 74 countries with JEE scores included in the analysis. The gap between countries’ self-evaluation and external evaluation was represented by the difference between condensed IHR scores and JEE. Civil liberties (CL) scores were collected as indicators of the transparency of each country. The Human Development Index (HDI) and data indicating the density of physicians and nurses (HWD) were collected to reflect countries’ development and health workforce statuses. Then, chi-square test and logistic regression were performed to determine the correlation between the gap of IHRMT and JEE, and civil liberties, human development, and health workforce status. RESULTS: Countries’ self-evaluation scores significantly decreased from 2016 to 2017. Countries’ external evaluation scores are consistently 1 to 1.5 lower than self-evaluation scores. There were significantly more countries with high HDI status, high CL status and high HWD status in groups with bigger gap between IHRMT and JEE. And countries with higher HDI status presented a higher risk of having bigger gap between countries’ self and external scores (OR = 3.181). CONCLUSION: Our study result indicated that countries’ transparency represented by CL status do play a role in the gap between IHR and JEE scores. But HDI status is the key factor which significantly associated with the gap. The main reason for the gap in the current world is the different interpretation of evaluation of high HDI countries, though low CL countries tended to over-scored their capacity. BioMed Central 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6972006/ /pubmed/31959196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-0541-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tsai, Feng-Jen
Turbat, Battsetseg
Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?
title Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?
title_full Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?
title_fullStr Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?
title_full_unstemmed Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?
title_short Is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for IHR core capacity?
title_sort is countries’ transparency associated with gaps between countries’ self and external evaluations for ihr core capacity?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-0541-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaifengjen iscountriestransparencyassociatedwithgapsbetweencountriesselfandexternalevaluationsforihrcorecapacity
AT turbatbattsetseg iscountriestransparencyassociatedwithgapsbetweencountriesselfandexternalevaluationsforihrcorecapacity