Cargando…
Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar
BACKGROUND: Most maternal health programs in low- and middle- income countries estimate gestational age to provide appropriate antenatal care at the correct times throughout the pregnancy. Although various gestational dating methods have been validated in research studies, the performance of these m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4904-5 |
_version_ | 1783489837213417472 |
---|---|
author | Fulcher, Isabel Hedt, Kaya Marealle, Stella Tibaijuka, Jalia Abdalla, Omar Hofmann, Rachel Layer, Erica Mitchell, Marc Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany |
author_facet | Fulcher, Isabel Hedt, Kaya Marealle, Stella Tibaijuka, Jalia Abdalla, Omar Hofmann, Rachel Layer, Erica Mitchell, Marc Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany |
author_sort | Fulcher, Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most maternal health programs in low- and middle- income countries estimate gestational age to provide appropriate antenatal care at the correct times throughout the pregnancy. Although various gestational dating methods have been validated in research studies, the performance of these methods has not been evaluated on a larger scale, such as within health systems. The objective of this research was to investigate the magnitude and impact of errors in estimated delivery dates on health facility delivery among women enrolled in a maternal health program in Zanzibar. METHODS: This study included 4225 women who were enrolled in the Safer Deliveries program and delivered before May 31, 2017. The exposure of interest was error in estimated delivery date categorized as: severe overestimate, when estimated delivery date (EDD) was 36 days or more after the actual delivery date (ADD); moderate overestimate, when EDD was 15 to 35 days after ADD; accurate, when EDD was 6 days before to 14 days after ADD; and underestimate, when EDD was 7 days or more before ADD. We used Chi-squared tests to identify factors associated with errors in estimated delivery dates. We performed logistic regression to assess the impact of errors in estimated delivery dates on health facility delivery adjusting for age, district of residence, HIV status, and occurrence of past home delivery. RESULTS: In our data, 28% of the estimated delivery dates were a severe overestimate, 23% moderate overestimate, 41% accurate, and 8% underestimate. Compared to women with an accurate delivery date, women with a moderate or severe overestimate were significantly less likely to deliver in a health facility (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: [0.59, 0.86]; OR = 0.74, 95% CI: [0.61, 0.91]). When adjusting for multiple confounders, women with moderate overestimates were significantly less likely to deliver in a health facility (AOR = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.61, 0.93]); the result moved slightly towards null for women with severe overestimates (AOR = 0.84, 95% CI: [0.69, 1.03]). CONCLUSIONS: The overestimation of women’s EDDs reduces the likelihood of health facility delivery. To address this, maternal health programs should improve estimation of EDD or attempt to curb the effect of these errors within their programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6972023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69720232020-01-27 Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar Fulcher, Isabel Hedt, Kaya Marealle, Stella Tibaijuka, Jalia Abdalla, Omar Hofmann, Rachel Layer, Erica Mitchell, Marc Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most maternal health programs in low- and middle- income countries estimate gestational age to provide appropriate antenatal care at the correct times throughout the pregnancy. Although various gestational dating methods have been validated in research studies, the performance of these methods has not been evaluated on a larger scale, such as within health systems. The objective of this research was to investigate the magnitude and impact of errors in estimated delivery dates on health facility delivery among women enrolled in a maternal health program in Zanzibar. METHODS: This study included 4225 women who were enrolled in the Safer Deliveries program and delivered before May 31, 2017. The exposure of interest was error in estimated delivery date categorized as: severe overestimate, when estimated delivery date (EDD) was 36 days or more after the actual delivery date (ADD); moderate overestimate, when EDD was 15 to 35 days after ADD; accurate, when EDD was 6 days before to 14 days after ADD; and underestimate, when EDD was 7 days or more before ADD. We used Chi-squared tests to identify factors associated with errors in estimated delivery dates. We performed logistic regression to assess the impact of errors in estimated delivery dates on health facility delivery adjusting for age, district of residence, HIV status, and occurrence of past home delivery. RESULTS: In our data, 28% of the estimated delivery dates were a severe overestimate, 23% moderate overestimate, 41% accurate, and 8% underestimate. Compared to women with an accurate delivery date, women with a moderate or severe overestimate were significantly less likely to deliver in a health facility (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: [0.59, 0.86]; OR = 0.74, 95% CI: [0.61, 0.91]). When adjusting for multiple confounders, women with moderate overestimates were significantly less likely to deliver in a health facility (AOR = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.61, 0.93]); the result moved slightly towards null for women with severe overestimates (AOR = 0.84, 95% CI: [0.69, 1.03]). CONCLUSIONS: The overestimation of women’s EDDs reduces the likelihood of health facility delivery. To address this, maternal health programs should improve estimation of EDD or attempt to curb the effect of these errors within their programs. BioMed Central 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6972023/ /pubmed/31959165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4904-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fulcher, Isabel Hedt, Kaya Marealle, Stella Tibaijuka, Jalia Abdalla, Omar Hofmann, Rachel Layer, Erica Mitchell, Marc Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar |
title | Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar |
title_full | Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar |
title_fullStr | Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar |
title_full_unstemmed | Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar |
title_short | Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar |
title_sort | errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in zanzibar |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4904-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fulcherisabel errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT hedtkaya errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT mareallestella errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT tibaijukajalia errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT abdallaomar errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT hofmannrachel errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT layererica errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT mitchellmarc errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar AT hedtgauthierbethany errorsinestimatedgestationalagesreducethelikelihoodofhealthfacilitydeliveriesresultsfromanobservationalcohortstudyinzanzibar |