Cargando…

3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the feasibility and efficiency of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) assisted by three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3DVAPS) and conventional 2D planning for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Chao, Li, Xin, Zhang, Min, Yang, Jian, Cheng, Zhigang, Yu, Xiaoling, Han, Zhiyu, Liu, Fangyi, Dong, Linan, Yu, Jie, Liang, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6519-y
_version_ 1783489838185447424
author An, Chao
Li, Xin
Zhang, Min
Yang, Jian
Cheng, Zhigang
Yu, Xiaoling
Han, Zhiyu
Liu, Fangyi
Dong, Linan
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
author_facet An, Chao
Li, Xin
Zhang, Min
Yang, Jian
Cheng, Zhigang
Yu, Xiaoling
Han, Zhiyu
Liu, Fangyi
Dong, Linan
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
author_sort An, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the feasibility and efficiency of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) assisted by three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3DVAPS) and conventional 2D planning for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (diameter > 3 cm). METHODS: One hundred thirty patients with 223 HCC nodules (5.0 ± 1.5 cm in diameter, [3.0–10.0 cm]) who met the eligibility criteria divided into 3D and 2D planning group were reviewed from April 2015 to August 2018. Ablation parameters and oncological outcomes were compared, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local tumor progression (LTP). Multivariate analysis was performed on clinicopathological variables to identify the risk factors for OS and LTP. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21 months (range 3–44). Insertion number (5.4 ± 1.2 VS. 4.5 ± 0.9, P = 0.034), ablation time (1249.2 ± 654.2 s VS. 1082.4 ± 584.7 s, P = 0.048), ablation energy (57,000 ± 11,892 J VS. 42,600 ± 10,271 J, P = 0.038) and success rate of first ablation (95.0% VS. 85.7%, P = 0.033) were higher in the 3D planning group compared with those in 2D planning group. There was no statistical difference in OS, and RFS between the two groups (P = 0.995, P = 0.845). LTP rate of 3D planning group was less than that of 2D planning group (16.5% VS 41.2%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed tumor maximal diameters (P < 0.001), tumor number (P = 0.003) and preoperative TACE (P < 0.001) were predictors for OS and sessions (P = 0.024), a-fetoprotein level (P = 0.004), and preoperative planning (P = 0.002) were predictors for LTP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3DVAPS improves precision of US guided ablation resulting in lower LTP and higher 5 mm-AM for patients with HCC lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6972027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69720272020-01-27 3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application An, Chao Li, Xin Zhang, Min Yang, Jian Cheng, Zhigang Yu, Xiaoling Han, Zhiyu Liu, Fangyi Dong, Linan Yu, Jie Liang, Ping BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the feasibility and efficiency of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) assisted by three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3DVAPS) and conventional 2D planning for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (diameter > 3 cm). METHODS: One hundred thirty patients with 223 HCC nodules (5.0 ± 1.5 cm in diameter, [3.0–10.0 cm]) who met the eligibility criteria divided into 3D and 2D planning group were reviewed from April 2015 to August 2018. Ablation parameters and oncological outcomes were compared, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local tumor progression (LTP). Multivariate analysis was performed on clinicopathological variables to identify the risk factors for OS and LTP. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21 months (range 3–44). Insertion number (5.4 ± 1.2 VS. 4.5 ± 0.9, P = 0.034), ablation time (1249.2 ± 654.2 s VS. 1082.4 ± 584.7 s, P = 0.048), ablation energy (57,000 ± 11,892 J VS. 42,600 ± 10,271 J, P = 0.038) and success rate of first ablation (95.0% VS. 85.7%, P = 0.033) were higher in the 3D planning group compared with those in 2D planning group. There was no statistical difference in OS, and RFS between the two groups (P = 0.995, P = 0.845). LTP rate of 3D planning group was less than that of 2D planning group (16.5% VS 41.2%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed tumor maximal diameters (P < 0.001), tumor number (P = 0.003) and preoperative TACE (P < 0.001) were predictors for OS and sessions (P = 0.024), a-fetoprotein level (P = 0.004), and preoperative planning (P = 0.002) were predictors for LTP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3DVAPS improves precision of US guided ablation resulting in lower LTP and higher 5 mm-AM for patients with HCC lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter. BioMed Central 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6972027/ /pubmed/31959147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6519-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
An, Chao
Li, Xin
Zhang, Min
Yang, Jian
Cheng, Zhigang
Yu, Xiaoling
Han, Zhiyu
Liu, Fangyi
Dong, Linan
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application
title 3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application
title_full 3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application
title_fullStr 3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application
title_full_unstemmed 3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application
title_short 3D visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (Diameter >3): a precise clinical application
title_sort 3d visualization ablation planning system assisted microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (diameter >3): a precise clinical application
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6519-y
work_keys_str_mv AT anchao 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT lixin 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT zhangmin 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT yangjian 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT chengzhigang 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT yuxiaoling 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT hanzhiyu 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT liufangyi 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT donglinan 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT yujie 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication
AT liangping 3dvisualizationablationplanningsystemassistedmicrowaveablationforhepatocellularcarcinomadiameter3apreciseclinicalapplication