Cargando…
To test or to estimate? P‐values versus effect sizes
Most research in transplant medicine includes statistical analysis of observed data. Too often authors solely rely on P‐values derived by statistical tests to answer their research questions. A P‐value smaller than 0.05 is typically used to declare “statistical significance” and hence, “proves” that...
Autores principales: | Dunkler, Daniela, Haller, Maria, Oberbauer, Rainer, Heinze, Georg |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31560143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13535 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predicting donor, recipient and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation to inform pretransplant counselling: the donor and recipient linked iPREDICTLIVING tool – a retrospective study
por: Haller, Maria C., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The roles of predictors in cardiovascular risk models - a question of modeling culture?
por: Wallisch, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician
por: Heinze, Georg, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Re-estimation improved the performance of two Framingham cardiovascular risk equations and the Pooled Cohort equations: A nationwide registry analysis
por: Wallisch, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Publisher Correction: Re-estimation improved the performance of two Framingham cardiovascular risk equations and the Pooled Cohort equations: A nationwide registry analysis
por: Wallisch, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2020)