Cargando…
Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
Despite the numerous benefits of the postpartum copper intrauterine device (PPIUD), which is inserted within 48 hours after giving birth, it is underutilized in many resource‐constrained settings, including Tanzania. We conducted in‐depth interviews with 20 pregnant women who received contraceptive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31755132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12106 |
_version_ | 1783489873196351488 |
---|---|
author | Huber‐Krum, Sarah Hackett, Kristy Senderowicz, Leigh Pearson, Erin Francis, Joel M. Siril, Hellen Ulenga, Nzovu Shah, Iqbal |
author_facet | Huber‐Krum, Sarah Hackett, Kristy Senderowicz, Leigh Pearson, Erin Francis, Joel M. Siril, Hellen Ulenga, Nzovu Shah, Iqbal |
author_sort | Huber‐Krum, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the numerous benefits of the postpartum copper intrauterine device (PPIUD), which is inserted within 48 hours after giving birth, it is underutilized in many resource‐constrained settings, including Tanzania. We conducted in‐depth interviews with 20 pregnant women who received contraceptive counseling during routine antenatal care in 2016–2017 and 27 postpartum women who had a PPIUD inserted in 2018 to understand reasons for use versus nonuse and continuation versus discontinuation. Primary motivators for using a PPIUD included: convenience, effectiveness, perceived lack of side effects, and duration of pregnancy protection. Barriers to use included: fear of insertion, concerns related to sexual experiences post‐insertion, and limited knowledge. Women who had a PPIUD inserted continued use when their expectations matched their experience, while discontinuation resulted from unexpected expulsion and experience of unanticipated side effects. Frequent follow‐up and guidance on side‐effect management influenced women's decisions to continue use. To support uptake and continued utilization of the PPIUD, postpartum contraceptive counseling should explicitly address side effects and risk of expulsion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6972629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69726292020-01-27 Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania Huber‐Krum, Sarah Hackett, Kristy Senderowicz, Leigh Pearson, Erin Francis, Joel M. Siril, Hellen Ulenga, Nzovu Shah, Iqbal Stud Fam Plann Articles Despite the numerous benefits of the postpartum copper intrauterine device (PPIUD), which is inserted within 48 hours after giving birth, it is underutilized in many resource‐constrained settings, including Tanzania. We conducted in‐depth interviews with 20 pregnant women who received contraceptive counseling during routine antenatal care in 2016–2017 and 27 postpartum women who had a PPIUD inserted in 2018 to understand reasons for use versus nonuse and continuation versus discontinuation. Primary motivators for using a PPIUD included: convenience, effectiveness, perceived lack of side effects, and duration of pregnancy protection. Barriers to use included: fear of insertion, concerns related to sexual experiences post‐insertion, and limited knowledge. Women who had a PPIUD inserted continued use when their expectations matched their experience, while discontinuation resulted from unexpected expulsion and experience of unanticipated side effects. Frequent follow‐up and guidance on side‐effect management influenced women's decisions to continue use. To support uptake and continued utilization of the PPIUD, postpartum contraceptive counseling should explicitly address side effects and risk of expulsion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-21 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6972629/ /pubmed/31755132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12106 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Studies in Family Planning published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Population Council This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Huber‐Krum, Sarah Hackett, Kristy Senderowicz, Leigh Pearson, Erin Francis, Joel M. Siril, Hellen Ulenga, Nzovu Shah, Iqbal Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania |
title | Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania |
title_full | Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania |
title_short | Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania |
title_sort | women's perspectives on postpartum intrauterine devices in tanzania |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31755132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huberkrumsarah womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT hackettkristy womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT senderowiczleigh womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT pearsonerin womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT francisjoelm womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT sirilhellen womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT ulenganzovu womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania AT shahiqbal womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania |