Cargando…

Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania

Despite the numerous benefits of the postpartum copper intrauterine device (PPIUD), which is inserted within 48 hours after giving birth, it is underutilized in many resource‐constrained settings, including Tanzania. We conducted in‐depth interviews with 20 pregnant women who received contraceptive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber‐Krum, Sarah, Hackett, Kristy, Senderowicz, Leigh, Pearson, Erin, Francis, Joel M., Siril, Hellen, Ulenga, Nzovu, Shah, Iqbal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31755132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12106
_version_ 1783489873196351488
author Huber‐Krum, Sarah
Hackett, Kristy
Senderowicz, Leigh
Pearson, Erin
Francis, Joel M.
Siril, Hellen
Ulenga, Nzovu
Shah, Iqbal
author_facet Huber‐Krum, Sarah
Hackett, Kristy
Senderowicz, Leigh
Pearson, Erin
Francis, Joel M.
Siril, Hellen
Ulenga, Nzovu
Shah, Iqbal
author_sort Huber‐Krum, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Despite the numerous benefits of the postpartum copper intrauterine device (PPIUD), which is inserted within 48 hours after giving birth, it is underutilized in many resource‐constrained settings, including Tanzania. We conducted in‐depth interviews with 20 pregnant women who received contraceptive counseling during routine antenatal care in 2016–2017 and 27 postpartum women who had a PPIUD inserted in 2018 to understand reasons for use versus nonuse and continuation versus discontinuation. Primary motivators for using a PPIUD included: convenience, effectiveness, perceived lack of side effects, and duration of pregnancy protection. Barriers to use included: fear of insertion, concerns related to sexual experiences post‐insertion, and limited knowledge. Women who had a PPIUD inserted continued use when their expectations matched their experience, while discontinuation resulted from unexpected expulsion and experience of unanticipated side effects. Frequent follow‐up and guidance on side‐effect management influenced women's decisions to continue use. To support uptake and continued utilization of the PPIUD, postpartum contraceptive counseling should explicitly address side effects and risk of expulsion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6972629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69726292020-01-27 Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania Huber‐Krum, Sarah Hackett, Kristy Senderowicz, Leigh Pearson, Erin Francis, Joel M. Siril, Hellen Ulenga, Nzovu Shah, Iqbal Stud Fam Plann Articles Despite the numerous benefits of the postpartum copper intrauterine device (PPIUD), which is inserted within 48 hours after giving birth, it is underutilized in many resource‐constrained settings, including Tanzania. We conducted in‐depth interviews with 20 pregnant women who received contraceptive counseling during routine antenatal care in 2016–2017 and 27 postpartum women who had a PPIUD inserted in 2018 to understand reasons for use versus nonuse and continuation versus discontinuation. Primary motivators for using a PPIUD included: convenience, effectiveness, perceived lack of side effects, and duration of pregnancy protection. Barriers to use included: fear of insertion, concerns related to sexual experiences post‐insertion, and limited knowledge. Women who had a PPIUD inserted continued use when their expectations matched their experience, while discontinuation resulted from unexpected expulsion and experience of unanticipated side effects. Frequent follow‐up and guidance on side‐effect management influenced women's decisions to continue use. To support uptake and continued utilization of the PPIUD, postpartum contraceptive counseling should explicitly address side effects and risk of expulsion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-21 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6972629/ /pubmed/31755132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12106 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Studies in Family Planning published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Population Council This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Huber‐Krum, Sarah
Hackett, Kristy
Senderowicz, Leigh
Pearson, Erin
Francis, Joel M.
Siril, Hellen
Ulenga, Nzovu
Shah, Iqbal
Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
title Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
title_full Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
title_fullStr Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
title_short Women's Perspectives on Postpartum Intrauterine Devices in Tanzania
title_sort women's perspectives on postpartum intrauterine devices in tanzania
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31755132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12106
work_keys_str_mv AT huberkrumsarah womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT hackettkristy womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT senderowiczleigh womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT pearsonerin womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT francisjoelm womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT sirilhellen womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT ulenganzovu womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania
AT shahiqbal womensperspectivesonpostpartumintrauterinedevicesintanzania