Cargando…

Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped versus cylindric inter‐dental brushes in patients receiving supportive periodontal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After sample size estimation, 20 periodontal maintenance patients diagnosed with periodontitis stage 3 were recruited. Brush...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnabl, Dagmar, Goebel, Georg, Kadletz, Alice, Gaenzer, Hanna, Steiner, René, Laimer, Johannes, Kapferer‐Seebacher, Ines
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13210
_version_ 1783489875291406336
author Schnabl, Dagmar
Goebel, Georg
Kadletz, Alice
Gaenzer, Hanna
Steiner, René
Laimer, Johannes
Kapferer‐Seebacher, Ines
author_facet Schnabl, Dagmar
Goebel, Georg
Kadletz, Alice
Gaenzer, Hanna
Steiner, René
Laimer, Johannes
Kapferer‐Seebacher, Ines
author_sort Schnabl, Dagmar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped versus cylindric inter‐dental brushes in patients receiving supportive periodontal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After sample size estimation, 20 periodontal maintenance patients diagnosed with periodontitis stage 3 were recruited. Brushing efficacy of waist‐shaped and cylindric inter‐dental brushes was evaluated in a randomized‐controlled, examiner‐blinded, two‐period crossover study by assessment of the Turesky modification of Quigley‐Hein plaque index (T‐QHI) and the papillary bleeding index (PBI) at four sites per tooth. RESULTS: Seventeen probands with 1,474 tooth sites finished the study. At baseline, median of overall T‐QHI scores was 1.4 (interquartile range 1.38–1.92). After 1 month, T‐QHI for waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes was 1.24 (1.03–1.52); in 15 individuals, T‐QHI 0 was the grade most often measured. T‐QHI for cylindric brushes was 1.71 (1.18–2.29; p = .042), with T‐QHI 0 being the grade most often measured only in seven individuals. The odds ratio for establishing plaque‐free inter‐dental sites with waist‐shaped relative to cylindric brushes was 1.8 [95% CI 1.6–1.9] (p < .001; logistic regression analysis). There were no statistically significant differences between PBI levels of waist‐shaped and cylindric brushes. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated the superiority in cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped over cylindric inter‐dental brushes in individuals receiving supportive periodontal treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6972641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69726412020-01-27 Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study Schnabl, Dagmar Goebel, Georg Kadletz, Alice Gaenzer, Hanna Steiner, René Laimer, Johannes Kapferer‐Seebacher, Ines J Clin Periodontol Periodontal Therapy OBJECTIVE: To compare the cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped versus cylindric inter‐dental brushes in patients receiving supportive periodontal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After sample size estimation, 20 periodontal maintenance patients diagnosed with periodontitis stage 3 were recruited. Brushing efficacy of waist‐shaped and cylindric inter‐dental brushes was evaluated in a randomized‐controlled, examiner‐blinded, two‐period crossover study by assessment of the Turesky modification of Quigley‐Hein plaque index (T‐QHI) and the papillary bleeding index (PBI) at four sites per tooth. RESULTS: Seventeen probands with 1,474 tooth sites finished the study. At baseline, median of overall T‐QHI scores was 1.4 (interquartile range 1.38–1.92). After 1 month, T‐QHI for waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes was 1.24 (1.03–1.52); in 15 individuals, T‐QHI 0 was the grade most often measured. T‐QHI for cylindric brushes was 1.71 (1.18–2.29; p = .042), with T‐QHI 0 being the grade most often measured only in seven individuals. The odds ratio for establishing plaque‐free inter‐dental sites with waist‐shaped relative to cylindric brushes was 1.8 [95% CI 1.6–1.9] (p < .001; logistic regression analysis). There were no statistically significant differences between PBI levels of waist‐shaped and cylindric brushes. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated the superiority in cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped over cylindric inter‐dental brushes in individuals receiving supportive periodontal treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-03 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6972641/ /pubmed/31609489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13210 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Periodontal Therapy
Schnabl, Dagmar
Goebel, Georg
Kadletz, Alice
Gaenzer, Hanna
Steiner, René
Laimer, Johannes
Kapferer‐Seebacher, Ines
Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study
title Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study
title_full Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study
title_fullStr Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study
title_short Cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. A randomized‐controlled crossover study
title_sort cleansing efficacy of waist‐shaped inter‐dental brushes. a randomized‐controlled crossover study
topic Periodontal Therapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13210
work_keys_str_mv AT schnabldagmar cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT goebelgeorg cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT kadletzalice cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT gaenzerhanna cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT steinerrene cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT laimerjohannes cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT kapfererseebacherines cleansingefficacyofwaistshapedinterdentalbrushesarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy