Cargando…

Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs

We developed an artificial intelligence algorithm (AIA) for smartphones to determine the severity of facial acne using the GEA scale and to identify different types of acne lesion (comedonal, inflammatory) and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIHP) or residual hyperpigmentation. Overall, 5972 ima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seité, Sophie, Khammari, Amir, Benzaquen, Michael, Moyal, Dominique, Dréno, Brigitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.14022
_version_ 1783489879972249600
author Seité, Sophie
Khammari, Amir
Benzaquen, Michael
Moyal, Dominique
Dréno, Brigitte
author_facet Seité, Sophie
Khammari, Amir
Benzaquen, Michael
Moyal, Dominique
Dréno, Brigitte
author_sort Seité, Sophie
collection PubMed
description We developed an artificial intelligence algorithm (AIA) for smartphones to determine the severity of facial acne using the GEA scale and to identify different types of acne lesion (comedonal, inflammatory) and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIHP) or residual hyperpigmentation. Overall, 5972 images (face, right and left profiles) obtained with smartphones (IOS and/or Android) from 1072 acne patients were collected. Three trained dermatologists assessed the acne severity for each patient. One acne severity grade per patient (grade given by the majority of the three dermatologists from the two sets of three images) was used to train the algorithm. Acne lesion identification was performed from a subgroup of 348 images using a tagging tool; tagged images served to train the algorithm. The algorithm evolved and was adjusted for sensibility, specificity and correlation using new images. The correlation between the GEA grade and the quantification and qualification of acne lesions both by the AIA and the experts for each image were evaluated for all AIA versions. At final version 6, the GEA grading provided by AIA reached 68% and was similar to that provided by the dermatologists. Between version 4 and version 6, AIA improved precision results multiplied by 1.5 for inflammatory lesions, 2.5 for non‐inflammatory lesions and by 2 for PIHP; recall was improved by 2.6, 1.6 and 2.7. The weighted average of precision and recall or F1 score was 84% for inflammatory lesions, 61% for non‐inflammatory lesions and 72% for PIHP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6972662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69726622020-01-27 Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs Seité, Sophie Khammari, Amir Benzaquen, Michael Moyal, Dominique Dréno, Brigitte Exp Dermatol Original Articles We developed an artificial intelligence algorithm (AIA) for smartphones to determine the severity of facial acne using the GEA scale and to identify different types of acne lesion (comedonal, inflammatory) and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIHP) or residual hyperpigmentation. Overall, 5972 images (face, right and left profiles) obtained with smartphones (IOS and/or Android) from 1072 acne patients were collected. Three trained dermatologists assessed the acne severity for each patient. One acne severity grade per patient (grade given by the majority of the three dermatologists from the two sets of three images) was used to train the algorithm. Acne lesion identification was performed from a subgroup of 348 images using a tagging tool; tagged images served to train the algorithm. The algorithm evolved and was adjusted for sensibility, specificity and correlation using new images. The correlation between the GEA grade and the quantification and qualification of acne lesions both by the AIA and the experts for each image were evaluated for all AIA versions. At final version 6, the GEA grading provided by AIA reached 68% and was similar to that provided by the dermatologists. Between version 4 and version 6, AIA improved precision results multiplied by 1.5 for inflammatory lesions, 2.5 for non‐inflammatory lesions and by 2 for PIHP; recall was improved by 2.6, 1.6 and 2.7. The weighted average of precision and recall or F1 score was 84% for inflammatory lesions, 61% for non‐inflammatory lesions and 72% for PIHP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-09 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6972662/ /pubmed/31446631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.14022 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Seité, Sophie
Khammari, Amir
Benzaquen, Michael
Moyal, Dominique
Dréno, Brigitte
Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
title Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
title_full Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
title_fullStr Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
title_full_unstemmed Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
title_short Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
title_sort development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.14022
work_keys_str_mv AT seitesophie developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs
AT khammariamir developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs
AT benzaquenmichael developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs
AT moyaldominique developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs
AT drenobrigitte developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs