Cargando…
Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs
We developed an artificial intelligence algorithm (AIA) for smartphones to determine the severity of facial acne using the GEA scale and to identify different types of acne lesion (comedonal, inflammatory) and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIHP) or residual hyperpigmentation. Overall, 5972 ima...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.14022 |
_version_ | 1783489879972249600 |
---|---|
author | Seité, Sophie Khammari, Amir Benzaquen, Michael Moyal, Dominique Dréno, Brigitte |
author_facet | Seité, Sophie Khammari, Amir Benzaquen, Michael Moyal, Dominique Dréno, Brigitte |
author_sort | Seité, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | We developed an artificial intelligence algorithm (AIA) for smartphones to determine the severity of facial acne using the GEA scale and to identify different types of acne lesion (comedonal, inflammatory) and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIHP) or residual hyperpigmentation. Overall, 5972 images (face, right and left profiles) obtained with smartphones (IOS and/or Android) from 1072 acne patients were collected. Three trained dermatologists assessed the acne severity for each patient. One acne severity grade per patient (grade given by the majority of the three dermatologists from the two sets of three images) was used to train the algorithm. Acne lesion identification was performed from a subgroup of 348 images using a tagging tool; tagged images served to train the algorithm. The algorithm evolved and was adjusted for sensibility, specificity and correlation using new images. The correlation between the GEA grade and the quantification and qualification of acne lesions both by the AIA and the experts for each image were evaluated for all AIA versions. At final version 6, the GEA grading provided by AIA reached 68% and was similar to that provided by the dermatologists. Between version 4 and version 6, AIA improved precision results multiplied by 1.5 for inflammatory lesions, 2.5 for non‐inflammatory lesions and by 2 for PIHP; recall was improved by 2.6, 1.6 and 2.7. The weighted average of precision and recall or F1 score was 84% for inflammatory lesions, 61% for non‐inflammatory lesions and 72% for PIHP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6972662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69726622020-01-27 Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs Seité, Sophie Khammari, Amir Benzaquen, Michael Moyal, Dominique Dréno, Brigitte Exp Dermatol Original Articles We developed an artificial intelligence algorithm (AIA) for smartphones to determine the severity of facial acne using the GEA scale and to identify different types of acne lesion (comedonal, inflammatory) and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIHP) or residual hyperpigmentation. Overall, 5972 images (face, right and left profiles) obtained with smartphones (IOS and/or Android) from 1072 acne patients were collected. Three trained dermatologists assessed the acne severity for each patient. One acne severity grade per patient (grade given by the majority of the three dermatologists from the two sets of three images) was used to train the algorithm. Acne lesion identification was performed from a subgroup of 348 images using a tagging tool; tagged images served to train the algorithm. The algorithm evolved and was adjusted for sensibility, specificity and correlation using new images. The correlation between the GEA grade and the quantification and qualification of acne lesions both by the AIA and the experts for each image were evaluated for all AIA versions. At final version 6, the GEA grading provided by AIA reached 68% and was similar to that provided by the dermatologists. Between version 4 and version 6, AIA improved precision results multiplied by 1.5 for inflammatory lesions, 2.5 for non‐inflammatory lesions and by 2 for PIHP; recall was improved by 2.6, 1.6 and 2.7. The weighted average of precision and recall or F1 score was 84% for inflammatory lesions, 61% for non‐inflammatory lesions and 72% for PIHP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-09 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6972662/ /pubmed/31446631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.14022 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Seité, Sophie Khammari, Amir Benzaquen, Michael Moyal, Dominique Dréno, Brigitte Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
title | Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
title_full | Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
title_fullStr | Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
title_short | Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
title_sort | development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for acne grading from smartphone photographs |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6972662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.14022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seitesophie developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs AT khammariamir developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs AT benzaquenmichael developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs AT moyaldominique developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs AT drenobrigitte developmentandaccuracyofanartificialintelligencealgorithmforacnegradingfromsmartphonephotographs |