Cargando…

Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?

To date, blood (and serum) as well as urine samples are the most commonly collected specimens for routine doping controls, which allow for the analytical coverage of an extensive set of target analytes relevant to sports drug testing programs. In the course of studies to identify potential alternati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garzinsky, Ann‐Marie, Walpurgis, Katja, Krug, Oliver, Thevis, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.2597
_version_ 1783489965595820032
author Garzinsky, Ann‐Marie
Walpurgis, Katja
Krug, Oliver
Thevis, Mario
author_facet Garzinsky, Ann‐Marie
Walpurgis, Katja
Krug, Oliver
Thevis, Mario
author_sort Garzinsky, Ann‐Marie
collection PubMed
description To date, blood (and serum) as well as urine samples are the most commonly collected specimens for routine doping controls, which allow for the analytical coverage of an extensive set of target analytes relevant to sports drug testing programs. In the course of studies to identify potential alternative matrices to complement current testing approaches, exhaled breath (EB) has been found to offer advantageous properties especially with regard to the sample collection procedure, which is less invasive, less intrusive, and less time‐consuming when compared to conventional blood and urine testing. A yet unaddressed question has been the potential contribution of oral fluid (OF) to EB samples. The current investigation focused on characterizing an electret membrane‐based EB collection device concerning a potential introduction of OF during the sampling procedure. For that purpose, EB and OF samples collected under varying conditions from a total of 14 healthy volunteers were tested for the presence of abundant salivary proteins using bottom‐up proteomics approaches such as SDS‐PAGE followed by tryptic digestion and chromatographic‐mass spectrometric analysis. The trapping baffles integrated into the mouthpiece of the EB collection device were found to effectively retain OF introduced into the unit during sample collection as no saliva breakthrough was detectable using the established analytical approach targeting predominantly the highly abundant salivary α‐amylase. Since α‐amylase was found unaffected by storage, smoking, food intake, and exercise, it appears to be a useful marker to reveal possible OF contaminations of EB collection devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6973055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69730552020-01-27 Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane? Garzinsky, Ann‐Marie Walpurgis, Katja Krug, Oliver Thevis, Mario Drug Test Anal Special Issue ‐ Short Communication To date, blood (and serum) as well as urine samples are the most commonly collected specimens for routine doping controls, which allow for the analytical coverage of an extensive set of target analytes relevant to sports drug testing programs. In the course of studies to identify potential alternative matrices to complement current testing approaches, exhaled breath (EB) has been found to offer advantageous properties especially with regard to the sample collection procedure, which is less invasive, less intrusive, and less time‐consuming when compared to conventional blood and urine testing. A yet unaddressed question has been the potential contribution of oral fluid (OF) to EB samples. The current investigation focused on characterizing an electret membrane‐based EB collection device concerning a potential introduction of OF during the sampling procedure. For that purpose, EB and OF samples collected under varying conditions from a total of 14 healthy volunteers were tested for the presence of abundant salivary proteins using bottom‐up proteomics approaches such as SDS‐PAGE followed by tryptic digestion and chromatographic‐mass spectrometric analysis. The trapping baffles integrated into the mouthpiece of the EB collection device were found to effectively retain OF introduced into the unit during sample collection as no saliva breakthrough was detectable using the established analytical approach targeting predominantly the highly abundant salivary α‐amylase. Since α‐amylase was found unaffected by storage, smoking, food intake, and exercise, it appears to be a useful marker to reveal possible OF contaminations of EB collection devices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-23 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6973055/ /pubmed/30927335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.2597 Text en © 2019 The Authors Drug Testing and Analysis Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Special Issue ‐ Short Communication
Garzinsky, Ann‐Marie
Walpurgis, Katja
Krug, Oliver
Thevis, Mario
Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
title Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
title_full Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
title_fullStr Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
title_full_unstemmed Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
title_short Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
title_sort does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane?
topic Special Issue ‐ Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.2597
work_keys_str_mv AT garzinskyannmarie doesoralfluidcontributetoexhaledbreathsamplescollectedbymeansofanelectretmembrane
AT walpurgiskatja doesoralfluidcontributetoexhaledbreathsamplescollectedbymeansofanelectretmembrane
AT krugoliver doesoralfluidcontributetoexhaledbreathsamplescollectedbymeansofanelectretmembrane
AT thevismario doesoralfluidcontributetoexhaledbreathsamplescollectedbymeansofanelectretmembrane