Cargando…
Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test
BACKGROUND: Serum canine pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI) concentrations have become the standard laboratory test used to diagnose canine pancreatitis. Recently, a new point‐of‐care assay for cPLI, the VetScan cPL rapid test (VetScan cPL), has become available, but analytical validation dat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12796 |
_version_ | 1783489982527176704 |
---|---|
author | Steiner, Joerg M. Guadiano, Phillip Gomez, Robynne R. Suchodolski, Jan S. Lidbury, Jonathan A. |
author_facet | Steiner, Joerg M. Guadiano, Phillip Gomez, Robynne R. Suchodolski, Jan S. Lidbury, Jonathan A. |
author_sort | Steiner, Joerg M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Serum canine pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI) concentrations have become the standard laboratory test used to diagnose canine pancreatitis. Recently, a new point‐of‐care assay for cPLI, the VetScan cPL rapid test (VetScan cPL), has become available, but analytical validation data have not yet been published. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL. METHODS: Leftover serum samples from a diagnostic laboratory were used. Adherence to the manufacturer's guidelines, linearity, repeatability, and reproducibility were evaluated. Results of the VetScan cPL were correlated with the Spec cPL results. RESULTS: Observed‐to‐expected ratios for dilutional parallelism ranged from 77.4% to 162.9% (mean 119.3%). Intra‐assay and inter‐assay variabilities ranged from 16.9% to 36.7% (mean 25.1%) and from 14.1% to 51.2% (mean 31.8%), respectively. Adherence to the manufacturer's specification regarding results within ± 60 µg/L of the Spec cPL result was only achieved for 39% of the measurements. The VetScan cPL and Spec cPL correlation showed a Spearman's r of .758 for 29 data pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the VetScan cPL did not adhere to the manufacturer's specifications for most measurements. Also, the VetScan cPL showed suboptimal linearity and was not precise. In conclusion, the VetScan cPL failed basic analytical validation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6973129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69731292020-01-27 Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test Steiner, Joerg M. Guadiano, Phillip Gomez, Robynne R. Suchodolski, Jan S. Lidbury, Jonathan A. Vet Clin Pathol Clinical Chemistry BACKGROUND: Serum canine pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI) concentrations have become the standard laboratory test used to diagnose canine pancreatitis. Recently, a new point‐of‐care assay for cPLI, the VetScan cPL rapid test (VetScan cPL), has become available, but analytical validation data have not yet been published. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL. METHODS: Leftover serum samples from a diagnostic laboratory were used. Adherence to the manufacturer's guidelines, linearity, repeatability, and reproducibility were evaluated. Results of the VetScan cPL were correlated with the Spec cPL results. RESULTS: Observed‐to‐expected ratios for dilutional parallelism ranged from 77.4% to 162.9% (mean 119.3%). Intra‐assay and inter‐assay variabilities ranged from 16.9% to 36.7% (mean 25.1%) and from 14.1% to 51.2% (mean 31.8%), respectively. Adherence to the manufacturer's specification regarding results within ± 60 µg/L of the Spec cPL result was only achieved for 39% of the measurements. The VetScan cPL and Spec cPL correlation showed a Spearman's r of .758 for 29 data pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the VetScan cPL did not adhere to the manufacturer's specifications for most measurements. Also, the VetScan cPL showed suboptimal linearity and was not precise. In conclusion, the VetScan cPL failed basic analytical validation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-06 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6973129/ /pubmed/31692006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12796 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Clinical Pathology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Chemistry Steiner, Joerg M. Guadiano, Phillip Gomez, Robynne R. Suchodolski, Jan S. Lidbury, Jonathan A. Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test |
title | Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test |
title_full | Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test |
title_fullStr | Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test |
title_full_unstemmed | Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test |
title_short | Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test |
title_sort | partial analytical validation of the vetscan cpl rapid test |
topic | Clinical Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinerjoergm partialanalyticalvalidationofthevetscancplrapidtest AT guadianophillip partialanalyticalvalidationofthevetscancplrapidtest AT gomezrobynner partialanalyticalvalidationofthevetscancplrapidtest AT suchodolskijans partialanalyticalvalidationofthevetscancplrapidtest AT lidburyjonathana partialanalyticalvalidationofthevetscancplrapidtest |