Cargando…

Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer whether a risk factor causally affects a health outcome. Meta‐analysis has been used historically in MR to combine results from separate epidemiological studies, with each study using a small but select group of ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowden, Jack, Holmes, Michael V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1346
_version_ 1783490010131988480
author Bowden, Jack
Holmes, Michael V.
author_facet Bowden, Jack
Holmes, Michael V.
author_sort Bowden, Jack
collection PubMed
description Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer whether a risk factor causally affects a health outcome. Meta‐analysis has been used historically in MR to combine results from separate epidemiological studies, with each study using a small but select group of genetic variants. In recent years, it has been used to combine genome‐wide association study (GWAS) summary data for large numbers of genetic variants. Heterogeneity among the causal estimates obtained from multiple genetic variants points to a possible violation of the necessary instrumental variable assumptions. In this article, we provide a basic introduction to MR and the instrumental variable theory that it relies upon. We then describe how random effects models, meta‐regression, and robust regression are being used to test and adjust for heterogeneity in order to improve the rigor of the MR approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6973275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69732752020-01-28 Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review Bowden, Jack Holmes, Michael V. Res Synth Methods Review Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer whether a risk factor causally affects a health outcome. Meta‐analysis has been used historically in MR to combine results from separate epidemiological studies, with each study using a small but select group of genetic variants. In recent years, it has been used to combine genome‐wide association study (GWAS) summary data for large numbers of genetic variants. Heterogeneity among the causal estimates obtained from multiple genetic variants points to a possible violation of the necessary instrumental variable assumptions. In this article, we provide a basic introduction to MR and the instrumental variable theory that it relies upon. We then describe how random effects models, meta‐regression, and robust regression are being used to test and adjust for heterogeneity in order to improve the rigor of the MR approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-23 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6973275/ /pubmed/30861319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1346 Text en © 2019 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Bowden, Jack
Holmes, Michael V.
Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
title Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
title_full Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
title_fullStr Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
title_full_unstemmed Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
title_short Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
title_sort meta‐analysis and mendelian randomization: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1346
work_keys_str_mv AT bowdenjack metaanalysisandmendelianrandomizationareview
AT holmesmichaelv metaanalysisandmendelianrandomizationareview