Cargando…

Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect on perinatal outcome of different fetal monitoring strategies for early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: This was a cohort analysis of individual participant data from two European multicenter trials of fetal monitoring methods for FGR: the Growth Restr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganzevoort, W., Thornton, J. G., Marlow, N., Thilaganathan, B., Arabin, B., Prefumo, F., Lees, C., Wolf, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.20354
_version_ 1783490013200121856
author Ganzevoort, W.
Thornton, J. G.
Marlow, N.
Thilaganathan, B.
Arabin, B.
Prefumo, F.
Lees, C.
Wolf, H.
author_facet Ganzevoort, W.
Thornton, J. G.
Marlow, N.
Thilaganathan, B.
Arabin, B.
Prefumo, F.
Lees, C.
Wolf, H.
author_sort Ganzevoort, W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect on perinatal outcome of different fetal monitoring strategies for early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: This was a cohort analysis of individual participant data from two European multicenter trials of fetal monitoring methods for FGR: the Growth Restriction Intervention Study (GRIT) and the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). All women from GRIT (n = 238) and TRUFFLE (n = 503) who were randomized between 26 and 32 weeks' gestation were included. The women were grouped according to intervention and monitoring method: immediate delivery (GRIT) or delayed delivery with monitoring by conventional cardiotocography (CTG) (GRIT), computerized CTG (cCTG) only (GRIT and TRUFFLE) or cCTG and ductus venosus (DV) Doppler (TRUFFLE). The primary outcome was survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of age. RESULTS: Gestational age at delivery and birth weight were similar in both studies. Fetal death rate was similar between the GRIT and TRUFFLE groups, but neonatal and late death were more frequent in GRIT (18% vs 6%; P < 0.01). The rate of survival without impairment at 2 years was lowest in pregnancies that underwent immediate delivery (70% (95% CI, 61–78%)) or delayed delivery with monitoring by CTG (69% (95% CI, 57–82%)), increased in those monitored using cCTG only in both GRIT (80% (95% CI, 68–91%)) and TRUFFLE (77% (95% CI, 70–84%)), and was highest in pregnancies monitored using cCTG and DV Doppler (84% (95% CI, 80–89%)) (P < 0.01 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the hypothesis that the optimal method for fetal monitoring in pregnancies complicated by early‐onset FGR is a combination of cCTG and DV Doppler assessment. Trial Registration: GRIT ISRCTN41358726 and TRUFFLE ISRCTN56204499. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6973288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69732882020-01-28 Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials Ganzevoort, W. Thornton, J. G. Marlow, N. Thilaganathan, B. Arabin, B. Prefumo, F. Lees, C. Wolf, H. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect on perinatal outcome of different fetal monitoring strategies for early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: This was a cohort analysis of individual participant data from two European multicenter trials of fetal monitoring methods for FGR: the Growth Restriction Intervention Study (GRIT) and the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). All women from GRIT (n = 238) and TRUFFLE (n = 503) who were randomized between 26 and 32 weeks' gestation were included. The women were grouped according to intervention and monitoring method: immediate delivery (GRIT) or delayed delivery with monitoring by conventional cardiotocography (CTG) (GRIT), computerized CTG (cCTG) only (GRIT and TRUFFLE) or cCTG and ductus venosus (DV) Doppler (TRUFFLE). The primary outcome was survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of age. RESULTS: Gestational age at delivery and birth weight were similar in both studies. Fetal death rate was similar between the GRIT and TRUFFLE groups, but neonatal and late death were more frequent in GRIT (18% vs 6%; P < 0.01). The rate of survival without impairment at 2 years was lowest in pregnancies that underwent immediate delivery (70% (95% CI, 61–78%)) or delayed delivery with monitoring by CTG (69% (95% CI, 57–82%)), increased in those monitored using cCTG only in both GRIT (80% (95% CI, 68–91%)) and TRUFFLE (77% (95% CI, 70–84%)), and was highest in pregnancies monitored using cCTG and DV Doppler (84% (95% CI, 80–89%)) (P < 0.01 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the hypothesis that the optimal method for fetal monitoring in pregnancies complicated by early‐onset FGR is a combination of cCTG and DV Doppler assessment. Trial Registration: GRIT ISRCTN41358726 and TRUFFLE ISRCTN56204499. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-01-01 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6973288/ /pubmed/31125465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.20354 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Ganzevoort, W.
Thornton, J. G.
Marlow, N.
Thilaganathan, B.
Arabin, B.
Prefumo, F.
Lees, C.
Wolf, H.
Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials
title Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials
title_full Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials
title_short Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials
title_sort comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in grit and truffle trials
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.20354
work_keys_str_mv AT ganzevoortw comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT thorntonjg comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT marlown comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT thilaganathanb comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT arabinb comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT prefumof comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT leesc comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT wolfh comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials
AT comparativeanalysisof2yearoutcomesingritandtruffletrials