Cargando…

Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation

Dehydration of cells by acute hyperosmotic stress has profound effects upon cell structure and function. Interphase chromatin and mitotic chromosomes collapse (“congelation”). HL-60/S4 cells remain ~100% viable for, at least, 1 hour, exhibiting shrinkage to ~2/3 their original volume, when placed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olins, Ada L., Gould, Travis J., Boyd, Logan, Sarg, Bettina, Olins, Donald E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2019.1710321
_version_ 1783490019285008384
author Olins, Ada L.
Gould, Travis J.
Boyd, Logan
Sarg, Bettina
Olins, Donald E.
author_facet Olins, Ada L.
Gould, Travis J.
Boyd, Logan
Sarg, Bettina
Olins, Donald E.
author_sort Olins, Ada L.
collection PubMed
description Dehydration of cells by acute hyperosmotic stress has profound effects upon cell structure and function. Interphase chromatin and mitotic chromosomes collapse (“congelation”). HL-60/S4 cells remain ~100% viable for, at least, 1 hour, exhibiting shrinkage to ~2/3 their original volume, when placed in 300mM sucrose in tissue culture medium. Fixed cells were imaged by immunostaining confocal and STED microscopy. At a “global” structural level (μm), mitotic chromosomes congeal into a residual gel with apparent (phase) separations of Ki67, CTCF, SMC2, RAD21, H1 histones and HMG proteins. At an “intermediate” level (sub-μm), radial distribution analysis of STED images revealed a most probable peak DNA density separation of ~0.16 μm, essentially unchanged by hyperosmotic stress. At a “local” structural level (~1-2 nm), in vivo crosslinking revealed essentially unchanged crosslinked products between H1, HMG and inner histones. Hyperosmotic cellular stress is discussed in terms of concepts of mitotic chromosome structure and liquid-liquid phase separation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6973338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69733382020-01-31 Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation Olins, Ada L. Gould, Travis J. Boyd, Logan Sarg, Bettina Olins, Donald E. Nucleus Research Paper Dehydration of cells by acute hyperosmotic stress has profound effects upon cell structure and function. Interphase chromatin and mitotic chromosomes collapse (“congelation”). HL-60/S4 cells remain ~100% viable for, at least, 1 hour, exhibiting shrinkage to ~2/3 their original volume, when placed in 300mM sucrose in tissue culture medium. Fixed cells were imaged by immunostaining confocal and STED microscopy. At a “global” structural level (μm), mitotic chromosomes congeal into a residual gel with apparent (phase) separations of Ki67, CTCF, SMC2, RAD21, H1 histones and HMG proteins. At an “intermediate” level (sub-μm), radial distribution analysis of STED images revealed a most probable peak DNA density separation of ~0.16 μm, essentially unchanged by hyperosmotic stress. At a “local” structural level (~1-2 nm), in vivo crosslinking revealed essentially unchanged crosslinked products between H1, HMG and inner histones. Hyperosmotic cellular stress is discussed in terms of concepts of mitotic chromosome structure and liquid-liquid phase separation. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6973338/ /pubmed/31924112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2019.1710321 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Olins, Ada L.
Gould, Travis J.
Boyd, Logan
Sarg, Bettina
Olins, Donald E.
Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
title Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
title_full Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
title_fullStr Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
title_full_unstemmed Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
title_short Hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
title_sort hyperosmotic stress: in situ chromatin phase separation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2019.1710321
work_keys_str_mv AT olinsadal hyperosmoticstressinsituchromatinphaseseparation
AT gouldtravisj hyperosmoticstressinsituchromatinphaseseparation
AT boydlogan hyperosmoticstressinsituchromatinphaseseparation
AT sargbettina hyperosmoticstressinsituchromatinphaseseparation
AT olinsdonalde hyperosmoticstressinsituchromatinphaseseparation