Cargando…

Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research

Background: Informed consent is a basic ethical requirement of clinical research, yet deficiencies have been documented in the comprehension of its components among trial participants. Pregnancy research is sparsely conducted. Assessment of understanding of the informed consent among pregnant women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atal, Shubham, Dunne, Fidelma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002505
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12811.1
_version_ 1783490052624482304
author Atal, Shubham
Dunne, Fidelma
author_facet Atal, Shubham
Dunne, Fidelma
author_sort Atal, Shubham
collection PubMed
description Background: Informed consent is a basic ethical requirement of clinical research, yet deficiencies have been documented in the comprehension of its components among trial participants. Pregnancy research is sparsely conducted. Assessment of understanding of the informed consent among pregnant women suffering from Gestational Diabetes Mellitus enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, and their experiences was planned. Methodology: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted among participants of EMERGE clinical trial at the University Hospital, Galway. Willing participants allowed observation of their consent encounters. They completed the standard QuIC questionnaire at follow up visits for assessment of objective and subjective understanding of informed consent, and reasons to participate and level of satisfaction. Data was entered and analysed using Microsoft Office Excel and Minitab version 18. Results: The most commonly asked questions asked in the twenty consent encounters observed were focused upon the safety of the study drug for the developing foetuses and women. The general attitude of the women was positive towards participation. The mean objective understanding score was 72.43 ± 7 and the subjective understanding score was 91.67 ± 8.68 (out of 100). Critical components of consent like voluntarism, randomisation, withdrawal, and benefit to others were well understood. The domains related to nonstandard nature of treatment, additional risks/discomforts and compensation were poorly understood. The women cited the desire to provide benefit to future patients as the most common reason to participate, and most were satisfied with the consent process. Conclusion: Comprehension of informed consent is good in most aspects, but the grasp of certain concepts is poor among the pregnant women. Efforts are needed to improve informed consent through engagement of investigators, research nurses and possibly, the use of a decision aid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6973531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69735312020-01-29 Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research Atal, Shubham Dunne, Fidelma HRB Open Res Research Article Background: Informed consent is a basic ethical requirement of clinical research, yet deficiencies have been documented in the comprehension of its components among trial participants. Pregnancy research is sparsely conducted. Assessment of understanding of the informed consent among pregnant women suffering from Gestational Diabetes Mellitus enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, and their experiences was planned. Methodology: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted among participants of EMERGE clinical trial at the University Hospital, Galway. Willing participants allowed observation of their consent encounters. They completed the standard QuIC questionnaire at follow up visits for assessment of objective and subjective understanding of informed consent, and reasons to participate and level of satisfaction. Data was entered and analysed using Microsoft Office Excel and Minitab version 18. Results: The most commonly asked questions asked in the twenty consent encounters observed were focused upon the safety of the study drug for the developing foetuses and women. The general attitude of the women was positive towards participation. The mean objective understanding score was 72.43 ± 7 and the subjective understanding score was 91.67 ± 8.68 (out of 100). Critical components of consent like voluntarism, randomisation, withdrawal, and benefit to others were well understood. The domains related to nonstandard nature of treatment, additional risks/discomforts and compensation were poorly understood. The women cited the desire to provide benefit to future patients as the most common reason to participate, and most were satisfied with the consent process. Conclusion: Comprehension of informed consent is good in most aspects, but the grasp of certain concepts is poor among the pregnant women. Efforts are needed to improve informed consent through engagement of investigators, research nurses and possibly, the use of a decision aid. F1000 Research Limited 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6973531/ /pubmed/32002505 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12811.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Atal S and Dunne F http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Atal, Shubham
Dunne, Fidelma
Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research
title Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research
title_full Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research
title_fullStr Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research
title_short Assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) research
title_sort assessment of the understanding of informed consent including participants’ experiences, and generation of a supplemental consent decision aid for gestational diabetes mellitus (gdm) research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002505
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12811.1
work_keys_str_mv AT atalshubham assessmentoftheunderstandingofinformedconsentincludingparticipantsexperiencesandgenerationofasupplementalconsentdecisionaidforgestationaldiabetesmellitusgdmresearch
AT dunnefidelma assessmentoftheunderstandingofinformedconsentincludingparticipantsexperiencesandgenerationofasupplementalconsentdecisionaidforgestationaldiabetesmellitusgdmresearch