Cargando…
Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting
Background: Childhood obesity prevention interventions delivered by health professionals during the first 1,000 days of life show some evidence of effectiveness, particularly in relation to behavioural outcomes. External validity refers to how generalisable interventions are to populations or settin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002513 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12924.2 |
_version_ | 1783490053323882496 |
---|---|
author | Hennessy, Marita Heary, Caroline Laws, Rachel Van Rhoon, Luke Toomey, Elaine Wolstenholme, Hazel Byrne, Molly |
author_facet | Hennessy, Marita Heary, Caroline Laws, Rachel Van Rhoon, Luke Toomey, Elaine Wolstenholme, Hazel Byrne, Molly |
author_sort | Hennessy, Marita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Childhood obesity prevention interventions delivered by health professionals during the first 1,000 days of life show some evidence of effectiveness, particularly in relation to behavioural outcomes. External validity refers to how generalisable interventions are to populations or settings beyond those in the original study. The degree to which external validity elements are reported in such studies is unclear however. This systematic review aimed to determine the extent to which childhood obesity interventions delivered by health professionals during the first 1,000 days report on elements that can be used to inform generalizability across settings and populations. Methods: Eligible studies meeting study inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified through a systematic review of 11 databases and three trial registers. An assessment tool based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to assess the external validity of included studies. It comprised five dimensions: reach and representativeness of individuals, reach and representativeness of settings, implementation and adaptation, outcomes for decision making maintenance and/or institutionalisation. Two authors independently assessed the external validity reporting of 20% of included studies; discrepancies were resolved, and then one completed assessments of the remaining studies. Results: In total, 39 trials involving 46 interventions published between 1999 and 2019 were identified. The majority of studies were randomized controlled trials (n=24). Reporting varied within and between dimensions. External validity elements that were poorly described included: representativeness of individuals and settings, treatment receipt, intervention mechanisms and moderators, cost effectiveness, and intervention sustainability and acceptability. Conclusions: Our review suggests that more emphasis is needed on research designs that consider generalisability, and the reporting of external validity elements in early life childhood obesity prevention interventions. Important gaps in external validity reporting were identified that could facilitate decisions around the translation and scale-up of interventions from research to practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6973534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69735342020-01-29 Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting Hennessy, Marita Heary, Caroline Laws, Rachel Van Rhoon, Luke Toomey, Elaine Wolstenholme, Hazel Byrne, Molly HRB Open Res Systematic Review Background: Childhood obesity prevention interventions delivered by health professionals during the first 1,000 days of life show some evidence of effectiveness, particularly in relation to behavioural outcomes. External validity refers to how generalisable interventions are to populations or settings beyond those in the original study. The degree to which external validity elements are reported in such studies is unclear however. This systematic review aimed to determine the extent to which childhood obesity interventions delivered by health professionals during the first 1,000 days report on elements that can be used to inform generalizability across settings and populations. Methods: Eligible studies meeting study inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified through a systematic review of 11 databases and three trial registers. An assessment tool based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to assess the external validity of included studies. It comprised five dimensions: reach and representativeness of individuals, reach and representativeness of settings, implementation and adaptation, outcomes for decision making maintenance and/or institutionalisation. Two authors independently assessed the external validity reporting of 20% of included studies; discrepancies were resolved, and then one completed assessments of the remaining studies. Results: In total, 39 trials involving 46 interventions published between 1999 and 2019 were identified. The majority of studies were randomized controlled trials (n=24). Reporting varied within and between dimensions. External validity elements that were poorly described included: representativeness of individuals and settings, treatment receipt, intervention mechanisms and moderators, cost effectiveness, and intervention sustainability and acceptability. Conclusions: Our review suggests that more emphasis is needed on research designs that consider generalisability, and the reporting of external validity elements in early life childhood obesity prevention interventions. Important gaps in external validity reporting were identified that could facilitate decisions around the translation and scale-up of interventions from research to practice. F1000 Research Limited 2019-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6973534/ /pubmed/32002513 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12924.2 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Hennessy M et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Hennessy, Marita Heary, Caroline Laws, Rachel Van Rhoon, Luke Toomey, Elaine Wolstenholme, Hazel Byrne, Molly Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting |
title | Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting |
title_full | Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting |
title_fullStr | Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting |
title_full_unstemmed | Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting |
title_short | Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting |
title_sort | health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: a systematic review of external validity reporting |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002513 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12924.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hennessymarita healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting AT hearycaroline healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting AT lawsrachel healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting AT vanrhoonluke healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting AT toomeyelaine healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting AT wolstenholmehazel healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting AT byrnemolly healthprofessionaldeliveredobesitypreventioninterventionsduringthefirst1000daysasystematicreviewofexternalvalidityreporting |