Cargando…

Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain

Minimizing the number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can reduce patient burden. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether physical therapists (PTs) can estimate psychological PROM scores in patients with low back pain (LBP) through physical therapy evaluation. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miki, Takahiro, Kondo, Yu, Takebayashi, Tsuneo, Takasaki, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227999
_version_ 1783490060549619712
author Miki, Takahiro
Kondo, Yu
Takebayashi, Tsuneo
Takasaki, Hiroshi
author_facet Miki, Takahiro
Kondo, Yu
Takebayashi, Tsuneo
Takasaki, Hiroshi
author_sort Miki, Takahiro
collection PubMed
description Minimizing the number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can reduce patient burden. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether physical therapists (PTs) can estimate psychological PROM scores in patients with low back pain (LBP) through physical therapy evaluation. The secondary aims were; 1) to investigate whether the clinical experiences of PTs influence correlations between PT estimates and psychological PROM scores, and 2) to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of PT estimates for the psychological features detected by the PROMs. We recruited hospitalized patients owing to LBP, who underwent evaluation by PTs on the initial day of hospitalization. Patients completed PROMs, including the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale immediately before the initial physical therapy session. PTs rated the magnitude of patient kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = not detected at all, 10 = very highly detected) through physical therapy evaluation immediately after the initial session. The PTs were blinded to the PROM results. We categorized PTs into two subgroups (PTs with ≥4 years and those with <4 years of clinical experience). Data from 78 patients (mean [SD] age = 60.5 [16.3] years) and 21 PTs were analyzed. A statistically significant but weak correlation (P = .04, Spearman’s ρ = .24) was detected only in the total PCS scores and PT NRS scores in a dataset of all patients and PTs. Further, there were no statistically significant differences in correlations (all P >.05) between the two subgroups of PTs in all measures. Low sensitivity and high specificity of PT estimates for psychological features through physical therapy evaluation were identified in all PROMs when PT NRS scores were categorized into the binary score by 5 (negative: <5; positive: ≥5).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6974035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69740352020-02-04 Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain Miki, Takahiro Kondo, Yu Takebayashi, Tsuneo Takasaki, Hiroshi PLoS One Research Article Minimizing the number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can reduce patient burden. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether physical therapists (PTs) can estimate psychological PROM scores in patients with low back pain (LBP) through physical therapy evaluation. The secondary aims were; 1) to investigate whether the clinical experiences of PTs influence correlations between PT estimates and psychological PROM scores, and 2) to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of PT estimates for the psychological features detected by the PROMs. We recruited hospitalized patients owing to LBP, who underwent evaluation by PTs on the initial day of hospitalization. Patients completed PROMs, including the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale immediately before the initial physical therapy session. PTs rated the magnitude of patient kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = not detected at all, 10 = very highly detected) through physical therapy evaluation immediately after the initial session. The PTs were blinded to the PROM results. We categorized PTs into two subgroups (PTs with ≥4 years and those with <4 years of clinical experience). Data from 78 patients (mean [SD] age = 60.5 [16.3] years) and 21 PTs were analyzed. A statistically significant but weak correlation (P = .04, Spearman’s ρ = .24) was detected only in the total PCS scores and PT NRS scores in a dataset of all patients and PTs. Further, there were no statistically significant differences in correlations (all P >.05) between the two subgroups of PTs in all measures. Low sensitivity and high specificity of PT estimates for psychological features through physical therapy evaluation were identified in all PROMs when PT NRS scores were categorized into the binary score by 5 (negative: <5; positive: ≥5). Public Library of Science 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6974035/ /pubmed/31961900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227999 Text en © 2020 Miki et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miki, Takahiro
Kondo, Yu
Takebayashi, Tsuneo
Takasaki, Hiroshi
Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
title Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
title_full Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
title_fullStr Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
title_short Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
title_sort difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227999
work_keys_str_mv AT mikitakahiro differencebetweenphysicaltherapistestimationandpsychologicalpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpatientswithlowbackpain
AT kondoyu differencebetweenphysicaltherapistestimationandpsychologicalpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpatientswithlowbackpain
AT takebayashitsuneo differencebetweenphysicaltherapistestimationandpsychologicalpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpatientswithlowbackpain
AT takasakihiroshi differencebetweenphysicaltherapistestimationandpsychologicalpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpatientswithlowbackpain