Cargando…
Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study
Recruiting participants into cancer survivorship research remains a significant challenge. Few studies have tested and compared the relative use of non-clinical online recruitment methods, especially in samples of adult cancer survivors. This paper reports on the feasibility of recruiting a represen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.990 |
_version_ | 1783490084359634944 |
---|---|
author | Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J Pendrous, Rosina Hulbert-Williams, Lee Swash, Brooke |
author_facet | Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J Pendrous, Rosina Hulbert-Williams, Lee Swash, Brooke |
author_sort | Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recruiting participants into cancer survivorship research remains a significant challenge. Few studies have tested and compared the relative use of non-clinical online recruitment methods, especially in samples of adult cancer survivors. This paper reports on the feasibility of recruiting a representative cohort of cancer survivors using online social media. Two hundred participants with cancer diagnosis within the past 12 months were recruited via social media (Facebook, Twitter and Reddit) into a longitudinal questionnaire study. Different methods of online recruitment proved to be more effective than others over time. Paid Facebook boosting, Reddit posts and Twitter advertisements placed by existing cancer charities proved most helpful in reaching our recruitment target (contributing 27%, 22% and 32%, respectively). Recruiting online achieved a more demographically and clinically representative sample for our study: our subject was younger, less heteronormative, including those with a range of clinical diagnoses, primary and recurrence illness, and patients who had both completed and were still receiving treatment. This was certainly not a quick method of sample recruitment but that could have been optimised by focussing only on the three most effective methods described earlier. While we found that online recruitment is significantly lower in cost than traditional recruitment methods, and can reduce some biases, there still remains the potential for some biases (e.g. excluding much older participants) and ethical/methodological issues (e.g. excluding those without access to Internet). We outline our recruitment strategy, retention rates and a cost breakdown in order to guide other researchers considering such methods for future research in cancer survivorship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6974371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69743712020-01-31 Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J Pendrous, Rosina Hulbert-Williams, Lee Swash, Brooke Ecancermedicalscience Research Recruiting participants into cancer survivorship research remains a significant challenge. Few studies have tested and compared the relative use of non-clinical online recruitment methods, especially in samples of adult cancer survivors. This paper reports on the feasibility of recruiting a representative cohort of cancer survivors using online social media. Two hundred participants with cancer diagnosis within the past 12 months were recruited via social media (Facebook, Twitter and Reddit) into a longitudinal questionnaire study. Different methods of online recruitment proved to be more effective than others over time. Paid Facebook boosting, Reddit posts and Twitter advertisements placed by existing cancer charities proved most helpful in reaching our recruitment target (contributing 27%, 22% and 32%, respectively). Recruiting online achieved a more demographically and clinically representative sample for our study: our subject was younger, less heteronormative, including those with a range of clinical diagnoses, primary and recurrence illness, and patients who had both completed and were still receiving treatment. This was certainly not a quick method of sample recruitment but that could have been optimised by focussing only on the three most effective methods described earlier. While we found that online recruitment is significantly lower in cost than traditional recruitment methods, and can reduce some biases, there still remains the potential for some biases (e.g. excluding much older participants) and ethical/methodological issues (e.g. excluding those without access to Internet). We outline our recruitment strategy, retention rates and a cost breakdown in order to guide other researchers considering such methods for future research in cancer survivorship. Cancer Intelligence 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6974371/ /pubmed/32010214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.990 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J Pendrous, Rosina Hulbert-Williams, Lee Swash, Brooke Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
title | Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
title_full | Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
title_fullStr | Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
title_short | Recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
title_sort | recruiting cancer survivors into research studies using online methods: a secondary analysis from an international cancer survivorship cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hulbertwilliamsnicholasj recruitingcancersurvivorsintoresearchstudiesusingonlinemethodsasecondaryanalysisfromaninternationalcancersurvivorshipcohortstudy AT pendrousrosina recruitingcancersurvivorsintoresearchstudiesusingonlinemethodsasecondaryanalysisfromaninternationalcancersurvivorshipcohortstudy AT hulbertwilliamslee recruitingcancersurvivorsintoresearchstudiesusingonlinemethodsasecondaryanalysisfromaninternationalcancersurvivorshipcohortstudy AT swashbrooke recruitingcancersurvivorsintoresearchstudiesusingonlinemethodsasecondaryanalysisfromaninternationalcancersurvivorshipcohortstudy |