Cargando…

Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?

PURPOSE: To determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yiya, He, Zhifen, Mao, Yu, Chen, Hao, Zhou, Jiawei, Hess, Robert F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364
_version_ 1783490118940622848
author Chen, Yiya
He, Zhifen
Mao, Yu
Chen, Hao
Zhou, Jiawei
Hess, Robert F.
author_facet Chen, Yiya
He, Zhifen
Mao, Yu
Chen, Hao
Zhou, Jiawei
Hess, Robert F.
author_sort Chen, Yiya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month period of refractive adaptation, followed by occlusion therapy (i.e., patching their fellow eye with an opaque patch for 4 h/day). Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye and interocular suppression were measured before and after 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months of occlusion therapy. We quantified interocular suppression with a binocular phase combination task. RESULTS: Visual acuity (in logMAR) improved from 0.50 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD) to 0.33 ± 0.20 for patients who finished a short-term (2 months) occlusion (A1–A10), from 0.53 ± 0.20 to 0.32 ± 0.22 for patients who finished a medium-term (4 months) occlusion (A1–A9), and from 0.48 ± 0.19 to 0.22 ± 0.10 for patients who finished a long-term (6 months) occlusion (A1–A8). Although their visual acuity significantly improved, their degree of suppression, which was abnormal in all cases, did not change consistently. This was true in all durations of occlusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Reduced suppression from the fixing eye might not be result from occlusion therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6974542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69745422020-01-31 Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? Chen, Yiya He, Zhifen Mao, Yu Chen, Hao Zhou, Jiawei Hess, Robert F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: To determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month period of refractive adaptation, followed by occlusion therapy (i.e., patching their fellow eye with an opaque patch for 4 h/day). Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye and interocular suppression were measured before and after 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months of occlusion therapy. We quantified interocular suppression with a binocular phase combination task. RESULTS: Visual acuity (in logMAR) improved from 0.50 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD) to 0.33 ± 0.20 for patients who finished a short-term (2 months) occlusion (A1–A10), from 0.53 ± 0.20 to 0.32 ± 0.22 for patients who finished a medium-term (4 months) occlusion (A1–A9), and from 0.48 ± 0.19 to 0.22 ± 0.10 for patients who finished a long-term (6 months) occlusion (A1–A8). Although their visual acuity significantly improved, their degree of suppression, which was abnormal in all cases, did not change consistently. This was true in all durations of occlusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Reduced suppression from the fixing eye might not be result from occlusion therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6974542/ /pubmed/32009874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chen, He, Mao, Chen, Zhou and Hess. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Chen, Yiya
He, Zhifen
Mao, Yu
Chen, Hao
Zhou, Jiawei
Hess, Robert F.
Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
title Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
title_full Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
title_fullStr Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
title_full_unstemmed Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
title_short Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
title_sort patching and suppression in amblyopia: one mechanism or two?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyiya patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo
AT hezhifen patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo
AT maoyu patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo
AT chenhao patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo
AT zhoujiawei patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo
AT hessrobertf patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo