Cargando…
Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?
PURPOSE: To determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364 |
_version_ | 1783490118940622848 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yiya He, Zhifen Mao, Yu Chen, Hao Zhou, Jiawei Hess, Robert F. |
author_facet | Chen, Yiya He, Zhifen Mao, Yu Chen, Hao Zhou, Jiawei Hess, Robert F. |
author_sort | Chen, Yiya |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month period of refractive adaptation, followed by occlusion therapy (i.e., patching their fellow eye with an opaque patch for 4 h/day). Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye and interocular suppression were measured before and after 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months of occlusion therapy. We quantified interocular suppression with a binocular phase combination task. RESULTS: Visual acuity (in logMAR) improved from 0.50 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD) to 0.33 ± 0.20 for patients who finished a short-term (2 months) occlusion (A1–A10), from 0.53 ± 0.20 to 0.32 ± 0.22 for patients who finished a medium-term (4 months) occlusion (A1–A9), and from 0.48 ± 0.19 to 0.22 ± 0.10 for patients who finished a long-term (6 months) occlusion (A1–A8). Although their visual acuity significantly improved, their degree of suppression, which was abnormal in all cases, did not change consistently. This was true in all durations of occlusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Reduced suppression from the fixing eye might not be result from occlusion therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6974542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69745422020-01-31 Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? Chen, Yiya He, Zhifen Mao, Yu Chen, Hao Zhou, Jiawei Hess, Robert F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: To determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month period of refractive adaptation, followed by occlusion therapy (i.e., patching their fellow eye with an opaque patch for 4 h/day). Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye and interocular suppression were measured before and after 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months of occlusion therapy. We quantified interocular suppression with a binocular phase combination task. RESULTS: Visual acuity (in logMAR) improved from 0.50 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD) to 0.33 ± 0.20 for patients who finished a short-term (2 months) occlusion (A1–A10), from 0.53 ± 0.20 to 0.32 ± 0.22 for patients who finished a medium-term (4 months) occlusion (A1–A9), and from 0.48 ± 0.19 to 0.22 ± 0.10 for patients who finished a long-term (6 months) occlusion (A1–A8). Although their visual acuity significantly improved, their degree of suppression, which was abnormal in all cases, did not change consistently. This was true in all durations of occlusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Reduced suppression from the fixing eye might not be result from occlusion therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6974542/ /pubmed/32009874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chen, He, Mao, Chen, Zhou and Hess. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Chen, Yiya He, Zhifen Mao, Yu Chen, Hao Zhou, Jiawei Hess, Robert F. Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? |
title | Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? |
title_full | Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? |
title_fullStr | Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? |
title_full_unstemmed | Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? |
title_short | Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two? |
title_sort | patching and suppression in amblyopia: one mechanism or two? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyiya patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo AT hezhifen patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo AT maoyu patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo AT chenhao patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo AT zhoujiawei patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo AT hessrobertf patchingandsuppressioninamblyopiaonemechanismortwo |