Cargando…

Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database

Rare diseases, an emerging global public health priority, require an evidence-based estimate of the global point prevalence to inform public policy. We used the publicly available epidemiological data in the Orphanet database to calculate such a prevalence estimate. Overall, Orphanet contains inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguengang Wakap, Stéphanie, Lambert, Deborah M., Olry, Annie, Rodwell, Charlotte, Gueydan, Charlotte, Lanneau, Valérie, Murphy, Daniel, Le Cam, Yann, Rath, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0
_version_ 1783490134455353344
author Nguengang Wakap, Stéphanie
Lambert, Deborah M.
Olry, Annie
Rodwell, Charlotte
Gueydan, Charlotte
Lanneau, Valérie
Murphy, Daniel
Le Cam, Yann
Rath, Ana
author_facet Nguengang Wakap, Stéphanie
Lambert, Deborah M.
Olry, Annie
Rodwell, Charlotte
Gueydan, Charlotte
Lanneau, Valérie
Murphy, Daniel
Le Cam, Yann
Rath, Ana
author_sort Nguengang Wakap, Stéphanie
collection PubMed
description Rare diseases, an emerging global public health priority, require an evidence-based estimate of the global point prevalence to inform public policy. We used the publicly available epidemiological data in the Orphanet database to calculate such a prevalence estimate. Overall, Orphanet contains information on 6172 unique rare diseases; 71.9% of which are genetic and 69.9% which are exclusively pediatric onset. Global point prevalence was calculated using rare disease prevalence data for predefined geographic regions from the ‘Orphanet Epidemiological file’ (http://www.orphadata.org/cgi-bin/epidemio.html). Of the 5304 diseases defined by point prevalence, 84.5% of those analysed have a point prevalence of <1/1 000 000. However 77.3–80.7% of the population burden of rare diseases is attributable to the 4.2% (n = 149) diseases in the most common prevalence range (1–5 per 10 000). Consequently national definitions of ‘Rare Diseases’ (ranging from prevalence of 5 to 80 per 100 000) represent a variable number of rare disease patients despite sharing the majority of rare disease in their scope. Our analysis yields a conservative, evidence-based estimate for the population prevalence of rare diseases of 3.5–5.9%, which equates to 263–446 million persons affected globally at any point in time. This figure is derived from data from 67.6% of the prevalent rare diseases; using the European definition of 5 per 10 000; and excluding rare cancers, infectious diseases, and poisonings. Future registry research and the implementation of rare disease codification in healthcare systems will further refine the estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6974615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69746152020-01-22 Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database Nguengang Wakap, Stéphanie Lambert, Deborah M. Olry, Annie Rodwell, Charlotte Gueydan, Charlotte Lanneau, Valérie Murphy, Daniel Le Cam, Yann Rath, Ana Eur J Hum Genet Article Rare diseases, an emerging global public health priority, require an evidence-based estimate of the global point prevalence to inform public policy. We used the publicly available epidemiological data in the Orphanet database to calculate such a prevalence estimate. Overall, Orphanet contains information on 6172 unique rare diseases; 71.9% of which are genetic and 69.9% which are exclusively pediatric onset. Global point prevalence was calculated using rare disease prevalence data for predefined geographic regions from the ‘Orphanet Epidemiological file’ (http://www.orphadata.org/cgi-bin/epidemio.html). Of the 5304 diseases defined by point prevalence, 84.5% of those analysed have a point prevalence of <1/1 000 000. However 77.3–80.7% of the population burden of rare diseases is attributable to the 4.2% (n = 149) diseases in the most common prevalence range (1–5 per 10 000). Consequently national definitions of ‘Rare Diseases’ (ranging from prevalence of 5 to 80 per 100 000) represent a variable number of rare disease patients despite sharing the majority of rare disease in their scope. Our analysis yields a conservative, evidence-based estimate for the population prevalence of rare diseases of 3.5–5.9%, which equates to 263–446 million persons affected globally at any point in time. This figure is derived from data from 67.6% of the prevalent rare diseases; using the European definition of 5 per 10 000; and excluding rare cancers, infectious diseases, and poisonings. Future registry research and the implementation of rare disease codification in healthcare systems will further refine the estimates. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-16 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6974615/ /pubmed/31527858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Nguengang Wakap, Stéphanie
Lambert, Deborah M.
Olry, Annie
Rodwell, Charlotte
Gueydan, Charlotte
Lanneau, Valérie
Murphy, Daniel
Le Cam, Yann
Rath, Ana
Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
title Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
title_full Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
title_fullStr Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
title_full_unstemmed Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
title_short Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
title_sort estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the orphanet database
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0
work_keys_str_mv AT nguengangwakapstephanie estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT lambertdeborahm estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT olryannie estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT rodwellcharlotte estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT gueydancharlotte estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT lanneauvalerie estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT murphydaniel estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT lecamyann estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase
AT rathana estimatingcumulativepointprevalenceofrarediseasesanalysisoftheorphanetdatabase