Cargando…

Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review

Calibration, quantification, and standardization of the polarimetric instrumentation, as well as interpretation and understanding of the obtained data, require the development and use of well-calibrated phantoms and standards. We reviewed the status of tissue phantoms for a variety of applications i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chue-Sang, Joseph, Gonzalez, Mariacarla, Pierre, Angie, Laughrey, Megan, Saytashev, Ilyas, Novikova, Tatiana, Ramella-Roman, Jessica C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30851015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.030901
_version_ 1783490254268792832
author Chue-Sang, Joseph
Gonzalez, Mariacarla
Pierre, Angie
Laughrey, Megan
Saytashev, Ilyas
Novikova, Tatiana
Ramella-Roman, Jessica C.
author_facet Chue-Sang, Joseph
Gonzalez, Mariacarla
Pierre, Angie
Laughrey, Megan
Saytashev, Ilyas
Novikova, Tatiana
Ramella-Roman, Jessica C.
author_sort Chue-Sang, Joseph
collection PubMed
description Calibration, quantification, and standardization of the polarimetric instrumentation, as well as interpretation and understanding of the obtained data, require the development and use of well-calibrated phantoms and standards. We reviewed the status of tissue phantoms for a variety of applications in polarimetry; more than 500 papers are considered. We divided the phantoms into five groups according to their origin (biological/nonbiological) and fundamental polarimetric properties of retardation, depolarization, and diattenuation. We found that, while biological media are generally depolarizing, retarding, and diattenuating, only one of all the phantoms reviewed incorporated all these properties, and few considered at least combined retardation and depolarization. Samples derived from biological tissue, such as tendon and muscle, remain extremely popular to quickly ascertain a polarimetric system, but do not provide quantifiable results aside from relative direction of their principal optical axis. Microspheres suspensions are the most utilized phantoms for depolarization, and combined with theoretical models can offer true quantification of depolarization or degree of polarization. There is a real paucity of birefringent phantoms despite the retardance being one of the most interesting parameters measurable with polarization techniques. Therefore, future work should be directed at generating truly reliable and repeatable phantoms for this metric determination. Diattenuating phantoms are rare and application-specific. Given that diattenuation is considered to be low in most biological tissues, the lack of such phantoms is seen as less problematic. The heterogeneity of the phantoms reviewed points to a critical need for standardization in this field. Ultimately, all research groups involved in polarimetric studies and instruments development would benefit from sharing a limited set of standardized polarimetric phantoms, as is done earlier in the round robin investigations in ellipsometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6975228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69752282020-02-03 Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review Chue-Sang, Joseph Gonzalez, Mariacarla Pierre, Angie Laughrey, Megan Saytashev, Ilyas Novikova, Tatiana Ramella-Roman, Jessica C. J Biomed Opt Review Papers Calibration, quantification, and standardization of the polarimetric instrumentation, as well as interpretation and understanding of the obtained data, require the development and use of well-calibrated phantoms and standards. We reviewed the status of tissue phantoms for a variety of applications in polarimetry; more than 500 papers are considered. We divided the phantoms into five groups according to their origin (biological/nonbiological) and fundamental polarimetric properties of retardation, depolarization, and diattenuation. We found that, while biological media are generally depolarizing, retarding, and diattenuating, only one of all the phantoms reviewed incorporated all these properties, and few considered at least combined retardation and depolarization. Samples derived from biological tissue, such as tendon and muscle, remain extremely popular to quickly ascertain a polarimetric system, but do not provide quantifiable results aside from relative direction of their principal optical axis. Microspheres suspensions are the most utilized phantoms for depolarization, and combined with theoretical models can offer true quantification of depolarization or degree of polarization. There is a real paucity of birefringent phantoms despite the retardance being one of the most interesting parameters measurable with polarization techniques. Therefore, future work should be directed at generating truly reliable and repeatable phantoms for this metric determination. Diattenuating phantoms are rare and application-specific. Given that diattenuation is considered to be low in most biological tissues, the lack of such phantoms is seen as less problematic. The heterogeneity of the phantoms reviewed points to a critical need for standardization in this field. Ultimately, all research groups involved in polarimetric studies and instruments development would benefit from sharing a limited set of standardized polarimetric phantoms, as is done earlier in the round robin investigations in ellipsometry. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019-03-08 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6975228/ /pubmed/30851015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.030901 Text en © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Review Papers
Chue-Sang, Joseph
Gonzalez, Mariacarla
Pierre, Angie
Laughrey, Megan
Saytashev, Ilyas
Novikova, Tatiana
Ramella-Roman, Jessica C.
Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
title Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
title_full Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
title_fullStr Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
title_full_unstemmed Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
title_short Optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
title_sort optical phantoms for biomedical polarimetry: a review
topic Review Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30851015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.030901
work_keys_str_mv AT chuesangjoseph opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview
AT gonzalezmariacarla opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview
AT pierreangie opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview
AT laughreymegan opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview
AT saytashevilyas opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview
AT novikovatatiana opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview
AT ramellaromanjessicac opticalphantomsforbiomedicalpolarimetryareview