Cargando…

Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND. Postprogression repeat biopsies are critical in caring for patients with lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, hesitation about invasive procedures persists. We assessed safety and tissue adequacy for molecular profiling among repeat postprogression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fintelmann, Florian J., Troschel, Fabian M., Kuklinski, Martin W., McDermott, Shaunagh, Petranovic, Milena, Digumarthy, Subba R., Sharma, Amita, Troschel, Amelie S., Price, Melissa C., Hariri, Lida P., Gilman, Matthew D., Shepard, Joanne O., Sequist, Lecia V., Piotrowska, Zofia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0158
_version_ 1783490304610926592
author Fintelmann, Florian J.
Troschel, Fabian M.
Kuklinski, Martin W.
McDermott, Shaunagh
Petranovic, Milena
Digumarthy, Subba R.
Sharma, Amita
Troschel, Amelie S.
Price, Melissa C.
Hariri, Lida P.
Gilman, Matthew D.
Shepard, Joanne O.
Sequist, Lecia V.
Piotrowska, Zofia
author_facet Fintelmann, Florian J.
Troschel, Fabian M.
Kuklinski, Martin W.
McDermott, Shaunagh
Petranovic, Milena
Digumarthy, Subba R.
Sharma, Amita
Troschel, Amelie S.
Price, Melissa C.
Hariri, Lida P.
Gilman, Matthew D.
Shepard, Joanne O.
Sequist, Lecia V.
Piotrowska, Zofia
author_sort Fintelmann, Florian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Postprogression repeat biopsies are critical in caring for patients with lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, hesitation about invasive procedures persists. We assessed safety and tissue adequacy for molecular profiling among repeat postprogression percutaneous transthoracic needle aspirations and biopsies (rebiopsies). MATERIALS AND METHODS. All lung biopsies performed at our hospital from 2009 to 2017 were reviewed. Complications were classified by Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. Complication rates between rebiopsies in EGFR‐mutants and all other lung biopsies (controls) were compared using Fisher's exact test. Success of molecular profiling was recorded. RESULTS. During the study period, nine thoracic radiologists performed 107 rebiopsies in 75 EGFR‐mutant patients and 2,635 lung biopsies in 2,347 patients for other indications. All biopsies were performed with computed tomography guidance, coaxial technique, and rapid on‐site pathologic evaluation (ROSE). The default procedure was to take 22‐gauge fine‐needle aspirates (FNA) followed by 20‐gauge tissue cores. Minor complications occurred in 9 (8.4%) rebiopsies and 503 (19.1%; p = .004) controls, including pneumothoraces not requiring chest tube placement (4 [3.7%] vs. 426 [16.2%] in rebiopsies and controls, respectively; p < .001). The only major complication was pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement, occurring in zero rebiopsies and 38 (1.4%; p = .4) controls. Molecular profiling was requested in 96 (90%) rebiopsies and successful in 92/96 (96%). CONCLUSION. At our center, repeat lung biopsies for postprogression molecular profiling of EGFR‐mutant lung cancers result in fewer complications than typical lung biopsies. Coaxial technique, FNA, ROSE, and multiple 20‐gauge tissue cores result in excellent specimen adequacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Repeat percutaneous transthoracic needle aspirations and biopsies for postprogression molecular profiling of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant lung cancer are safe in everday clinical practice. Coaxial technique, fine‐needle aspirates, rapid on‐site pathologic evaluation, and multiple 20‐gauge tissue cores result in excellent specimen adequacy. Although liquid biopsies are increasingly used, their sensitivity for analysis of resistant EGFR‐mutant lung cancers remains limited. Tissue biopsies remain important in this context, especially because osimertinib is now in the frontline setting and T790M is no longer the major finding of interest on molecular profiling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6975961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69759612020-03-12 Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer Fintelmann, Florian J. Troschel, Fabian M. Kuklinski, Martin W. McDermott, Shaunagh Petranovic, Milena Digumarthy, Subba R. Sharma, Amita Troschel, Amelie S. Price, Melissa C. Hariri, Lida P. Gilman, Matthew D. Shepard, Joanne O. Sequist, Lecia V. Piotrowska, Zofia Oncologist Lung Cancer BACKGROUND. Postprogression repeat biopsies are critical in caring for patients with lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, hesitation about invasive procedures persists. We assessed safety and tissue adequacy for molecular profiling among repeat postprogression percutaneous transthoracic needle aspirations and biopsies (rebiopsies). MATERIALS AND METHODS. All lung biopsies performed at our hospital from 2009 to 2017 were reviewed. Complications were classified by Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. Complication rates between rebiopsies in EGFR‐mutants and all other lung biopsies (controls) were compared using Fisher's exact test. Success of molecular profiling was recorded. RESULTS. During the study period, nine thoracic radiologists performed 107 rebiopsies in 75 EGFR‐mutant patients and 2,635 lung biopsies in 2,347 patients for other indications. All biopsies were performed with computed tomography guidance, coaxial technique, and rapid on‐site pathologic evaluation (ROSE). The default procedure was to take 22‐gauge fine‐needle aspirates (FNA) followed by 20‐gauge tissue cores. Minor complications occurred in 9 (8.4%) rebiopsies and 503 (19.1%; p = .004) controls, including pneumothoraces not requiring chest tube placement (4 [3.7%] vs. 426 [16.2%] in rebiopsies and controls, respectively; p < .001). The only major complication was pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement, occurring in zero rebiopsies and 38 (1.4%; p = .4) controls. Molecular profiling was requested in 96 (90%) rebiopsies and successful in 92/96 (96%). CONCLUSION. At our center, repeat lung biopsies for postprogression molecular profiling of EGFR‐mutant lung cancers result in fewer complications than typical lung biopsies. Coaxial technique, FNA, ROSE, and multiple 20‐gauge tissue cores result in excellent specimen adequacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Repeat percutaneous transthoracic needle aspirations and biopsies for postprogression molecular profiling of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant lung cancer are safe in everday clinical practice. Coaxial technique, fine‐needle aspirates, rapid on‐site pathologic evaluation, and multiple 20‐gauge tissue cores result in excellent specimen adequacy. Although liquid biopsies are increasingly used, their sensitivity for analysis of resistant EGFR‐mutant lung cancers remains limited. Tissue biopsies remain important in this context, especially because osimertinib is now in the frontline setting and T790M is no longer the major finding of interest on molecular profiling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-31 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6975961/ /pubmed/31152082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0158 Text en © AlphaMed Press 2019
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Fintelmann, Florian J.
Troschel, Fabian M.
Kuklinski, Martin W.
McDermott, Shaunagh
Petranovic, Milena
Digumarthy, Subba R.
Sharma, Amita
Troschel, Amelie S.
Price, Melissa C.
Hariri, Lida P.
Gilman, Matthew D.
Shepard, Joanne O.
Sequist, Lecia V.
Piotrowska, Zofia
Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer
title Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer
title_full Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer
title_short Safety and Success of Repeat Lung Needle Biopsies in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor‐Mutant Lung Cancer
title_sort safety and success of repeat lung needle biopsies in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant lung cancer
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0158
work_keys_str_mv AT fintelmannflorianj safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT troschelfabianm safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT kuklinskimartinw safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT mcdermottshaunagh safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT petranovicmilena safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT digumarthysubbar safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT sharmaamita safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT troschelamelies safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT pricemelissac safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT haririlidap safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT gilmanmatthewd safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT shepardjoanneo safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT sequistleciav safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer
AT piotrowskazofia safetyandsuccessofrepeatlungneedlebiopsiesinpatientswithepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutantlungcancer