Cargando…
Was WHO SARS-related Travel Advisory for Toronto Ethical?
Freedom of movement is undoubtedly a fundamental international right. However, circumstances may arise where that right must be curtailed. Was the 2003 SARS outbreak in Toronto one such circumstance? Guénaël R.M. Rodier thinks WHO’s decision to impose a SARS-related travel advisory was justifiable,...
Autor principal: | Paquin, Leo J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17626386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03403714 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Canadians still stung by WHO's SARS travel advisory
por: Kondro, Wayne
Publicado: (2003) -
The ESCMID ethics advisory committee (EEAC): purpose and challenges
por: Righi, Elda, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Communication in the Toronto critical care community: important lessons learned during SARS
por: Booth, Christopher M, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
An Approach for Quantitatively Balancing Methylmercury Risk and Omega-3 Benefit in Fish Consumption Advisories
por: Stern, Alan H., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
World Committee on Tourism Ethics (WCTE) recommendation on COVID-19 certificates for international travel
por: Matsuura, Hiroaki
Publicado: (2021)