Cargando…
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Background and study aims Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9114 |
_version_ | 1783490318170062848 |
---|---|
author | Ba, Yongjiang Yue, Ping Leung, Joseph W. Wang, Haiping Lin, Yanyan Bai, Bing Zhu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Lei Zhu, Kexiang Wang, Wenhui Meng, Wenbo Zhou, Wence Liu, Ying Li, Xun |
author_facet | Ba, Yongjiang Yue, Ping Leung, Joseph W. Wang, Haiping Lin, Yanyan Bai, Bing Zhu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Lei Zhu, Kexiang Wang, Wenhui Meng, Wenbo Zhou, Wence Liu, Ying Li, Xun |
author_sort | Ba, Yongjiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and methods Between January 2011 and June 2017, a total of 180 patients with II, III, and IV HC were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. According to the drainage method, patients were divided into two groups: PTBD (n = 81) and ERCP (n = 99). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03104582, and was completed. Results Compared with the PTBD group, the ERCP group had a higher incidence of post-procedural cholangitis (37 [37.37 %] vs. 18 [22.22 %], P = 0.028) and pancreatitis (17 [17.17 %] vs. 2 [2.47 %], P = 0.001); required more salvaged biliary drainage (18 [18.18 %] vs. 5 [6.17 %], P = 0.029), and incurred a higher cost ( P < 0.05). Patients with type III and IV HC in the ERCP group had more cholangitis than those in the PTBD group (26 [36.62 %] vs. 11 [18.03 %], P = 0.018). The rate of cholangitis in patients who received endoscopic bilateral biliary stents insertion was higher than patients with unilateral stenting (23 [50.00 %] vs. 9 [26.47 %], P = 0.034), and underwent PTBD internal-external drainage had a higher incidence of cholangitis than those with only external drainage (11 [34.36 %] vs. 7 [14.29 %], P = 0.034). No significant difference in the rate of cholangitis was observed between the endoscopic unilateral stenting group and the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage group (9 [26.47 %] vs. 5 [26.32 %], P = 0.990). Conclusion Compared to ERCP, PTBD reduced the rate of cholangitis, pancreatitis, salvage biliary drainage, and decreased hospitalization costs in patients with types II, III, and IV HC. Risk of cholangitis for patients with types III and IV was significantly lower in the PTBD group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6976325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69763252020-02-01 Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma Ba, Yongjiang Yue, Ping Leung, Joseph W. Wang, Haiping Lin, Yanyan Bai, Bing Zhu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Lei Zhu, Kexiang Wang, Wenhui Meng, Wenbo Zhou, Wence Liu, Ying Li, Xun Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and methods Between January 2011 and June 2017, a total of 180 patients with II, III, and IV HC were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. According to the drainage method, patients were divided into two groups: PTBD (n = 81) and ERCP (n = 99). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03104582, and was completed. Results Compared with the PTBD group, the ERCP group had a higher incidence of post-procedural cholangitis (37 [37.37 %] vs. 18 [22.22 %], P = 0.028) and pancreatitis (17 [17.17 %] vs. 2 [2.47 %], P = 0.001); required more salvaged biliary drainage (18 [18.18 %] vs. 5 [6.17 %], P = 0.029), and incurred a higher cost ( P < 0.05). Patients with type III and IV HC in the ERCP group had more cholangitis than those in the PTBD group (26 [36.62 %] vs. 11 [18.03 %], P = 0.018). The rate of cholangitis in patients who received endoscopic bilateral biliary stents insertion was higher than patients with unilateral stenting (23 [50.00 %] vs. 9 [26.47 %], P = 0.034), and underwent PTBD internal-external drainage had a higher incidence of cholangitis than those with only external drainage (11 [34.36 %] vs. 7 [14.29 %], P = 0.034). No significant difference in the rate of cholangitis was observed between the endoscopic unilateral stenting group and the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage group (9 [26.47 %] vs. 5 [26.32 %], P = 0.990). Conclusion Compared to ERCP, PTBD reduced the rate of cholangitis, pancreatitis, salvage biliary drainage, and decreased hospitalization costs in patients with types II, III, and IV HC. Risk of cholangitis for patients with types III and IV was significantly lower in the PTBD group. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-02 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6976325/ /pubmed/32010755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9114 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Ba, Yongjiang Yue, Ping Leung, Joseph W. Wang, Haiping Lin, Yanyan Bai, Bing Zhu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Lei Zhu, Kexiang Wang, Wenhui Meng, Wenbo Zhou, Wence Liu, Ying Li, Xun Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title | Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full | Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short | Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort | percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bayongjiang percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT yueping percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT leungjosephw percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT wanghaiping percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT linyanyan percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT baibing percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT zhuxiaoliang percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT zhanglei percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT zhukexiang percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT wangwenhui percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT mengwenbo percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT zhouwence percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT liuying percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma AT lixun percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma |