Cargando…

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background and study aims  Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ba, Yongjiang, Yue, Ping, Leung, Joseph W., Wang, Haiping, Lin, Yanyan, Bai, Bing, Zhu, Xiaoliang, Zhang, Lei, Zhu, Kexiang, Wang, Wenhui, Meng, Wenbo, Zhou, Wence, Liu, Ying, Li, Xun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9114
_version_ 1783490318170062848
author Ba, Yongjiang
Yue, Ping
Leung, Joseph W.
Wang, Haiping
Lin, Yanyan
Bai, Bing
Zhu, Xiaoliang
Zhang, Lei
Zhu, Kexiang
Wang, Wenhui
Meng, Wenbo
Zhou, Wence
Liu, Ying
Li, Xun
author_facet Ba, Yongjiang
Yue, Ping
Leung, Joseph W.
Wang, Haiping
Lin, Yanyan
Bai, Bing
Zhu, Xiaoliang
Zhang, Lei
Zhu, Kexiang
Wang, Wenhui
Meng, Wenbo
Zhou, Wence
Liu, Ying
Li, Xun
author_sort Ba, Yongjiang
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and methods  Between January 2011 and June 2017, a total of 180 patients with II, III, and IV HC were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. According to the drainage method, patients were divided into two groups: PTBD (n = 81) and ERCP (n = 99). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03104582, and was completed. Results  Compared with the PTBD group, the ERCP group had a higher incidence of post-procedural cholangitis (37 [37.37 %] vs. 18 [22.22 %], P  = 0.028) and pancreatitis (17 [17.17 %] vs. 2 [2.47 %], P  = 0.001); required more salvaged biliary drainage (18 [18.18 %] vs. 5 [6.17 %], P  = 0.029), and incurred a higher cost ( P  < 0.05). Patients with type III and IV HC in the ERCP group had more cholangitis than those in the PTBD group (26 [36.62 %] vs. 11 [18.03 %], P  = 0.018). The rate of cholangitis in patients who received endoscopic bilateral biliary stents insertion was higher than patients with unilateral stenting (23 [50.00 %] vs. 9 [26.47 %], P  = 0.034), and underwent PTBD internal-external drainage had a higher incidence of cholangitis than those with only external drainage (11 [34.36 %] vs. 7 [14.29 %], P  = 0.034). No significant difference in the rate of cholangitis was observed between the endoscopic unilateral stenting group and the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage group (9 [26.47 %] vs. 5 [26.32 %], P  = 0.990). Conclusion  Compared to ERCP, PTBD reduced the rate of cholangitis, pancreatitis, salvage biliary drainage, and decreased hospitalization costs in patients with types II, III, and IV HC. Risk of cholangitis for patients with types III and IV was significantly lower in the PTBD group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6976325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69763252020-02-01 Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma Ba, Yongjiang Yue, Ping Leung, Joseph W. Wang, Haiping Lin, Yanyan Bai, Bing Zhu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Lei Zhu, Kexiang Wang, Wenhui Meng, Wenbo Zhou, Wence Liu, Ying Li, Xun Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and methods  Between January 2011 and June 2017, a total of 180 patients with II, III, and IV HC were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. According to the drainage method, patients were divided into two groups: PTBD (n = 81) and ERCP (n = 99). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03104582, and was completed. Results  Compared with the PTBD group, the ERCP group had a higher incidence of post-procedural cholangitis (37 [37.37 %] vs. 18 [22.22 %], P  = 0.028) and pancreatitis (17 [17.17 %] vs. 2 [2.47 %], P  = 0.001); required more salvaged biliary drainage (18 [18.18 %] vs. 5 [6.17 %], P  = 0.029), and incurred a higher cost ( P  < 0.05). Patients with type III and IV HC in the ERCP group had more cholangitis than those in the PTBD group (26 [36.62 %] vs. 11 [18.03 %], P  = 0.018). The rate of cholangitis in patients who received endoscopic bilateral biliary stents insertion was higher than patients with unilateral stenting (23 [50.00 %] vs. 9 [26.47 %], P  = 0.034), and underwent PTBD internal-external drainage had a higher incidence of cholangitis than those with only external drainage (11 [34.36 %] vs. 7 [14.29 %], P  = 0.034). No significant difference in the rate of cholangitis was observed between the endoscopic unilateral stenting group and the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage group (9 [26.47 %] vs. 5 [26.32 %], P  = 0.990). Conclusion  Compared to ERCP, PTBD reduced the rate of cholangitis, pancreatitis, salvage biliary drainage, and decreased hospitalization costs in patients with types II, III, and IV HC. Risk of cholangitis for patients with types III and IV was significantly lower in the PTBD group. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-02 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6976325/ /pubmed/32010755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9114 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ba, Yongjiang
Yue, Ping
Leung, Joseph W.
Wang, Haiping
Lin, Yanyan
Bai, Bing
Zhu, Xiaoliang
Zhang, Lei
Zhu, Kexiang
Wang, Wenhui
Meng, Wenbo
Zhou, Wence
Liu, Ying
Li, Xun
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9114
work_keys_str_mv AT bayongjiang percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT yueping percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT leungjosephw percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT wanghaiping percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT linyanyan percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT baibing percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhuxiaoliang percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhanglei percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhukexiang percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT wangwenhui percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT mengwenbo percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhouwence percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT liuying percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma
AT lixun percutaneoustranshepaticbiliarydrainagemaybethepreferredpreoperativedrainagemethodinhilarcholangiocarcinoma