Cargando…

Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy

Background and study aims  Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods  ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knoop, Richard F., Wedi, Edris, Petzold, Golo, Bremer, Sebastian C.B., Amanzada, Ahmad, Ellenrieder, Volker, Neesse, Albrecht, Kunsch, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8050
_version_ 1783490319797452800
author Knoop, Richard F.
Wedi, Edris
Petzold, Golo
Bremer, Sebastian C.B.
Amanzada, Ahmad
Ellenrieder, Volker
Neesse, Albrecht
Kunsch, Steffen
author_facet Knoop, Richard F.
Wedi, Edris
Petzold, Golo
Bremer, Sebastian C.B.
Amanzada, Ahmad
Ellenrieder, Volker
Neesse, Albrecht
Kunsch, Steffen
author_sort Knoop, Richard F.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods  The trial was prospectively conducted in an ex vivo animal model with porcine stomachs placed into the EASIE-R simulator. Prior to intervention, standardized lesions were set by coagulation dots, measuring 1, 2, 3 or 4 cm. Results  Overall, 152 procedures were performed. EMR and EMR+ were both very reliable in 1-cm lesions, each showing en bloc resection rates of 100 %. EMR+ en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in 2-cm lesions (95.44 % vs. 54.55 %, P  = 0.02), in 3-cm lesions (86.36 % vs. 18.18 %, P  < 0.01) and also in 4-cm lesions (60.00 % vs. 0 %, P  < 0.01). Perforations occurred only in EMR+ procedures in 4-cm lesions (3 of 20; 15 %). Conclusions  With its grasp-and-snare technique, EMR+ facilitates en bloc resection of larger lesions compared to conventional EMR. In lesions 2 cm and larger, EMR+ has demonstrated advantages, especially concerning en bloc resection rate. At 3 cm, EMR+ reaches its best discriminatory power whereas EMR+ has inherent limits at 4 cm and in lesions of that size, other techniques such as ESD or surgery should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6976338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69763382020-02-01 Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy Knoop, Richard F. Wedi, Edris Petzold, Golo Bremer, Sebastian C.B. Amanzada, Ahmad Ellenrieder, Volker Neesse, Albrecht Kunsch, Steffen Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods  The trial was prospectively conducted in an ex vivo animal model with porcine stomachs placed into the EASIE-R simulator. Prior to intervention, standardized lesions were set by coagulation dots, measuring 1, 2, 3 or 4 cm. Results  Overall, 152 procedures were performed. EMR and EMR+ were both very reliable in 1-cm lesions, each showing en bloc resection rates of 100 %. EMR+ en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in 2-cm lesions (95.44 % vs. 54.55 %, P  = 0.02), in 3-cm lesions (86.36 % vs. 18.18 %, P  < 0.01) and also in 4-cm lesions (60.00 % vs. 0 %, P  < 0.01). Perforations occurred only in EMR+ procedures in 4-cm lesions (3 of 20; 15 %). Conclusions  With its grasp-and-snare technique, EMR+ facilitates en bloc resection of larger lesions compared to conventional EMR. In lesions 2 cm and larger, EMR+ has demonstrated advantages, especially concerning en bloc resection rate. At 3 cm, EMR+ reaches its best discriminatory power whereas EMR+ has inherent limits at 4 cm and in lesions of that size, other techniques such as ESD or surgery should be considered. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-02 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6976338/ /pubmed/32010740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8050 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Knoop, Richard F.
Wedi, Edris
Petzold, Golo
Bremer, Sebastian C.B.
Amanzada, Ahmad
Ellenrieder, Volker
Neesse, Albrecht
Kunsch, Steffen
Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
title Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
title_full Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
title_fullStr Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
title_short Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
title_sort endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (emr+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8050
work_keys_str_mv AT knooprichardf endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT wediedris endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT petzoldgolo endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT bremersebastiancb endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT amanzadaahmad endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT ellenriedervolker endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT neessealbrecht endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy
AT kunschsteffen endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy