Cargando…
Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy
Background and study aims Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8050 |
_version_ | 1783490319797452800 |
---|---|
author | Knoop, Richard F. Wedi, Edris Petzold, Golo Bremer, Sebastian C.B. Amanzada, Ahmad Ellenrieder, Volker Neesse, Albrecht Kunsch, Steffen |
author_facet | Knoop, Richard F. Wedi, Edris Petzold, Golo Bremer, Sebastian C.B. Amanzada, Ahmad Ellenrieder, Volker Neesse, Albrecht Kunsch, Steffen |
author_sort | Knoop, Richard F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods The trial was prospectively conducted in an ex vivo animal model with porcine stomachs placed into the EASIE-R simulator. Prior to intervention, standardized lesions were set by coagulation dots, measuring 1, 2, 3 or 4 cm. Results Overall, 152 procedures were performed. EMR and EMR+ were both very reliable in 1-cm lesions, each showing en bloc resection rates of 100 %. EMR+ en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in 2-cm lesions (95.44 % vs. 54.55 %, P = 0.02), in 3-cm lesions (86.36 % vs. 18.18 %, P < 0.01) and also in 4-cm lesions (60.00 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.01). Perforations occurred only in EMR+ procedures in 4-cm lesions (3 of 20; 15 %). Conclusions With its grasp-and-snare technique, EMR+ facilitates en bloc resection of larger lesions compared to conventional EMR. In lesions 2 cm and larger, EMR+ has demonstrated advantages, especially concerning en bloc resection rate. At 3 cm, EMR+ reaches its best discriminatory power whereas EMR+ has inherent limits at 4 cm and in lesions of that size, other techniques such as ESD or surgery should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6976338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69763382020-02-01 Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy Knoop, Richard F. Wedi, Edris Petzold, Golo Bremer, Sebastian C.B. Amanzada, Ahmad Ellenrieder, Volker Neesse, Albrecht Kunsch, Steffen Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods The trial was prospectively conducted in an ex vivo animal model with porcine stomachs placed into the EASIE-R simulator. Prior to intervention, standardized lesions were set by coagulation dots, measuring 1, 2, 3 or 4 cm. Results Overall, 152 procedures were performed. EMR and EMR+ were both very reliable in 1-cm lesions, each showing en bloc resection rates of 100 %. EMR+ en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in 2-cm lesions (95.44 % vs. 54.55 %, P = 0.02), in 3-cm lesions (86.36 % vs. 18.18 %, P < 0.01) and also in 4-cm lesions (60.00 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.01). Perforations occurred only in EMR+ procedures in 4-cm lesions (3 of 20; 15 %). Conclusions With its grasp-and-snare technique, EMR+ facilitates en bloc resection of larger lesions compared to conventional EMR. In lesions 2 cm and larger, EMR+ has demonstrated advantages, especially concerning en bloc resection rate. At 3 cm, EMR+ reaches its best discriminatory power whereas EMR+ has inherent limits at 4 cm and in lesions of that size, other techniques such as ESD or surgery should be considered. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-02 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6976338/ /pubmed/32010740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8050 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Knoop, Richard F. Wedi, Edris Petzold, Golo Bremer, Sebastian C.B. Amanzada, Ahmad Ellenrieder, Volker Neesse, Albrecht Kunsch, Steffen Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
title | Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
title_full | Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
title_short | Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
title_sort | endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (emr+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knooprichardf endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT wediedris endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT petzoldgolo endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT bremersebastiancb endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT amanzadaahmad endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT ellenriedervolker endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT neessealbrecht endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy AT kunschsteffen endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanadditionalworkingchannelemrinaporcineexvivomodelanoveltechniquetoimproveenblocresectionrateofsnarepolypectomy |