Cargando…
Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment
Ecosystem carbon flux partitioning is strongly influenced by poorly constrained soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)). Simple model applications (Arrhenius and Q(10)) do not account for observed diel hysteresis between F(soil) and soil temperature. How this hysteresis emerges and how it will respond to variat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55390-6 |
_version_ | 1783490331370586112 |
---|---|
author | Dusza, Yann Sanchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Galliard, Jean-François Le Ferrière, Régis Chollet, Simon Massol, Florent Hansart, Amandine Juarez, Sabrina Dontsova, Katerina Haren, Joost van Troch, Peter Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell A. Hamerlynck, Erik Barron-Gafford, Greg A. |
author_facet | Dusza, Yann Sanchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Galliard, Jean-François Le Ferrière, Régis Chollet, Simon Massol, Florent Hansart, Amandine Juarez, Sabrina Dontsova, Katerina Haren, Joost van Troch, Peter Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell A. Hamerlynck, Erik Barron-Gafford, Greg A. |
author_sort | Dusza, Yann |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ecosystem carbon flux partitioning is strongly influenced by poorly constrained soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)). Simple model applications (Arrhenius and Q(10)) do not account for observed diel hysteresis between F(soil) and soil temperature. How this hysteresis emerges and how it will respond to variation in vegetation or soil moisture remains unknown. We used an ecosystem-level experimental system to independently control potential abiotic and biotic drivers of the F(soil)-T hysteresis. We hypothesized a principally biological cause for the hysteresis. Alternatively, F(soil) hysteresis is primarily driven by thermal convection through the soil profile. We conducted experiments under normal, fluctuating diurnal soil temperatures and under conditions where we held soil temperature near constant. We found (i) significant and nearly equal amplitudes of hysteresis regardless of soil temperature regime, and (ii) the amplitude of hysteresis was most closely tied to baseline rates of F(soil), which were mostly driven by photosynthetic rates. Together, these findings suggest a more biologically-driven mechanism associated with photosynthate transport in yielding the observed patterns of soil CO(2) efflux being out of sync with soil temperature. These findings should be considered on future partitioning models of ecosystem respiration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6976568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69765682020-01-29 Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment Dusza, Yann Sanchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Galliard, Jean-François Le Ferrière, Régis Chollet, Simon Massol, Florent Hansart, Amandine Juarez, Sabrina Dontsova, Katerina Haren, Joost van Troch, Peter Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell A. Hamerlynck, Erik Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Sci Rep Article Ecosystem carbon flux partitioning is strongly influenced by poorly constrained soil CO(2) efflux (F(soil)). Simple model applications (Arrhenius and Q(10)) do not account for observed diel hysteresis between F(soil) and soil temperature. How this hysteresis emerges and how it will respond to variation in vegetation or soil moisture remains unknown. We used an ecosystem-level experimental system to independently control potential abiotic and biotic drivers of the F(soil)-T hysteresis. We hypothesized a principally biological cause for the hysteresis. Alternatively, F(soil) hysteresis is primarily driven by thermal convection through the soil profile. We conducted experiments under normal, fluctuating diurnal soil temperatures and under conditions where we held soil temperature near constant. We found (i) significant and nearly equal amplitudes of hysteresis regardless of soil temperature regime, and (ii) the amplitude of hysteresis was most closely tied to baseline rates of F(soil), which were mostly driven by photosynthetic rates. Together, these findings suggest a more biologically-driven mechanism associated with photosynthate transport in yielding the observed patterns of soil CO(2) efflux being out of sync with soil temperature. These findings should be considered on future partitioning models of ecosystem respiration. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6976568/ /pubmed/31969580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55390-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Dusza, Yann Sanchez-Cañete, Enrique P. Galliard, Jean-François Le Ferrière, Régis Chollet, Simon Massol, Florent Hansart, Amandine Juarez, Sabrina Dontsova, Katerina Haren, Joost van Troch, Peter Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell A. Hamerlynck, Erik Barron-Gafford, Greg A. Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
title | Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
title_full | Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
title_fullStr | Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
title_short | Biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil CO(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
title_sort | biotic soil-plant interaction processes explain most of hysteric soil co(2) efflux response to temperature in cross-factorial mesocosm experiment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55390-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duszayann bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT sanchezcaneteenriquep bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT galliardjeanfrancoisle bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT ferriereregis bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT cholletsimon bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT massolflorent bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT hansartamandine bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT juarezsabrina bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT dontsovakaterina bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT harenjoostvan bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT trochpeter bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT pavaozuckermanmitchella bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT hamerlynckerik bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment AT barrongaffordgrega bioticsoilplantinteractionprocessesexplainmostofhystericsoilco2effluxresponsetotemperatureincrossfactorialmesocosmexperiment |