Cargando…

Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen

The objective was to compare the endometrial thickness (ET) in a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle between transdermal and vaginal estrogen. Our secondary objectives were to compare the patient satisfaction and the pregnancy outcomes. Prospective monocentric cohort study between 01/2017 and 12/2017...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corroenne, Romain, El Hachem, Hady, Verhaeghe, Caroline, Legendre, Guillaume, Dreux, Cecile, Jeanneteau, Pauline, Descamps, Philippe, May-Panloup, Pascale, Bouet, Pierre-Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57730-3
_version_ 1783490343047528448
author Corroenne, Romain
El Hachem, Hady
Verhaeghe, Caroline
Legendre, Guillaume
Dreux, Cecile
Jeanneteau, Pauline
Descamps, Philippe
May-Panloup, Pascale
Bouet, Pierre-Emmanuel
author_facet Corroenne, Romain
El Hachem, Hady
Verhaeghe, Caroline
Legendre, Guillaume
Dreux, Cecile
Jeanneteau, Pauline
Descamps, Philippe
May-Panloup, Pascale
Bouet, Pierre-Emmanuel
author_sort Corroenne, Romain
collection PubMed
description The objective was to compare the endometrial thickness (ET) in a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle between transdermal and vaginal estrogen. Our secondary objectives were to compare the patient satisfaction and the pregnancy outcomes. Prospective monocentric cohort study between 01/2017 and 12/2017 at a single institution. Choice of administration was left to the patient. 119 cycles had transdermal estrogen (T-group) and 199 had vaginal estrogen (V-group). The ET at 10 ± 1 days of treatment was significantly higher in the T-group compared to the V-group (9.9 vs 9.3 mm, p = 0.03). In the T-group, the mean duration of treatment was shorter (13.6 vs 15.5 days, p < 0.001). The rate of cycle cancelation was comparable between the two groups (12.6% vs 8.5%, p = 0.24). Serum estradiol levels were significantly lower (268 vs 1332 pg/ml, p < 0.001), and serum LH levels were significantly higher (12.1 ± 16.5 vs 5 ± 7.5 mIU/ml, p < 0.001) in the T-group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the T-group (p = 0.04) and 85.7% (36/42) of women who had received both treatments preferred the transdermal over the vaginal route. Live birth rates were comparable between the two groups (18% vs 19%, p = 0.1). Transdermal estrogen in artificial FET cycles was associated with higher ET, shorter treatment duration and better tolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6976623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69766232020-01-29 Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen Corroenne, Romain El Hachem, Hady Verhaeghe, Caroline Legendre, Guillaume Dreux, Cecile Jeanneteau, Pauline Descamps, Philippe May-Panloup, Pascale Bouet, Pierre-Emmanuel Sci Rep Article The objective was to compare the endometrial thickness (ET) in a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle between transdermal and vaginal estrogen. Our secondary objectives were to compare the patient satisfaction and the pregnancy outcomes. Prospective monocentric cohort study between 01/2017 and 12/2017 at a single institution. Choice of administration was left to the patient. 119 cycles had transdermal estrogen (T-group) and 199 had vaginal estrogen (V-group). The ET at 10 ± 1 days of treatment was significantly higher in the T-group compared to the V-group (9.9 vs 9.3 mm, p = 0.03). In the T-group, the mean duration of treatment was shorter (13.6 vs 15.5 days, p < 0.001). The rate of cycle cancelation was comparable between the two groups (12.6% vs 8.5%, p = 0.24). Serum estradiol levels were significantly lower (268 vs 1332 pg/ml, p < 0.001), and serum LH levels were significantly higher (12.1 ± 16.5 vs 5 ± 7.5 mIU/ml, p < 0.001) in the T-group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the T-group (p = 0.04) and 85.7% (36/42) of women who had received both treatments preferred the transdermal over the vaginal route. Live birth rates were comparable between the two groups (18% vs 19%, p = 0.1). Transdermal estrogen in artificial FET cycles was associated with higher ET, shorter treatment duration and better tolerance. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6976623/ /pubmed/31969591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57730-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Corroenne, Romain
El Hachem, Hady
Verhaeghe, Caroline
Legendre, Guillaume
Dreux, Cecile
Jeanneteau, Pauline
Descamps, Philippe
May-Panloup, Pascale
Bouet, Pierre-Emmanuel
Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
title Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
title_full Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
title_fullStr Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
title_short Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
title_sort endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: transdermal versus vaginal estrogen
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57730-3
work_keys_str_mv AT corroenneromain endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT elhachemhady endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT verhaeghecaroline endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT legendreguillaume endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT dreuxcecile endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT jeanneteaupauline endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT descampsphilippe endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT maypanlouppascale endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen
AT bouetpierreemmanuel endometrialpreparationforfrozenthawedembryotransferinanartificialcycletransdermalversusvaginalestrogen