Cargando…
Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnair...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz077 |
_version_ | 1783490368508002304 |
---|---|
author | Numasaki, Hodaka Teshima, Teruki Ando, Yutaka Akuta, Keizo Ikeda, Hiroshi Okajima, Kaoru Kumano, Tomoyasu Sasaki, Tomonari Sekiguchi, Kenji Tago, Masao Terahara, Atsuro Nakamura, Katsumasa Nishimura, Tetsuo Ogawa, Kazuhiko |
author_facet | Numasaki, Hodaka Teshima, Teruki Ando, Yutaka Akuta, Keizo Ikeda, Hiroshi Okajima, Kaoru Kumano, Tomoyasu Sasaki, Tomonari Sekiguchi, Kenji Tago, Masao Terahara, Atsuro Nakamura, Katsumasa Nishimura, Tetsuo Ogawa, Kazuhiko |
author_sort | Numasaki, Hodaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and (192)Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6976736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69767362020-01-27 Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 Numasaki, Hodaka Teshima, Teruki Ando, Yutaka Akuta, Keizo Ikeda, Hiroshi Okajima, Kaoru Kumano, Tomoyasu Sasaki, Tomonari Sekiguchi, Kenji Tago, Masao Terahara, Atsuro Nakamura, Katsumasa Nishimura, Tetsuo Ogawa, Kazuhiko J Radiat Res Technical Report This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and (192)Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012. Oxford University Press 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6976736/ /pubmed/31825076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz077 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Technical Report Numasaki, Hodaka Teshima, Teruki Ando, Yutaka Akuta, Keizo Ikeda, Hiroshi Okajima, Kaoru Kumano, Tomoyasu Sasaki, Tomonari Sekiguchi, Kenji Tago, Masao Terahara, Atsuro Nakamura, Katsumasa Nishimura, Tetsuo Ogawa, Kazuhiko Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
title | Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
title_full | Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
title_fullStr | Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
title_full_unstemmed | Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
title_short | Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
title_sort | japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 |
topic | Technical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT numasakihodaka japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT teshimateruki japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT andoyutaka japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT akutakeizo japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT ikedahiroshi japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT okajimakaoru japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT kumanotomoyasu japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT sasakitomonari japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT sekiguchikenji japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT tagomasao japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT teraharaatsuro japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT nakamurakatsumasa japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT nishimuratetsuo japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT ogawakazuhiko japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 AT japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012 |