Cargando…

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012

This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Numasaki, Hodaka, Teshima, Teruki, Ando, Yutaka, Akuta, Keizo, Ikeda, Hiroshi, Okajima, Kaoru, Kumano, Tomoyasu, Sasaki, Tomonari, Sekiguchi, Kenji, Tago, Masao, Terahara, Atsuro, Nakamura, Katsumasa, Nishimura, Tetsuo, Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz077
_version_ 1783490368508002304
author Numasaki, Hodaka
Teshima, Teruki
Ando, Yutaka
Akuta, Keizo
Ikeda, Hiroshi
Okajima, Kaoru
Kumano, Tomoyasu
Sasaki, Tomonari
Sekiguchi, Kenji
Tago, Masao
Terahara, Atsuro
Nakamura, Katsumasa
Nishimura, Tetsuo
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_facet Numasaki, Hodaka
Teshima, Teruki
Ando, Yutaka
Akuta, Keizo
Ikeda, Hiroshi
Okajima, Kaoru
Kumano, Tomoyasu
Sasaki, Tomonari
Sekiguchi, Kenji
Tago, Masao
Terahara, Atsuro
Nakamura, Katsumasa
Nishimura, Tetsuo
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_sort Numasaki, Hodaka
collection PubMed
description This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and (192)Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6976736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69767362020-01-27 Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012 Numasaki, Hodaka Teshima, Teruki Ando, Yutaka Akuta, Keizo Ikeda, Hiroshi Okajima, Kaoru Kumano, Tomoyasu Sasaki, Tomonari Sekiguchi, Kenji Tago, Masao Terahara, Atsuro Nakamura, Katsumasa Nishimura, Tetsuo Ogawa, Kazuhiko J Radiat Res Technical Report This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), (60)Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and (192)Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012. Oxford University Press 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6976736/ /pubmed/31825076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz077 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Technical Report
Numasaki, Hodaka
Teshima, Teruki
Ando, Yutaka
Akuta, Keizo
Ikeda, Hiroshi
Okajima, Kaoru
Kumano, Tomoyasu
Sasaki, Tomonari
Sekiguchi, Kenji
Tago, Masao
Terahara, Atsuro
Nakamura, Katsumasa
Nishimura, Tetsuo
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
title Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
title_full Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
title_fullStr Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
title_full_unstemmed Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
title_short Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
title_sort japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
topic Technical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz077
work_keys_str_mv AT numasakihodaka japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT teshimateruki japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT andoyutaka japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT akutakeizo japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT ikedahiroshi japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT okajimakaoru japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT kumanotomoyasu japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT sasakitomonari japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT sekiguchikenji japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT tagomasao japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT teraharaatsuro japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT nakamurakatsumasa japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT nishimuratetsuo japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT ogawakazuhiko japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012
AT japanesestructuresurveyofradiationoncologyin2012