Cargando…

Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review

Genital lymphedema (GL) is an uncommon and disabling disease that manifests as enlargement of the genital region resulting from the disturbance of lymphatic drainage. Although conservative treatment such as decompression is typically the first-line approach, surgical intervention has been shown to b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aulia, Indri, Yessica, Eva Chintia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964116
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01123
_version_ 1783490371133636608
author Aulia, Indri
Yessica, Eva Chintia
author_facet Aulia, Indri
Yessica, Eva Chintia
author_sort Aulia, Indri
collection PubMed
description Genital lymphedema (GL) is an uncommon and disabling disease that manifests as enlargement of the genital region resulting from the disturbance of lymphatic drainage. Although conservative treatment such as decompression is typically the first-line approach, surgical intervention has been shown to be effective in certain cases. This study aimed to systematically review studies evaluating available surgical alternatives for the treatment of male GL. A systematic search strategy using keyword and subject headings was applied to PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library in May 2019. Studies investigating various surgical techniques to treat penile and scrotal lymphedema were included. The potential risk of bias of included trials was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, nine of which were determined to be high-quality. The average MINORS score was 12.45 for studies involving excision and 14 for studies involving lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA). The most common reason for a low score was a failure to describe the inclusion criteria. Recurrence of lymphedema during follow-up was reported in four studies involving excision and in no studies involving LVA. In general, the quality of the included literature was considered to be fair. Although surgical intervention might not always prevent the recurrence of lymphedema, all of the studies reported improved quality of life after the procedure. This study could be used as the basis for evidence-based guidelines to be applied in clinical practice for managing male GL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6976747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69767472020-02-04 Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review Aulia, Indri Yessica, Eva Chintia Arch Plast Surg Review Article Genital lymphedema (GL) is an uncommon and disabling disease that manifests as enlargement of the genital region resulting from the disturbance of lymphatic drainage. Although conservative treatment such as decompression is typically the first-line approach, surgical intervention has been shown to be effective in certain cases. This study aimed to systematically review studies evaluating available surgical alternatives for the treatment of male GL. A systematic search strategy using keyword and subject headings was applied to PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library in May 2019. Studies investigating various surgical techniques to treat penile and scrotal lymphedema were included. The potential risk of bias of included trials was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, nine of which were determined to be high-quality. The average MINORS score was 12.45 for studies involving excision and 14 for studies involving lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA). The most common reason for a low score was a failure to describe the inclusion criteria. Recurrence of lymphedema during follow-up was reported in four studies involving excision and in no studies involving LVA. In general, the quality of the included literature was considered to be fair. Although surgical intervention might not always prevent the recurrence of lymphedema, all of the studies reported improved quality of life after the procedure. This study could be used as the basis for evidence-based guidelines to be applied in clinical practice for managing male GL. Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2020-01 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6976747/ /pubmed/31964116 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01123 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Aulia, Indri
Yessica, Eva Chintia
Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review
title Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review
title_full Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review
title_fullStr Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review
title_short Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review
title_sort surgical management of male genital lymphedema: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964116
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01123
work_keys_str_mv AT auliaindri surgicalmanagementofmalegenitallymphedemaasystematicreview
AT yessicaevachintia surgicalmanagementofmalegenitallymphedemaasystematicreview