Cargando…
Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans
BACKGROUND: Eyelids vary in morphology and structure depending on age, sex, and race. Usually, one-dimensional measurements are used to evaluate blepharoplasty outcomes. However, in recent years, three- or four- directional enlargements of the eyelid have been used for blepharoplasty in Asian patien...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964117 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01200 |
_version_ | 1783490373981569024 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ki Soo Ka, Soon Il Park, Dae Hwan |
author_facet | Park, Ki Soo Ka, Soon Il Park, Dae Hwan |
author_sort | Park, Ki Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Eyelids vary in morphology and structure depending on age, sex, and race. Usually, one-dimensional measurements are used to evaluate blepharoplasty outcomes. However, in recent years, three- or four- directional enlargements of the eyelid have been used for blepharoplasty in Asian patients, and the outcomes of techniques such as lateral canthoplasty or canthotomy and medial epicanthoplasty with increased scleral area cannot be analyzed using marginal reflex distance 1 or the area of corneal exposure. Therefore, we describe the use of a measurement method based on the eyeball exposure area (EEA). METHODS: To obtain normal EEA values by age and sex, 320 individuals were recruited. The participants were divided into eight age groups (n=40 in each group: female subjects, n=20; male subjects, n=20): 10–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years. The EEA value was obtained by dividing the exposed area by the total eyeball area. The normal EEA values and differences in EEA according to age and sex were calculated. RESULTS: The mean EEA values for male and female subjects were 66.86% ±9.20% and 71.48%±10.48%, respectively. In each age group, the EEA values of females were higher than those of males. EEA decreased significantly with age in both male and female subjects (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We determined normal EEA values according to age and sex. EEA can be used as an indicator of the outcome of blepharoplasty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6976759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69767592020-02-04 Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans Park, Ki Soo Ka, Soon Il Park, Dae Hwan Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Eyelids vary in morphology and structure depending on age, sex, and race. Usually, one-dimensional measurements are used to evaluate blepharoplasty outcomes. However, in recent years, three- or four- directional enlargements of the eyelid have been used for blepharoplasty in Asian patients, and the outcomes of techniques such as lateral canthoplasty or canthotomy and medial epicanthoplasty with increased scleral area cannot be analyzed using marginal reflex distance 1 or the area of corneal exposure. Therefore, we describe the use of a measurement method based on the eyeball exposure area (EEA). METHODS: To obtain normal EEA values by age and sex, 320 individuals were recruited. The participants were divided into eight age groups (n=40 in each group: female subjects, n=20; male subjects, n=20): 10–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years. The EEA value was obtained by dividing the exposed area by the total eyeball area. The normal EEA values and differences in EEA according to age and sex were calculated. RESULTS: The mean EEA values for male and female subjects were 66.86% ±9.20% and 71.48%±10.48%, respectively. In each age group, the EEA values of females were higher than those of males. EEA decreased significantly with age in both male and female subjects (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We determined normal EEA values according to age and sex. EEA can be used as an indicator of the outcome of blepharoplasty. Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2020-01 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6976759/ /pubmed/31964117 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01200 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Ki Soo Ka, Soon Il Park, Dae Hwan Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans |
title | Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans |
title_full | Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans |
title_fullStr | Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans |
title_full_unstemmed | Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans |
title_short | Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans |
title_sort | anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in koreans |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964117 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkkisoo anthropometricanalysisoftheeyeballexposureareainkoreans AT kasoonil anthropometricanalysisoftheeyeballexposureareainkoreans AT parkdaehwan anthropometricanalysisoftheeyeballexposureareainkoreans |