Cargando…

LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate

Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate analogue antimetabolite widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. A number of studies have shown that MTX delivered via nanoparticle carriers is more potent against cancer cells than free MTX, a phenomenon attributed to higher cellular uptake of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Natour, Mohammad Ahmad, Alazzo, Ali, Ghaemmaghami, Amir M., Kim, Dong-Hyun, Alexander, Cameron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6977166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100036
_version_ 1783490448780689408
author Al-Natour, Mohammad Ahmad
Alazzo, Ali
Ghaemmaghami, Amir M.
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Alexander, Cameron
author_facet Al-Natour, Mohammad Ahmad
Alazzo, Ali
Ghaemmaghami, Amir M.
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Alexander, Cameron
author_sort Al-Natour, Mohammad Ahmad
collection PubMed
description Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate analogue antimetabolite widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. A number of studies have shown that MTX delivered via nanoparticle carriers is more potent against cancer cells than free MTX, a phenomenon attributed to higher cellular uptake of the particles compared to the saturable folate receptor pathway. In this study, a cell-based global metabolic profiling approach was applied to study the effects of MTX in both free drug form and when encapsulated in -poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles on a cancer cell line, A549, and also on human-like THP-1 macrophages. The results showed that MTX loaded nanoparticles had less impact on the macrophages than free MTX, and the effects on macrophages were limited to changes in nucleotide metabolism and suppression of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, whereas free MTX also led to a drop in glycolytic activity and impairment in redox homeostasis. In contrast, MTX loaded nanoparticles showed a greater impact on A549 cells than the free drug, which was in accord with studies in other cell lines in prior literature with MTX-carrier nanoparticles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6977166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69771662020-01-28 LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate Al-Natour, Mohammad Ahmad Alazzo, Ali Ghaemmaghami, Amir M. Kim, Dong-Hyun Alexander, Cameron Int J Pharm X Special section on SFNano 2018 meeting: Nanomedicine - from particle design to applications; edited by Dr. Nathalie Mignet, Dr. Chantal Pichon and Dr. Marie-Pierre Rols Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate analogue antimetabolite widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. A number of studies have shown that MTX delivered via nanoparticle carriers is more potent against cancer cells than free MTX, a phenomenon attributed to higher cellular uptake of the particles compared to the saturable folate receptor pathway. In this study, a cell-based global metabolic profiling approach was applied to study the effects of MTX in both free drug form and when encapsulated in -poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles on a cancer cell line, A549, and also on human-like THP-1 macrophages. The results showed that MTX loaded nanoparticles had less impact on the macrophages than free MTX, and the effects on macrophages were limited to changes in nucleotide metabolism and suppression of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, whereas free MTX also led to a drop in glycolytic activity and impairment in redox homeostasis. In contrast, MTX loaded nanoparticles showed a greater impact on A549 cells than the free drug, which was in accord with studies in other cell lines in prior literature with MTX-carrier nanoparticles. Elsevier 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6977166/ /pubmed/31993584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100036 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Special section on SFNano 2018 meeting: Nanomedicine - from particle design to applications; edited by Dr. Nathalie Mignet, Dr. Chantal Pichon and Dr. Marie-Pierre Rols
Al-Natour, Mohammad Ahmad
Alazzo, Ali
Ghaemmaghami, Amir M.
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Alexander, Cameron
LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
title LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
title_full LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
title_fullStr LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
title_full_unstemmed LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
title_short LC-MS metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
title_sort lc-ms metabolomics comparisons of cancer cell and macrophage responses to methotrexate and polymer-encapsulated methotrexate
topic Special section on SFNano 2018 meeting: Nanomedicine - from particle design to applications; edited by Dr. Nathalie Mignet, Dr. Chantal Pichon and Dr. Marie-Pierre Rols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6977166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100036
work_keys_str_mv AT alnatourmohammadahmad lcmsmetabolomicscomparisonsofcancercellandmacrophageresponsestomethotrexateandpolymerencapsulatedmethotrexate
AT alazzoali lcmsmetabolomicscomparisonsofcancercellandmacrophageresponsestomethotrexateandpolymerencapsulatedmethotrexate
AT ghaemmaghamiamirm lcmsmetabolomicscomparisonsofcancercellandmacrophageresponsestomethotrexateandpolymerencapsulatedmethotrexate
AT kimdonghyun lcmsmetabolomicscomparisonsofcancercellandmacrophageresponsestomethotrexateandpolymerencapsulatedmethotrexate
AT alexandercameron lcmsmetabolomicscomparisonsofcancercellandmacrophageresponsestomethotrexateandpolymerencapsulatedmethotrexate