Cargando…

The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies

BACKGROUND: Ovine footrot caused by Dichelobacter nodosus (D nodosus) is an infectious disease affecting sheep worldwide. Switzerland plans a nationwide footrot eradication program, based on PCR-testing of interdigital swab samples. The aim of this study was to test for the presence of D nodosus in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraft, A. F., Strobel, H., Hilke, J., Steiner, A., Kuhnert, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6977287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-2243-8
_version_ 1783490475802492928
author Kraft, A. F.
Strobel, H.
Hilke, J.
Steiner, A.
Kuhnert, P.
author_facet Kraft, A. F.
Strobel, H.
Hilke, J.
Steiner, A.
Kuhnert, P.
author_sort Kraft, A. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ovine footrot caused by Dichelobacter nodosus (D nodosus) is an infectious disease affecting sheep worldwide. Switzerland plans a nationwide footrot eradication program, based on PCR-testing of interdigital swab samples. The aim of this study was to test for the presence of D nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks which had been subjected to different treatment strategies, to assess whether they were feasible for the eradication process, especially focussing on antimicrobial flock treatments. Clinical scoring and PCR-results were compared. Ten farms had used hoof bathing and hoof trimming without causing bleeding, ten had used individual treatments and flock vaccines to gain the free status and ten had become free through whole-flock systemic macrolide treatment. For every farm, three risk-based collected pool samples were analysed for the occurrence of virulent and benign D nodosus by PCR detection of aprV2/aprB2. RESULTS: Six flocks from any treatment group tested positive for aprB2 in all pools. Clinical signs were absent at the time of sampling, but some flocks had experienced non-progressive interdigital inflammation previously. Two flocks tested aprV2-positive in the high-risk pool. One of them underwent a progressive footrot outbreak shortly after sampling. Individual retesting indicated, that virulent D nodosus most likely was reintroduced by a recently purchased ram. In the second flock, a ram was tested positive and treated before clinical signs occurred. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment strategies eliminated the causative agent and were found to be suitable for implementation in the PCR-based eradication process. PCR-testing proved to be more sensitive than visual scoring, as it also detected clinically healthy carriers. It will be of benefit as a diagnostic tool in elimination and surveillance programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6977287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69772872020-01-28 The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies Kraft, A. F. Strobel, H. Hilke, J. Steiner, A. Kuhnert, P. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Ovine footrot caused by Dichelobacter nodosus (D nodosus) is an infectious disease affecting sheep worldwide. Switzerland plans a nationwide footrot eradication program, based on PCR-testing of interdigital swab samples. The aim of this study was to test for the presence of D nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks which had been subjected to different treatment strategies, to assess whether they were feasible for the eradication process, especially focussing on antimicrobial flock treatments. Clinical scoring and PCR-results were compared. Ten farms had used hoof bathing and hoof trimming without causing bleeding, ten had used individual treatments and flock vaccines to gain the free status and ten had become free through whole-flock systemic macrolide treatment. For every farm, three risk-based collected pool samples were analysed for the occurrence of virulent and benign D nodosus by PCR detection of aprV2/aprB2. RESULTS: Six flocks from any treatment group tested positive for aprB2 in all pools. Clinical signs were absent at the time of sampling, but some flocks had experienced non-progressive interdigital inflammation previously. Two flocks tested aprV2-positive in the high-risk pool. One of them underwent a progressive footrot outbreak shortly after sampling. Individual retesting indicated, that virulent D nodosus most likely was reintroduced by a recently purchased ram. In the second flock, a ram was tested positive and treated before clinical signs occurred. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment strategies eliminated the causative agent and were found to be suitable for implementation in the PCR-based eradication process. PCR-testing proved to be more sensitive than visual scoring, as it also detected clinically healthy carriers. It will be of benefit as a diagnostic tool in elimination and surveillance programs. BioMed Central 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6977287/ /pubmed/31969162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-2243-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kraft, A. F.
Strobel, H.
Hilke, J.
Steiner, A.
Kuhnert, P.
The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
title The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
title_full The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
title_fullStr The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
title_short The prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
title_sort prevalence of dichelobacter nodosus in clinically footrot-free sheep flocks: a comparative field study on elimination strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6977287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-2243-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kraftaf theprevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT strobelh theprevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT hilkej theprevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT steinera theprevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT kuhnertp theprevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT kraftaf prevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT strobelh prevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT hilkej prevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT steinera prevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies
AT kuhnertp prevalenceofdichelobacternodosusinclinicallyfootrotfreesheepflocksacomparativefieldstudyoneliminationstrategies