Cargando…
Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles
This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Questio...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30830593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1 |
_version_ | 1783490666114842624 |
---|---|
author | Keeling, Geoff |
author_facet | Keeling, Geoff |
author_sort | Keeling, Geoff |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Question Argument. In making clear where these arguments go wrong, a positive account is developed of how trolley cases can inform the ethics of automated vehicles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6978292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69782922020-02-03 Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles Keeling, Geoff Sci Eng Ethics Original Research/Scholarship This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Question Argument. In making clear where these arguments go wrong, a positive account is developed of how trolley cases can inform the ethics of automated vehicles. Springer Netherlands 2019-03-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6978292/ /pubmed/30830593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research/Scholarship Keeling, Geoff Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles |
title | Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles |
title_full | Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles |
title_fullStr | Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles |
title_short | Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles |
title_sort | why trolley problems matter for the ethics of automated vehicles |
topic | Original Research/Scholarship |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30830593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keelinggeoff whytrolleyproblemsmatterfortheethicsofautomatedvehicles |