Cargando…
Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health
Increasing modern contraceptive use and gender equity are major foci of the recently ratified Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 and the Government of India. Coercion and sabotage by husbands and in-laws to inhibit women's access, initiation, continuation, and successful use of modern contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100484 |
_version_ | 1783490713748504576 |
---|---|
author | Silverman, Jay G. Boyce, Sabrina C. Dehingia, Nabamallika Rao, Namratha Chandurkar, Dharmoo Nanda, Priya Hay, Katherine Atmavilas, Yamini Saggurti, Niranjan Raj, Anita |
author_facet | Silverman, Jay G. Boyce, Sabrina C. Dehingia, Nabamallika Rao, Namratha Chandurkar, Dharmoo Nanda, Priya Hay, Katherine Atmavilas, Yamini Saggurti, Niranjan Raj, Anita |
author_sort | Silverman, Jay G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing modern contraceptive use and gender equity are major foci of the recently ratified Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 and the Government of India. Coercion and sabotage by husbands and in-laws to inhibit women's access, initiation, continuation, and successful use of modern contraception methods (i.e., reproductive coercion) may contribute to low usage rates and unintended pregnancy in India; however, little is known about the extent of this problem. The current study assesses the prevalence of reproductive coercion, both husband and in-law perpetrated, among a large population-based sample. Data were collected from currently married women of reproductive age (15–49 years; N = 1770) across 49 districts of Uttar Pradesh as part of an evaluation of a broad effort to improve the public health system in the state. Dependent variables included modern contraceptive use in the past 12 months, unintended pregnancy, and pregnancy termination. Independent variables included ever experiencing reproductive coercion (RC) by a current husband or in-laws and lifetime experience of physical and sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) by a current husband. Approximately 1 in 8 (12%) women reported ever experiencing RC from their current husbands or in-laws; 42% of these women reported RC by husbands only, 48% reported RC by in-laws only, and 10% reported RC by both husbands and in-laws. Among women experiencing RC, more than one-third (36%) reported that their most recent pregnancy was unintended; these women had 4 to 5 times greater odds of unintended pregnancy and a more than 5 times decreased likelihood of recent use of modern contraceptives than women not experiencing RC, after accounting for effects of demographics and physical and sexual IPV. Scalable and sustainable interventions in both clinical and community settings are needed to reduce RC, a potentially key factor in effective strategies for improving women's reproductive autonomy and health in India and globally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6978494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69784942020-01-29 Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health Silverman, Jay G. Boyce, Sabrina C. Dehingia, Nabamallika Rao, Namratha Chandurkar, Dharmoo Nanda, Priya Hay, Katherine Atmavilas, Yamini Saggurti, Niranjan Raj, Anita SSM Popul Health Special Section: Gender Equality, Empowerment and Health (Guest editor: Anita Raj) Increasing modern contraceptive use and gender equity are major foci of the recently ratified Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 and the Government of India. Coercion and sabotage by husbands and in-laws to inhibit women's access, initiation, continuation, and successful use of modern contraception methods (i.e., reproductive coercion) may contribute to low usage rates and unintended pregnancy in India; however, little is known about the extent of this problem. The current study assesses the prevalence of reproductive coercion, both husband and in-law perpetrated, among a large population-based sample. Data were collected from currently married women of reproductive age (15–49 years; N = 1770) across 49 districts of Uttar Pradesh as part of an evaluation of a broad effort to improve the public health system in the state. Dependent variables included modern contraceptive use in the past 12 months, unintended pregnancy, and pregnancy termination. Independent variables included ever experiencing reproductive coercion (RC) by a current husband or in-laws and lifetime experience of physical and sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) by a current husband. Approximately 1 in 8 (12%) women reported ever experiencing RC from their current husbands or in-laws; 42% of these women reported RC by husbands only, 48% reported RC by in-laws only, and 10% reported RC by both husbands and in-laws. Among women experiencing RC, more than one-third (36%) reported that their most recent pregnancy was unintended; these women had 4 to 5 times greater odds of unintended pregnancy and a more than 5 times decreased likelihood of recent use of modern contraceptives than women not experiencing RC, after accounting for effects of demographics and physical and sexual IPV. Scalable and sustainable interventions in both clinical and community settings are needed to reduce RC, a potentially key factor in effective strategies for improving women's reproductive autonomy and health in India and globally. Elsevier 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6978494/ /pubmed/31998826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100484 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Special Section: Gender Equality, Empowerment and Health (Guest editor: Anita Raj) Silverman, Jay G. Boyce, Sabrina C. Dehingia, Nabamallika Rao, Namratha Chandurkar, Dharmoo Nanda, Priya Hay, Katherine Atmavilas, Yamini Saggurti, Niranjan Raj, Anita Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
title | Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
title_full | Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
title_fullStr | Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
title_short | Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: Prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
title_sort | reproductive coercion in uttar pradesh, india: prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health |
topic | Special Section: Gender Equality, Empowerment and Health (Guest editor: Anita Raj) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvermanjayg reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT boycesabrinac reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT dehingianabamallika reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT raonamratha reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT chandurkardharmoo reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT nandapriya reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT haykatherine reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT atmavilasyamini reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT saggurtiniranjan reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth AT rajanita reproductivecoercioninuttarpradeshindiaprevalenceandassociationswithpartnerviolenceandreproductivehealth |