Cargando…

Strategy and Decision Making in Karate

Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frigout, Jérôme, Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie, Delafontaine, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025
_version_ 1783490745246679040
author Frigout, Jérôme
Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie
Delafontaine, Arnaud
author_facet Frigout, Jérôme
Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie
Delafontaine, Arnaud
author_sort Frigout, Jérôme
collection PubMed
description Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and competition. The scoring of punches (43.7% of total scored points) and face kicks (37.9%) appears to be more significant (p ≤ 0.01) than that of body kicks (15.3%, p ≤ 0.01) and leg-sweeping (3.1%, p = 0.31). Penalties appear to be very significant and associated with victory when “scored” by the competitor against himself or herself (p ≤ 0.01). Competitors must score points and penalties. This zero-sum game induces a simple rivalry, whose purpose is domination and which must rely on a predefined strategy and initiative. Karatekas have to make decisions, such as when taking the risk to score points and penalties, whether or not they lead the score. Karatekas may decide to expose or protect themselves, create situations, or simply remain realistic and adhere to the plan. The question of decision making, which is central to this work, forces us to focus our future work on the notions of expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6978657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69786572020-02-01 Strategy and Decision Making in Karate Frigout, Jérôme Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie Delafontaine, Arnaud Front Psychol Psychology Karate will be included in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo as an additional sport. The inner logic of this activity includes a specific scoring system and way of modeling. Three hundred and nine bouts were observed in the competition context, which resulted in new perspectives on training and competition. The scoring of punches (43.7% of total scored points) and face kicks (37.9%) appears to be more significant (p ≤ 0.01) than that of body kicks (15.3%, p ≤ 0.01) and leg-sweeping (3.1%, p = 0.31). Penalties appear to be very significant and associated with victory when “scored” by the competitor against himself or herself (p ≤ 0.01). Competitors must score points and penalties. This zero-sum game induces a simple rivalry, whose purpose is domination and which must rely on a predefined strategy and initiative. Karatekas have to make decisions, such as when taking the risk to score points and penalties, whether or not they lead the score. Karatekas may decide to expose or protect themselves, create situations, or simply remain realistic and adhere to the plan. The question of decision making, which is central to this work, forces us to focus our future work on the notions of expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6978657/ /pubmed/32010034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025 Text en Copyright © 2020 Frigout, Tasseel-Ponche and Delafontaine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Frigout, Jérôme
Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie
Delafontaine, Arnaud
Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_full Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_fullStr Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_full_unstemmed Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_short Strategy and Decision Making in Karate
title_sort strategy and decision making in karate
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03025
work_keys_str_mv AT frigoutjerome strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
AT tasseelponchesophie strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate
AT delafontainearnaud strategyanddecisionmakinginkarate