Cargando…
Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
CONTEXT: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health‐care decision‐makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12997 |
_version_ | 1783490786712616960 |
---|---|
author | Addario, Bonnie Geissler, Jan Horn, Marcia K. Krebs, Linda U. Maskens, Deborah Oliver, Kathy Plate, Ananda Schwartz, Erin Willmarth, Nicole |
author_facet | Addario, Bonnie Geissler, Jan Horn, Marcia K. Krebs, Linda U. Maskens, Deborah Oliver, Kathy Plate, Ananda Schwartz, Erin Willmarth, Nicole |
author_sort | Addario, Bonnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health‐care decision‐makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual patient choice. Yet, the quality of many PROs in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal and requires improvement to add value to health care and policy decision making. OBJECTIVE: To show how the integration of the patient and/or patient advocate at all stages of PRO development can help to realize the full potential of PROs. METHODS: We examined the literature to show that the patient voice is often absent from the planning and implementation of PROs in cancer clinical trials. Good practice examples from the literature were combined with guideline recommendations, training or educational resources, and our own experience to create detailed practical steps for the inclusion of patients and/or patient advocates throughout PRO development. RESULTS: Patient or patient advocates can play an active role in shaping PROs that are meaningful to the patient. They can contribute to content, choice of medium and implementation in a way that may support PRO completion and minimize missing data. Patients and their advocates can work to ensure PRO findings are disseminated appropriately in a way that is accessible to patients. CONCLUSION: This practical guidance aims to optimize PRO development and implementation in clinical trials, resulting in robust, relevant data that reflect the patient experience and that support decisions made by all stakeholders involved in research and health care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6978854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69788542020-02-01 Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials Addario, Bonnie Geissler, Jan Horn, Marcia K. Krebs, Linda U. Maskens, Deborah Oliver, Kathy Plate, Ananda Schwartz, Erin Willmarth, Nicole Health Expect Review Articles CONTEXT: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health‐care decision‐makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual patient choice. Yet, the quality of many PROs in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal and requires improvement to add value to health care and policy decision making. OBJECTIVE: To show how the integration of the patient and/or patient advocate at all stages of PRO development can help to realize the full potential of PROs. METHODS: We examined the literature to show that the patient voice is often absent from the planning and implementation of PROs in cancer clinical trials. Good practice examples from the literature were combined with guideline recommendations, training or educational resources, and our own experience to create detailed practical steps for the inclusion of patients and/or patient advocates throughout PRO development. RESULTS: Patient or patient advocates can play an active role in shaping PROs that are meaningful to the patient. They can contribute to content, choice of medium and implementation in a way that may support PRO completion and minimize missing data. Patients and their advocates can work to ensure PRO findings are disseminated appropriately in a way that is accessible to patients. CONCLUSION: This practical guidance aims to optimize PRO development and implementation in clinical trials, resulting in robust, relevant data that reflect the patient experience and that support decisions made by all stakeholders involved in research and health care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-13 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6978854/ /pubmed/31722131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12997 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Addario, Bonnie Geissler, Jan Horn, Marcia K. Krebs, Linda U. Maskens, Deborah Oliver, Kathy Plate, Ananda Schwartz, Erin Willmarth, Nicole Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
title | Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
title_full | Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
title_short | Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
title_sort | including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT addariobonnie includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT geisslerjan includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT hornmarciak includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT krebslindau includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT maskensdeborah includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT oliverkathy includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT plateananda includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT schwartzerin includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials AT willmarthnicole includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials |