Cargando…

Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials

CONTEXT: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health‐care decision‐makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Addario, Bonnie, Geissler, Jan, Horn, Marcia K., Krebs, Linda U., Maskens, Deborah, Oliver, Kathy, Plate, Ananda, Schwartz, Erin, Willmarth, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12997
_version_ 1783490786712616960
author Addario, Bonnie
Geissler, Jan
Horn, Marcia K.
Krebs, Linda U.
Maskens, Deborah
Oliver, Kathy
Plate, Ananda
Schwartz, Erin
Willmarth, Nicole
author_facet Addario, Bonnie
Geissler, Jan
Horn, Marcia K.
Krebs, Linda U.
Maskens, Deborah
Oliver, Kathy
Plate, Ananda
Schwartz, Erin
Willmarth, Nicole
author_sort Addario, Bonnie
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health‐care decision‐makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual patient choice. Yet, the quality of many PROs in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal and requires improvement to add value to health care and policy decision making. OBJECTIVE: To show how the integration of the patient and/or patient advocate at all stages of PRO development can help to realize the full potential of PROs. METHODS: We examined the literature to show that the patient voice is often absent from the planning and implementation of PROs in cancer clinical trials. Good practice examples from the literature were combined with guideline recommendations, training or educational resources, and our own experience to create detailed practical steps for the inclusion of patients and/or patient advocates throughout PRO development. RESULTS: Patient or patient advocates can play an active role in shaping PROs that are meaningful to the patient. They can contribute to content, choice of medium and implementation in a way that may support PRO completion and minimize missing data. Patients and their advocates can work to ensure PRO findings are disseminated appropriately in a way that is accessible to patients. CONCLUSION: This practical guidance aims to optimize PRO development and implementation in clinical trials, resulting in robust, relevant data that reflect the patient experience and that support decisions made by all stakeholders involved in research and health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6978854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69788542020-02-01 Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials Addario, Bonnie Geissler, Jan Horn, Marcia K. Krebs, Linda U. Maskens, Deborah Oliver, Kathy Plate, Ananda Schwartz, Erin Willmarth, Nicole Health Expect Review Articles CONTEXT: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are used in parallel with clinical evidence to inform decisions made by industry, clinicians, regulators, health technology assessment bodies and other health‐care decision‐makers. In addition, PRO data can also guide shared decision making and individual patient choice. Yet, the quality of many PROs in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal and requires improvement to add value to health care and policy decision making. OBJECTIVE: To show how the integration of the patient and/or patient advocate at all stages of PRO development can help to realize the full potential of PROs. METHODS: We examined the literature to show that the patient voice is often absent from the planning and implementation of PROs in cancer clinical trials. Good practice examples from the literature were combined with guideline recommendations, training or educational resources, and our own experience to create detailed practical steps for the inclusion of patients and/or patient advocates throughout PRO development. RESULTS: Patient or patient advocates can play an active role in shaping PROs that are meaningful to the patient. They can contribute to content, choice of medium and implementation in a way that may support PRO completion and minimize missing data. Patients and their advocates can work to ensure PRO findings are disseminated appropriately in a way that is accessible to patients. CONCLUSION: This practical guidance aims to optimize PRO development and implementation in clinical trials, resulting in robust, relevant data that reflect the patient experience and that support decisions made by all stakeholders involved in research and health care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-13 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6978854/ /pubmed/31722131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12997 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Addario, Bonnie
Geissler, Jan
Horn, Marcia K.
Krebs, Linda U.
Maskens, Deborah
Oliver, Kathy
Plate, Ananda
Schwartz, Erin
Willmarth, Nicole
Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
title Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
title_full Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
title_fullStr Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
title_short Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
title_sort including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient‐reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12997
work_keys_str_mv AT addariobonnie includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT geisslerjan includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT hornmarciak includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT krebslindau includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT maskensdeborah includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT oliverkathy includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT plateananda includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT schwartzerin includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials
AT willmarthnicole includingthepatientvoiceinthedevelopmentandimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomesincancerclinicaltrials