Cargando…
“Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”?
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an umbrella term used to classify a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers based on the absence of an identifiable primary tumor. Clinically, CUPs are characterized by a set of distinct features comprising early metastatic dissemination in an atypical pattern, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01546 |
_version_ | 1783490795071864832 |
---|---|
author | Kolling, Stefan Ventre, Ferdinando Geuna, Elena Milan, Melissa Pisacane, Alberto Boccaccio, Carla Sapino, Anna Montemurro, Filippo |
author_facet | Kolling, Stefan Ventre, Ferdinando Geuna, Elena Milan, Melissa Pisacane, Alberto Boccaccio, Carla Sapino, Anna Montemurro, Filippo |
author_sort | Kolling, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an umbrella term used to classify a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers based on the absence of an identifiable primary tumor. Clinically, CUPs are characterized by a set of distinct features comprising early metastatic dissemination in an atypical pattern, an aggressive clinical course, poor response to empiric chemotherapy and, consequently, a short life expectancy. Two opposing strategies to change the dismal prognosis for the better are pursued. On the one hand, following the traditional tissue-gnostic approach, more and more sophisticated tissue-of-origin (TOO) classifier assays are employed to push identification of the putative primary to its limits with the clear intent of allowing tumor-site specific treatment. However, robust evidence supporting its routine clinical use is still lacking, notably with two recent randomized clinical trials failing to show a patient benefit of TOO-prediction based site-specific treatment over empiric chemotherapy in CUP. On the other hand, with regards to a tissue-agnostic strategy, precision medicine approaches targeting actionable genomic alterations have already transformed the treatment for many known tumor types. Yet, an unmet need remains for well-designed clinical trials to scrutinize its potential role in CUP beyond anecdotal case reports. In the absence of practice changing results, we believe that the emphasis on finding the presumed unknown primary tumor at all costs, implicit in the term CUP, has biased recent research in the field. Focusing on the distinct clinical features shared by all CUPs, we advocate adopting the term primary metastatic cancer (PMC) to denominate a distinct cancer entity instead. In our view, PMC should be considered the archetype of metastatic disease and as such, despite accounting for a mere 2–3% of malignancies, unraveling the mechanisms at play goes beyond improving the prognosis of patients with PMC and promises to greatly enhance our understanding of the metastatic process and carcinogenesis across all cancer types. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6978906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69789062020-02-01 “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? Kolling, Stefan Ventre, Ferdinando Geuna, Elena Milan, Melissa Pisacane, Alberto Boccaccio, Carla Sapino, Anna Montemurro, Filippo Front Oncol Oncology Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an umbrella term used to classify a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers based on the absence of an identifiable primary tumor. Clinically, CUPs are characterized by a set of distinct features comprising early metastatic dissemination in an atypical pattern, an aggressive clinical course, poor response to empiric chemotherapy and, consequently, a short life expectancy. Two opposing strategies to change the dismal prognosis for the better are pursued. On the one hand, following the traditional tissue-gnostic approach, more and more sophisticated tissue-of-origin (TOO) classifier assays are employed to push identification of the putative primary to its limits with the clear intent of allowing tumor-site specific treatment. However, robust evidence supporting its routine clinical use is still lacking, notably with two recent randomized clinical trials failing to show a patient benefit of TOO-prediction based site-specific treatment over empiric chemotherapy in CUP. On the other hand, with regards to a tissue-agnostic strategy, precision medicine approaches targeting actionable genomic alterations have already transformed the treatment for many known tumor types. Yet, an unmet need remains for well-designed clinical trials to scrutinize its potential role in CUP beyond anecdotal case reports. In the absence of practice changing results, we believe that the emphasis on finding the presumed unknown primary tumor at all costs, implicit in the term CUP, has biased recent research in the field. Focusing on the distinct clinical features shared by all CUPs, we advocate adopting the term primary metastatic cancer (PMC) to denominate a distinct cancer entity instead. In our view, PMC should be considered the archetype of metastatic disease and as such, despite accounting for a mere 2–3% of malignancies, unraveling the mechanisms at play goes beyond improving the prognosis of patients with PMC and promises to greatly enhance our understanding of the metastatic process and carcinogenesis across all cancer types. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6978906/ /pubmed/32010631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01546 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kolling, Ventre, Geuna, Milan, Pisacane, Boccaccio, Sapino and Montemurro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Kolling, Stefan Ventre, Ferdinando Geuna, Elena Milan, Melissa Pisacane, Alberto Boccaccio, Carla Sapino, Anna Montemurro, Filippo “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? |
title | “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? |
title_full | “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? |
title_fullStr | “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? |
title_full_unstemmed | “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? |
title_short | “Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary” or “Primary Metastatic Cancer”? |
title_sort | “metastatic cancer of unknown primary” or “primary metastatic cancer”? |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6978906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kollingstefan metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT ventreferdinando metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT geunaelena metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT milanmelissa metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT pisacanealberto metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT boccacciocarla metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT sapinoanna metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer AT montemurrofilippo metastaticcancerofunknownprimaryorprimarymetastaticcancer |