Cargando…

Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation

INTRODUCTION: Organ volumes at postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) should reflect autopsy organ weights, and thus brain: liver volume ratios on imaging could be a surrogate for weight volume ratios at autopsy to indicate fetal growth restriction (FGR). This study aims to determine whether i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shelmerdine, Susan C., Chung, Kimberly L., Hutchinson, John C., Elliott, Claire, Sebire, Neil J., Arthurs, Owen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000497158
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Organ volumes at postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) should reflect autopsy organ weights, and thus brain: liver volume ratios on imaging could be a surrogate for weight volume ratios at autopsy to indicate fetal growth restriction (FGR). This study aims to determine whether imaging-based organ volume ratios can replace autopsy organ weight ratios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An unselected cohort of perinatal deaths underwent PMMR prior to autopsy. Semiautomated brain and liver volumes were compared to autopsy organ weights and ratios. Ratios were compared using Bland-Altman plots, and intra- and interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: A total 49 fetuses (25 male, 51%) at 17–42 weeks gestation were ­assessed. There was a reasonable correlation between autopsy-derived brain: liver weight ratios (AB: LwR) and imaging-derived brain: liver volume ratios (IB: LvR; r = 0.8). The mean difference between AB: LwR and IB: LvR was +0.7 (95% limits of agreement range −1.5 to +2.9). In a small subset where FGR was present, the optimal IB: LvR ≥5.5 gave 83.3% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity for diagnosis. There was acceptable agreement within readers (mean difference in IB: LvRs 0.77 ± 2.21) and between readers −0.36 ± 0.68. CONCLUSION: IB: LvR provides a surrogate evaluation of AB: LwRs, and may be used as a marker of FGR where autopsy is declined.