Cargando…

Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation

INTRODUCTION: Organ volumes at postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) should reflect autopsy organ weights, and thus brain: liver volume ratios on imaging could be a surrogate for weight volume ratios at autopsy to indicate fetal growth restriction (FGR). This study aims to determine whether i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shelmerdine, Susan C., Chung, Kimberly L., Hutchinson, John C., Elliott, Claire, Sebire, Neil J., Arthurs, Owen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000497158
_version_ 1783490896728162304
author Shelmerdine, Susan C.
Chung, Kimberly L.
Hutchinson, John C.
Elliott, Claire
Sebire, Neil J.
Arthurs, Owen J.
author_facet Shelmerdine, Susan C.
Chung, Kimberly L.
Hutchinson, John C.
Elliott, Claire
Sebire, Neil J.
Arthurs, Owen J.
author_sort Shelmerdine, Susan C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Organ volumes at postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) should reflect autopsy organ weights, and thus brain: liver volume ratios on imaging could be a surrogate for weight volume ratios at autopsy to indicate fetal growth restriction (FGR). This study aims to determine whether imaging-based organ volume ratios can replace autopsy organ weight ratios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An unselected cohort of perinatal deaths underwent PMMR prior to autopsy. Semiautomated brain and liver volumes were compared to autopsy organ weights and ratios. Ratios were compared using Bland-Altman plots, and intra- and interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: A total 49 fetuses (25 male, 51%) at 17–42 weeks gestation were ­assessed. There was a reasonable correlation between autopsy-derived brain: liver weight ratios (AB: LwR) and imaging-derived brain: liver volume ratios (IB: LvR; r = 0.8). The mean difference between AB: LwR and IB: LvR was +0.7 (95% limits of agreement range −1.5 to +2.9). In a small subset where FGR was present, the optimal IB: LvR ≥5.5 gave 83.3% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity for diagnosis. There was acceptable agreement within readers (mean difference in IB: LvRs 0.77 ± 2.21) and between readers −0.36 ± 0.68. CONCLUSION: IB: LvR provides a surrogate evaluation of AB: LwRs, and may be used as a marker of FGR where autopsy is declined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6979430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69794302020-01-27 Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation Shelmerdine, Susan C. Chung, Kimberly L. Hutchinson, John C. Elliott, Claire Sebire, Neil J. Arthurs, Owen J. Fetal Diagn Ther Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Organ volumes at postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) should reflect autopsy organ weights, and thus brain: liver volume ratios on imaging could be a surrogate for weight volume ratios at autopsy to indicate fetal growth restriction (FGR). This study aims to determine whether imaging-based organ volume ratios can replace autopsy organ weight ratios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An unselected cohort of perinatal deaths underwent PMMR prior to autopsy. Semiautomated brain and liver volumes were compared to autopsy organ weights and ratios. Ratios were compared using Bland-Altman plots, and intra- and interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: A total 49 fetuses (25 male, 51%) at 17–42 weeks gestation were ­assessed. There was a reasonable correlation between autopsy-derived brain: liver weight ratios (AB: LwR) and imaging-derived brain: liver volume ratios (IB: LvR; r = 0.8). The mean difference between AB: LwR and IB: LvR was +0.7 (95% limits of agreement range −1.5 to +2.9). In a small subset where FGR was present, the optimal IB: LvR ≥5.5 gave 83.3% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity for diagnosis. There was acceptable agreement within readers (mean difference in IB: LvRs 0.77 ± 2.21) and between readers −0.36 ± 0.68. CONCLUSION: IB: LvR provides a surrogate evaluation of AB: LwRs, and may be used as a marker of FGR where autopsy is declined. S. Karger AG 2019-12 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6979430/ /pubmed/30970374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000497158 Text en Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Shelmerdine, Susan C.
Chung, Kimberly L.
Hutchinson, John C.
Elliott, Claire
Sebire, Neil J.
Arthurs, Owen J.
Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation
title Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation
title_full Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation
title_fullStr Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation
title_short Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation
title_sort feasibility of postmortem imaging assessment of brain: liver volume ratios with pathological validation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000497158
work_keys_str_mv AT shelmerdinesusanc feasibilityofpostmortemimagingassessmentofbrainlivervolumeratioswithpathologicalvalidation
AT chungkimberlyl feasibilityofpostmortemimagingassessmentofbrainlivervolumeratioswithpathologicalvalidation
AT hutchinsonjohnc feasibilityofpostmortemimagingassessmentofbrainlivervolumeratioswithpathologicalvalidation
AT elliottclaire feasibilityofpostmortemimagingassessmentofbrainlivervolumeratioswithpathologicalvalidation
AT sebireneilj feasibilityofpostmortemimagingassessmentofbrainlivervolumeratioswithpathologicalvalidation
AT arthursowenj feasibilityofpostmortemimagingassessmentofbrainlivervolumeratioswithpathologicalvalidation