Cargando…

Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications

Dyspnea is the most common symptom experienced by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To avoid exertional dyspnea, many patients adopt a sedentary lifestyle which predictably leads to extensive skeletal muscle deconditioning, social isolation, and its negative psychological s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, Denis E., Milne, Kathryn M., James, Matthew D., de Torres, Juan Pablo, Neder, J. Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01128-9
_version_ 1783490901787541504
author O’Donnell, Denis E.
Milne, Kathryn M.
James, Matthew D.
de Torres, Juan Pablo
Neder, J. Alberto
author_facet O’Donnell, Denis E.
Milne, Kathryn M.
James, Matthew D.
de Torres, Juan Pablo
Neder, J. Alberto
author_sort O’Donnell, Denis E.
collection PubMed
description Dyspnea is the most common symptom experienced by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To avoid exertional dyspnea, many patients adopt a sedentary lifestyle which predictably leads to extensive skeletal muscle deconditioning, social isolation, and its negative psychological sequalae. This “dyspnea spiral” is well documented and it is no surprise that alleviation of this distressing symptom has become a key objective highlighted across COPD guidelines. In reality, this important goal is often difficult to achieve, and successful symptom management awaits a clearer understanding of the underlying mechanisms of dyspnea and how these can be therapeutically manipulated for the patients’ benefit. Current theoretical constructs of the origins of activity-related dyspnea generally endorse the classical demand–capacity imbalance theory. Thus, it is believed that disruption of the normally harmonious relationship between inspiratory neural drive (IND) to breathe and the simultaneous dynamic response of the respiratory system fundamentally shapes the expression of respiratory discomfort in COPD. Sadly, the symptom of dyspnea cannot be eliminated in patients with advanced COPD with relatively fixed pathophysiological impairment. However, there is evidence that effective symptom palliation is possible for many. Interventions that reduce IND, without compromising alveolar ventilation (V(A)), or that improve respiratory mechanics and muscle function, or that address the affective dimension, achieve measurable benefits. A common final pathway of dyspnea relief and improved exercise tolerance across the range of therapeutic interventions (bronchodilators, exercise training, ambulatory oxygen, inspiratory muscle training, and opiate medications) is reduced neuromechanical dissociation of the respiratory system. These interventions, singly and in combination, partially restore more harmonious matching of excessive IND to ventilatory output achieved. In this review we propose, on the basis of a thorough review of the recent literature, that effective dyspnea amelioration requires combined interventions and a structured multidisciplinary approach, carefully tailored to meet the specific needs of the individual.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6979461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69794612020-02-03 Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications O’Donnell, Denis E. Milne, Kathryn M. James, Matthew D. de Torres, Juan Pablo Neder, J. Alberto Adv Ther Review Dyspnea is the most common symptom experienced by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To avoid exertional dyspnea, many patients adopt a sedentary lifestyle which predictably leads to extensive skeletal muscle deconditioning, social isolation, and its negative psychological sequalae. This “dyspnea spiral” is well documented and it is no surprise that alleviation of this distressing symptom has become a key objective highlighted across COPD guidelines. In reality, this important goal is often difficult to achieve, and successful symptom management awaits a clearer understanding of the underlying mechanisms of dyspnea and how these can be therapeutically manipulated for the patients’ benefit. Current theoretical constructs of the origins of activity-related dyspnea generally endorse the classical demand–capacity imbalance theory. Thus, it is believed that disruption of the normally harmonious relationship between inspiratory neural drive (IND) to breathe and the simultaneous dynamic response of the respiratory system fundamentally shapes the expression of respiratory discomfort in COPD. Sadly, the symptom of dyspnea cannot be eliminated in patients with advanced COPD with relatively fixed pathophysiological impairment. However, there is evidence that effective symptom palliation is possible for many. Interventions that reduce IND, without compromising alveolar ventilation (V(A)), or that improve respiratory mechanics and muscle function, or that address the affective dimension, achieve measurable benefits. A common final pathway of dyspnea relief and improved exercise tolerance across the range of therapeutic interventions (bronchodilators, exercise training, ambulatory oxygen, inspiratory muscle training, and opiate medications) is reduced neuromechanical dissociation of the respiratory system. These interventions, singly and in combination, partially restore more harmonious matching of excessive IND to ventilatory output achieved. In this review we propose, on the basis of a thorough review of the recent literature, that effective dyspnea amelioration requires combined interventions and a structured multidisciplinary approach, carefully tailored to meet the specific needs of the individual. Springer Healthcare 2019-10-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6979461/ /pubmed/31673990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01128-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
O’Donnell, Denis E.
Milne, Kathryn M.
James, Matthew D.
de Torres, Juan Pablo
Neder, J. Alberto
Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications
title Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications
title_full Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications
title_fullStr Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications
title_full_unstemmed Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications
title_short Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications
title_sort dyspnea in copd: new mechanistic insights and management implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01128-9
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnelldenise dyspneaincopdnewmechanisticinsightsandmanagementimplications
AT milnekathrynm dyspneaincopdnewmechanisticinsightsandmanagementimplications
AT jamesmatthewd dyspneaincopdnewmechanisticinsightsandmanagementimplications
AT detorresjuanpablo dyspneaincopdnewmechanisticinsightsandmanagementimplications
AT nederjalberto dyspneaincopdnewmechanisticinsightsandmanagementimplications