Cargando…

Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?

OBJECTIVES: Decades of empirical research demonstrate that crime is concentrated at a range of spatial scales, including street segments. Further, the degree of clustering at particular geographic units remains noticeably stable and consistent; a finding that Weisburd (Criminology 53:133–157, 2015)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosser, Gabriel, Davies, Toby, Bowers, Kate J., Johnson, Shane D., Cheng, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9321-x
_version_ 1783490912740966400
author Rosser, Gabriel
Davies, Toby
Bowers, Kate J.
Johnson, Shane D.
Cheng, Tao
author_facet Rosser, Gabriel
Davies, Toby
Bowers, Kate J.
Johnson, Shane D.
Cheng, Tao
author_sort Rosser, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Decades of empirical research demonstrate that crime is concentrated at a range of spatial scales, including street segments. Further, the degree of clustering at particular geographic units remains noticeably stable and consistent; a finding that Weisburd (Criminology 53:133–157, 2015) has recently termed the ‘law of crime concentration at places’. Such findings suggest that the future locations of crime should—to some extent at least—be predictable. To date, methods of forecasting where crime is most likely to next occur have focused either on area-level or grid-based predictions. No studies of which we are aware have developed and tested the accuracy of methods for predicting the future risk of crime at the street segment level. This is surprising given that it is at this level of place that many crimes are committed and policing resources are deployed. METHODS: Using data for property crimes for a large UK metropolitan police force area, we introduce and calibrate a network-based version of prospective crime mapping [e.g. Bowers et al. (Br J Criminol 44:641–658, 2004)], and compare its performance against grid-based alternatives. We also examine how measures of predictive accuracy can be translated to the network context, and show how differences in performance between the two cases can be quantified and tested. RESULTS: Findings demonstrate that the calibrated network-based model substantially outperforms a grid-based alternative in terms of predictive accuracy, with, for example, approximately 20 % more crime identified at a coverage level of 5 %. The improvement in accuracy is highly statistically significant at all coverage levels tested (from 1 to 10 %). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, for property crime at least, network-based methods of crime forecasting are likely to outperform grid-based alternatives, and hence should be used in operational policing. More sophisticated variations of the model tested are possible and should be developed and tested in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6979510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69795102020-02-03 Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks? Rosser, Gabriel Davies, Toby Bowers, Kate J. Johnson, Shane D. Cheng, Tao J Quant Criminol Original Paper OBJECTIVES: Decades of empirical research demonstrate that crime is concentrated at a range of spatial scales, including street segments. Further, the degree of clustering at particular geographic units remains noticeably stable and consistent; a finding that Weisburd (Criminology 53:133–157, 2015) has recently termed the ‘law of crime concentration at places’. Such findings suggest that the future locations of crime should—to some extent at least—be predictable. To date, methods of forecasting where crime is most likely to next occur have focused either on area-level or grid-based predictions. No studies of which we are aware have developed and tested the accuracy of methods for predicting the future risk of crime at the street segment level. This is surprising given that it is at this level of place that many crimes are committed and policing resources are deployed. METHODS: Using data for property crimes for a large UK metropolitan police force area, we introduce and calibrate a network-based version of prospective crime mapping [e.g. Bowers et al. (Br J Criminol 44:641–658, 2004)], and compare its performance against grid-based alternatives. We also examine how measures of predictive accuracy can be translated to the network context, and show how differences in performance between the two cases can be quantified and tested. RESULTS: Findings demonstrate that the calibrated network-based model substantially outperforms a grid-based alternative in terms of predictive accuracy, with, for example, approximately 20 % more crime identified at a coverage level of 5 %. The improvement in accuracy is highly statistically significant at all coverage levels tested (from 1 to 10 %). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, for property crime at least, network-based methods of crime forecasting are likely to outperform grid-based alternatives, and hence should be used in operational policing. More sophisticated variations of the model tested are possible and should be developed and tested in future research. Springer US 2016-09-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6979510/ /pubmed/32025086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9321-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rosser, Gabriel
Davies, Toby
Bowers, Kate J.
Johnson, Shane D.
Cheng, Tao
Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?
title Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?
title_full Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?
title_fullStr Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?
title_short Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks?
title_sort predictive crime mapping: arbitrary grids or street networks?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9321-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rossergabriel predictivecrimemappingarbitrarygridsorstreetnetworks
AT daviestoby predictivecrimemappingarbitrarygridsorstreetnetworks
AT bowerskatej predictivecrimemappingarbitrarygridsorstreetnetworks
AT johnsonshaned predictivecrimemappingarbitrarygridsorstreetnetworks
AT chengtao predictivecrimemappingarbitrarygridsorstreetnetworks