Cargando…
Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study
INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to evaluate the influence of quality of transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer on the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in the post hoc analysis of the single-center randomized controlled trial. MATER...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015903 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.0003 |
_version_ | 1783490924426297344 |
---|---|
author | Rolevich, Alexander Minich, Alexander Vasilevich, Vladimir Zhegalik, Alexander Mokhort, Andrey Nabebina, Tatiana Krasny, Sergey Polyakov, Sergey Sukonko, Oleg |
author_facet | Rolevich, Alexander Minich, Alexander Vasilevich, Vladimir Zhegalik, Alexander Mokhort, Andrey Nabebina, Tatiana Krasny, Sergey Polyakov, Sergey Sukonko, Oleg |
author_sort | Rolevich, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to evaluate the influence of quality of transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer on the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in the post hoc analysis of the single-center randomized controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the results of the prospective randomized study assessing the efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection. The quality of transurethral resection was defined on the basis of a separate retrospective study estimating the variability in recurrence risk for the individual surgeon. The subgroup analysis of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection efficacy depending on surgical experience was performed. RESULTS: Of 377 eligible patients, transurethral resection was performed in 365 (97%) by surgeons with available grading information. Two ‘experienced’ surgeons performed 238 (63%) of all transurethral resections and three ‘less experienced’ surgeons completed 127 (34%) surgeries. The two surgical groups were comparable with respect to basic prognostic factors and subsequent therapy. The median follow-up was 56 months. In the total cohort of patients, fluorescent cystoscopy significantly decreased the risk of recurrence with hazard ratio 0.58 (p = 0.004). In the ‘experienced surgeons' subgroup the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy was not significant (hazard ratio 0.81, p = 0.34), whereas the ‘less experienced’ subgroup showed a marked difference in favor of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection (hazard ratio 0.31, p = 0.001), with a P-value for interaction of 0.021. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline quality of surgery may be a significant interacting factor affecting the magnitude of the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6979560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69795602020-02-03 Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study Rolevich, Alexander Minich, Alexander Vasilevich, Vladimir Zhegalik, Alexander Mokhort, Andrey Nabebina, Tatiana Krasny, Sergey Polyakov, Sergey Sukonko, Oleg Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to evaluate the influence of quality of transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer on the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in the post hoc analysis of the single-center randomized controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the results of the prospective randomized study assessing the efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection. The quality of transurethral resection was defined on the basis of a separate retrospective study estimating the variability in recurrence risk for the individual surgeon. The subgroup analysis of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection efficacy depending on surgical experience was performed. RESULTS: Of 377 eligible patients, transurethral resection was performed in 365 (97%) by surgeons with available grading information. Two ‘experienced’ surgeons performed 238 (63%) of all transurethral resections and three ‘less experienced’ surgeons completed 127 (34%) surgeries. The two surgical groups were comparable with respect to basic prognostic factors and subsequent therapy. The median follow-up was 56 months. In the total cohort of patients, fluorescent cystoscopy significantly decreased the risk of recurrence with hazard ratio 0.58 (p = 0.004). In the ‘experienced surgeons' subgroup the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy was not significant (hazard ratio 0.81, p = 0.34), whereas the ‘less experienced’ subgroup showed a marked difference in favor of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection (hazard ratio 0.31, p = 0.001), with a P-value for interaction of 0.021. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline quality of surgery may be a significant interacting factor affecting the magnitude of the benefit of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Polish Urological Association 2019-09-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6979560/ /pubmed/32015903 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.0003 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rolevich, Alexander Minich, Alexander Vasilevich, Vladimir Zhegalik, Alexander Mokhort, Andrey Nabebina, Tatiana Krasny, Sergey Polyakov, Sergey Sukonko, Oleg Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
title | Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
title_full | Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
title_short | Efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
title_sort | efficacy of fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and quality of surgery: post-hoc analysis of а prospective randomized study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015903 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.0003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rolevichalexander efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT minichalexander efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT vasilevichvladimir efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT zhegalikalexander efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT mokhortandrey efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT nabebinatatiana efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT krasnysergey efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT polyakovsergey efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT sukonkooleg efficacyoffluorescentcystoscopyassistedtransurethralresectioninpatientswithnonmuscleinvasivebladdercancerandqualityofsurgeryposthocanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedstudy |