Cargando…

Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?

Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of both curative and palliative cancer care. However, radiotherapy is severely limited by radiation-induced toxicities. If these toxicities could be reduced, a greater dose of radiation could be given therefore facilitating a better tumor response. Initial pre-clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Joseph D., Hammond, Ester M., Higgins, Geoff S., Petersson, Kristoffer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01563
_version_ 1783490931434979328
author Wilson, Joseph D.
Hammond, Ester M.
Higgins, Geoff S.
Petersson, Kristoffer
author_facet Wilson, Joseph D.
Hammond, Ester M.
Higgins, Geoff S.
Petersson, Kristoffer
author_sort Wilson, Joseph D.
collection PubMed
description Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of both curative and palliative cancer care. However, radiotherapy is severely limited by radiation-induced toxicities. If these toxicities could be reduced, a greater dose of radiation could be given therefore facilitating a better tumor response. Initial pre-clinical studies have shown that irradiation at dose rates far exceeding those currently used in clinical contexts reduce radiation-induced toxicities whilst maintaining an equivalent tumor response. This is known as the FLASH effect. To date, a single patient has been subjected to FLASH radiotherapy for the treatment of subcutaneous T-cell lymphoma resulting in complete response and minimal toxicities. The mechanism responsible for reduced tissue toxicity following FLASH radiotherapy is yet to be elucidated, but the most prominent hypothesis so far proposed is that acute oxygen depletion occurs within the irradiated tissue. This review examines the tissue response to FLASH radiotherapy, critically evaluates the evidence supporting hypotheses surrounding the biological basis of the FLASH effect, and considers the potential for FLASH radiotherapy to be translated into clinical contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6979639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69796392020-02-01 Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? Wilson, Joseph D. Hammond, Ester M. Higgins, Geoff S. Petersson, Kristoffer Front Oncol Oncology Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of both curative and palliative cancer care. However, radiotherapy is severely limited by radiation-induced toxicities. If these toxicities could be reduced, a greater dose of radiation could be given therefore facilitating a better tumor response. Initial pre-clinical studies have shown that irradiation at dose rates far exceeding those currently used in clinical contexts reduce radiation-induced toxicities whilst maintaining an equivalent tumor response. This is known as the FLASH effect. To date, a single patient has been subjected to FLASH radiotherapy for the treatment of subcutaneous T-cell lymphoma resulting in complete response and minimal toxicities. The mechanism responsible for reduced tissue toxicity following FLASH radiotherapy is yet to be elucidated, but the most prominent hypothesis so far proposed is that acute oxygen depletion occurs within the irradiated tissue. This review examines the tissue response to FLASH radiotherapy, critically evaluates the evidence supporting hypotheses surrounding the biological basis of the FLASH effect, and considers the potential for FLASH radiotherapy to be translated into clinical contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6979639/ /pubmed/32010633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01563 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wilson, Hammond, Higgins and Petersson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wilson, Joseph D.
Hammond, Ester M.
Higgins, Geoff S.
Petersson, Kristoffer
Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
title Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
title_full Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
title_fullStr Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
title_short Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?
title_sort ultra-high dose rate (flash) radiotherapy: silver bullet or fool's gold?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01563
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonjosephd ultrahighdoserateflashradiotherapysilverbulletorfoolsgold
AT hammondesterm ultrahighdoserateflashradiotherapysilverbulletorfoolsgold
AT higginsgeoffs ultrahighdoserateflashradiotherapysilverbulletorfoolsgold
AT peterssonkristoffer ultrahighdoserateflashradiotherapysilverbulletorfoolsgold