Cargando…

Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity. METHODS: We grew 23 li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whalley, W.R., Binley, A., Watts, C.W., Shanahan, P., Dodd, I.C., Ober, E.S., Ashton, R.W., Webster, C.P., White, R.P., Hawkesford, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1
_version_ 1783490932843216896
author Whalley, W.R.
Binley, A.
Watts, C.W.
Shanahan, P.
Dodd, I.C.
Ober, E.S.
Ashton, R.W.
Webster, C.P.
White, R.P.
Hawkesford, M. J.
author_facet Whalley, W.R.
Binley, A.
Watts, C.W.
Shanahan, P.
Dodd, I.C.
Ober, E.S.
Ashton, R.W.
Webster, C.P.
White, R.P.
Hawkesford, M. J.
author_sort Whalley, W.R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity. METHODS: We grew 23 lines of wheat in 2013, 2014 and 2015. In each year we estimated soil water profiles with electrical resistance tomography (ERT), electromagnetic inductance (EMI), penetrometer measurements and measurements of soil water content. We determined the relationships between the measured variable and soil water content and matric potential. RESULTS: We found that ERT and penetrometer measurements were closely related to soil matric potential and produced the best discrimination between wheat lines. We found genotypic differences in depth of water uptake in soil water profiles and in the extent of surface drying. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrometer measurements can provide a reliable approach to comparing soil drying profiles by different wheat lines, and genotypic rankings are repeatable across years. EMI, which is more sensitive to soil water content than matric potential, and is less effective in drier soils than the penetrometer or ERT, nevertheless can be used to rapidly screen large populations for differences in root activity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6979655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69796552020-02-03 Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field Whalley, W.R. Binley, A. Watts, C.W. Shanahan, P. Dodd, I.C. Ober, E.S. Ashton, R.W. Webster, C.P. White, R.P. Hawkesford, M. J. Plant Soil Methods Paper BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity. METHODS: We grew 23 lines of wheat in 2013, 2014 and 2015. In each year we estimated soil water profiles with electrical resistance tomography (ERT), electromagnetic inductance (EMI), penetrometer measurements and measurements of soil water content. We determined the relationships between the measured variable and soil water content and matric potential. RESULTS: We found that ERT and penetrometer measurements were closely related to soil matric potential and produced the best discrimination between wheat lines. We found genotypic differences in depth of water uptake in soil water profiles and in the extent of surface drying. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrometer measurements can provide a reliable approach to comparing soil drying profiles by different wheat lines, and genotypic rankings are repeatable across years. EMI, which is more sensitive to soil water content than matric potential, and is less effective in drier soils than the penetrometer or ERT, nevertheless can be used to rapidly screen large populations for differences in root activity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6979655/ /pubmed/32025056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Methods Paper
Whalley, W.R.
Binley, A.
Watts, C.W.
Shanahan, P.
Dodd, I.C.
Ober, E.S.
Ashton, R.W.
Webster, C.P.
White, R.P.
Hawkesford, M. J.
Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
title Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
title_full Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
title_fullStr Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
title_full_unstemmed Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
title_short Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
title_sort methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
topic Methods Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1
work_keys_str_mv AT whalleywr methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT binleya methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT wattscw methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT shanahanp methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT doddic methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT oberes methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT ashtonrw methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT webstercp methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT whiterp methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield
AT hawkesfordmj methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield