Cargando…
Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity. METHODS: We grew 23 li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1 |
_version_ | 1783490932843216896 |
---|---|
author | Whalley, W.R. Binley, A. Watts, C.W. Shanahan, P. Dodd, I.C. Ober, E.S. Ashton, R.W. Webster, C.P. White, R.P. Hawkesford, M. J. |
author_facet | Whalley, W.R. Binley, A. Watts, C.W. Shanahan, P. Dodd, I.C. Ober, E.S. Ashton, R.W. Webster, C.P. White, R.P. Hawkesford, M. J. |
author_sort | Whalley, W.R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity. METHODS: We grew 23 lines of wheat in 2013, 2014 and 2015. In each year we estimated soil water profiles with electrical resistance tomography (ERT), electromagnetic inductance (EMI), penetrometer measurements and measurements of soil water content. We determined the relationships between the measured variable and soil water content and matric potential. RESULTS: We found that ERT and penetrometer measurements were closely related to soil matric potential and produced the best discrimination between wheat lines. We found genotypic differences in depth of water uptake in soil water profiles and in the extent of surface drying. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrometer measurements can provide a reliable approach to comparing soil drying profiles by different wheat lines, and genotypic rankings are repeatable across years. EMI, which is more sensitive to soil water content than matric potential, and is less effective in drier soils than the penetrometer or ERT, nevertheless can be used to rapidly screen large populations for differences in root activity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6979655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69796552020-02-03 Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field Whalley, W.R. Binley, A. Watts, C.W. Shanahan, P. Dodd, I.C. Ober, E.S. Ashton, R.W. Webster, C.P. White, R.P. Hawkesford, M. J. Plant Soil Methods Paper BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an urgent need to develop new high throughput approaches to phenotype roots in the field. Excavating roots to make direct measurements is labour intensive. An alternative to excavation is to measure soil drying profiles and to infer root activity. METHODS: We grew 23 lines of wheat in 2013, 2014 and 2015. In each year we estimated soil water profiles with electrical resistance tomography (ERT), electromagnetic inductance (EMI), penetrometer measurements and measurements of soil water content. We determined the relationships between the measured variable and soil water content and matric potential. RESULTS: We found that ERT and penetrometer measurements were closely related to soil matric potential and produced the best discrimination between wheat lines. We found genotypic differences in depth of water uptake in soil water profiles and in the extent of surface drying. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrometer measurements can provide a reliable approach to comparing soil drying profiles by different wheat lines, and genotypic rankings are repeatable across years. EMI, which is more sensitive to soil water content than matric potential, and is less effective in drier soils than the penetrometer or ERT, nevertheless can be used to rapidly screen large populations for differences in root activity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6979655/ /pubmed/32025056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Methods Paper Whalley, W.R. Binley, A. Watts, C.W. Shanahan, P. Dodd, I.C. Ober, E.S. Ashton, R.W. Webster, C.P. White, R.P. Hawkesford, M. J. Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
title | Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
title_full | Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
title_fullStr | Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
title_short | Methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
title_sort | methods to estimate changes in soil water for phenotyping root activity in the field |
topic | Methods Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3161-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whalleywr methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT binleya methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT wattscw methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT shanahanp methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT doddic methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT oberes methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT ashtonrw methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT webstercp methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT whiterp methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield AT hawkesfordmj methodstoestimatechangesinsoilwaterforphenotypingrootactivityinthefield |