Cargando…
A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural “production lens”—for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9 |
_version_ | 1783490936633819136 |
---|---|
author | Wittman, Hannah Chappell, Michael Jahi Abson, David James Kerr, Rachel Bezner Blesh, Jennifer Hanspach, Jan Perfecto, Ivette Fischer, Joern |
author_facet | Wittman, Hannah Chappell, Michael Jahi Abson, David James Kerr, Rachel Bezner Blesh, Jennifer Hanspach, Jan Perfecto, Ivette Fischer, Joern |
author_sort | Wittman, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural “production lens”—for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or the concept of sustainable intensification. However, a productionist perspective has been criticized for being too narrow, and failing to consider other relevant factors, including policy, equity, and diversity. We propose an approach that conceptualizes rural landscapes as social–ecological systems embedded within intersecting multi-scalar processes. Based on such a framing, empirical research can be more clearly set in the context of system properties that may influence food security, biodiversity conservation, or both. We illustrate our approach through a description of contrasting agricultural systems within Brazil’s Cerrado region. We emphasize the need for new empirical research involving systematic comparisons of social–ecological system properties in landscapes threatened by food insecurity and ecosystem degradation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6979715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69797152020-02-03 A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation Wittman, Hannah Chappell, Michael Jahi Abson, David James Kerr, Rachel Bezner Blesh, Jennifer Hanspach, Jan Perfecto, Ivette Fischer, Joern Reg Environ Change Original Article The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural “production lens”—for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or the concept of sustainable intensification. However, a productionist perspective has been criticized for being too narrow, and failing to consider other relevant factors, including policy, equity, and diversity. We propose an approach that conceptualizes rural landscapes as social–ecological systems embedded within intersecting multi-scalar processes. Based on such a framing, empirical research can be more clearly set in the context of system properties that may influence food security, biodiversity conservation, or both. We illustrate our approach through a description of contrasting agricultural systems within Brazil’s Cerrado region. We emphasize the need for new empirical research involving systematic comparisons of social–ecological system properties in landscapes threatened by food insecurity and ecosystem degradation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6979715/ /pubmed/32025201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wittman, Hannah Chappell, Michael Jahi Abson, David James Kerr, Rachel Bezner Blesh, Jennifer Hanspach, Jan Perfecto, Ivette Fischer, Joern A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
title | A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
title_full | A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
title_fullStr | A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
title_full_unstemmed | A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
title_short | A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
title_sort | social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittmanhannah asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT chappellmichaeljahi asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT absondavidjames asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT kerrrachelbezner asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT bleshjennifer asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT hanspachjan asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT perfectoivette asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT fischerjoern asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT wittmanhannah socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT chappellmichaeljahi socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT absondavidjames socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT kerrrachelbezner socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT bleshjennifer socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT hanspachjan socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT perfectoivette socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation AT fischerjoern socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation |