Cargando…

A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation

The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural “production lens”—for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittman, Hannah, Chappell, Michael Jahi, Abson, David James, Kerr, Rachel Bezner, Blesh, Jennifer, Hanspach, Jan, Perfecto, Ivette, Fischer, Joern
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9
_version_ 1783490936633819136
author Wittman, Hannah
Chappell, Michael Jahi
Abson, David James
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Blesh, Jennifer
Hanspach, Jan
Perfecto, Ivette
Fischer, Joern
author_facet Wittman, Hannah
Chappell, Michael Jahi
Abson, David James
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Blesh, Jennifer
Hanspach, Jan
Perfecto, Ivette
Fischer, Joern
author_sort Wittman, Hannah
collection PubMed
description The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural “production lens”—for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or the concept of sustainable intensification. However, a productionist perspective has been criticized for being too narrow, and failing to consider other relevant factors, including policy, equity, and diversity. We propose an approach that conceptualizes rural landscapes as social–ecological systems embedded within intersecting multi-scalar processes. Based on such a framing, empirical research can be more clearly set in the context of system properties that may influence food security, biodiversity conservation, or both. We illustrate our approach through a description of contrasting agricultural systems within Brazil’s Cerrado region. We emphasize the need for new empirical research involving systematic comparisons of social–ecological system properties in landscapes threatened by food insecurity and ecosystem degradation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6979715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69797152020-02-03 A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation Wittman, Hannah Chappell, Michael Jahi Abson, David James Kerr, Rachel Bezner Blesh, Jennifer Hanspach, Jan Perfecto, Ivette Fischer, Joern Reg Environ Change Original Article The major challenges of improving food security and biodiversity conservation are intricately linked. To date, the intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation has been viewed primarily through an agricultural “production lens”—for example, via the land sparing/sharing framework, or the concept of sustainable intensification. However, a productionist perspective has been criticized for being too narrow, and failing to consider other relevant factors, including policy, equity, and diversity. We propose an approach that conceptualizes rural landscapes as social–ecological systems embedded within intersecting multi-scalar processes. Based on such a framing, empirical research can be more clearly set in the context of system properties that may influence food security, biodiversity conservation, or both. We illustrate our approach through a description of contrasting agricultural systems within Brazil’s Cerrado region. We emphasize the need for new empirical research involving systematic comparisons of social–ecological system properties in landscapes threatened by food insecurity and ecosystem degradation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6979715/ /pubmed/32025201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wittman, Hannah
Chappell, Michael Jahi
Abson, David James
Kerr, Rachel Bezner
Blesh, Jennifer
Hanspach, Jan
Perfecto, Ivette
Fischer, Joern
A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
title A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
title_full A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
title_fullStr A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
title_full_unstemmed A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
title_short A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
title_sort social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6979715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1045-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wittmanhannah asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT chappellmichaeljahi asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT absondavidjames asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT kerrrachelbezner asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT bleshjennifer asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT hanspachjan asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT perfectoivette asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT fischerjoern asocialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT wittmanhannah socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT chappellmichaeljahi socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT absondavidjames socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT kerrrachelbezner socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT bleshjennifer socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT hanspachjan socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT perfectoivette socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation
AT fischerjoern socialecologicalperspectiveonharmonizingfoodsecurityandbiodiversityconservation